Would you rather be a billionaire in 1917 or making 100k a year in 2017?:

FSP

Banned
Joined
Jun 19, 2015
Messages
14,285
Reputation
1,134
Daps
42,287
There's plenty of ways someone could insulate themselves enough to get things done. '

People have done way more with less, so I'm sure someone with purpose and deep pockets could have a sweeping affect
It's a drop in the bucket in the grand scheme of things. Its like, you could spend the money to build big things, then you would have to pay for every second that "thing" exists because you will have people working eagerly to destroy it. Like how the federal government has trillions of dollars but rarely gets anything big done. that's sometimes how people respond to radical change. It's really not that much money. Billy Gates could drop every cent of his fortune on something tomorrow and it might barely register. In fact I'm sure that's why he's slow in spending any of it. No matter how much money you spend, you might just not be able to cross that time and culture barrier it takes to have an appreciable effect. It's crazy how some are neglecting the importance of the two. I'm not saying it wouldn't have an effect, I'm just saying, year 1917 is horrible awful timing. Also the depression would sink your battleships very quickly if charity is your main thing. My opinion, you can't put a price tag on progression a century old, not just any century either, literally the most progressive century in human history I dare somebody to disagree
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,315
Reputation
-2,880
Daps
29,666
Reppin
Chi-town
You gotta think 3-dimensionally. In 1917 all of those types of broads are still in Latin america. So just send some recruiters down and have'em brought to you. You're a billionaire remember. :youngsabo:

u cant find a bad latin bytch today?:stopitslime:
 

TooLazyToMakeUp1

LWO suicide bomber
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
24,878
Reputation
8,770
Daps
96,446
Reppin
Out here in my damn drawls
The issue was more than what u just mentioned.

It was the segregation, white supremacist, world war, and all the resourses you are going to use for uplift black culture the were white owned.

U gonna tell them your finance and think nothing is going to happened?:russ:


You don't have to live where they live, use the resources that they own, or deal with them directly


There's plenty of ways around obstacles if you're determined.



Assuming you're black and american:

Imagine if the people before you didn't try to do anything because they thought it was futile.

You wouldn't even exist and even if you did, you wouldn't be free to benefit from modern civilization
 

Michael's Black Son

Blanket Jackson
Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
53,812
Reputation
15,978
Daps
235,777
Reppin
New York City & Neverland Ranch
tumblr_mlkoyadFCT1so5xtno1_400.gif


And up your gify game, ya bish :wow:

Cookie-Slap.gif
 

ManBearPig

half man half bearpig
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
27,315
Reputation
-2,880
Daps
29,666
Reppin
Chi-town
You don't have to live where they live, use the resources that they own, or deal with them directly


There's plenty of ways around obstacles if you're determined.



Assuming you're black and american:

Imagine if the people before you didn't try to do anything because they thought it was futile.

You wouldn't even exist and even if you did, you wouldn't be free to benefit from modern civilization


lack of money wasn't the problem. :mindblown:

it was the lack of equal rights and God awful hate crime.
 

joeychizzle

光復香港,時代革命
Joined
Apr 3, 2014
Messages
12,078
Reputation
4,160
Daps
32,531
Reppin
852
Bill gates got more than that and there are still issues in this society that his money can't solve. :yeshrug:.

U can't just show up with 1 billion dollars and think everything is going to be all good
Well the thing is, most billionaires aren't willing to part with their money completely. But 20.89 billion could be used to set up some needed infrastructure, important repairs, fund and grant crucial programs and charities, etc. Of course there's gonna be problems that money can't solve, it's unfortunately how life is. But we can't say it won't make a dent :hubie:
We could buy every homeless person a house. Every recipient of meals on wheels could be covered for life. Families struggling to feed they kids could be getting real meals until they were old enough and actually got jobs of their own. At risk individuals could be helped.

That is, if the tenders don't get won by crooked ass contractors that hog the money and give like 5% of what they promised.:yeshrug:
 

klientel

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,653
Reputation
2,039
Daps
79,737
So am I aware of what its like in 2017 or is 1917 all I know.? Because if you gave me a bil and then sent me back to 1917....nah I'm good. :francis:

But if I was just a dude living in 1917 and came up on a bil with no knowledge of the future then of course.
 

The Amerikkkan Idol

The Amerikkkan Nightmare
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
13,919
Reputation
3,671
Daps
37,348


100k a year really ain't shyt breh

:heh: Unless you live in New York City, LA, or San Francisco, 100k is enough to be upper class in the richest country in the history of the world.

A world that has the internet, cell phones, indoor plumbing in 99% of the country.

I mean, just think of the medical advances.

Dudes in the '80s were dying of gunshot wounds that would be walking out the hospital with today just 30 years later.

Ben Wilson would be alive if he had gotten shot in 2016.

If you're diabetic, you done.
You get cancer, you're probably done
You catch an STD, you're most likely done.
If your wife gives birth, she could be done
If your kid gets sick, they might be done

Like seriously, John D. Rockefeller would give most, if not all of his fortune to live in today's world.

I wouldn't even want to be white in 1917.

I don't even know what I'd buy. :mjlol:

That's what I'm saying.

These dudes under estimate shyt they take for granted.

I mean, the highway system that Eisenhower made in the '50s made it possible to get from New York to California in a car in like a few days.

Back then, it'd take like a fukking month and by the time you got there, half of your family would've died from tuburculosis
I love these type of threads where brehs get morals. :russ:....like we ain't seen ya posts in JBO:lolbron:

On some bu bu generational wealth....statues etc

Take that 100k...live like your fav rapper or invest & build on it. Let's be real your great great great great grandchild gone be a bedwench/buck anyway & gen wealth down the drain:yeshrug:

Imagine coli brehs going from

Meagan-Good-Bet-Awards-2013.jpg



To this
African-American%2BWomen%2Bfrom%2Bbetween%2B1920s-40s%2B%25287%2529.jpg


Them 1920's women aren't ugly either buuuuut:usure:

You think 1920's women gone swallow the kids....let alone give head:mjgrin:

I'm on your side, man, but them old broads are fine as hell, and they're natural, so you know what you're getting with them and not that fake makeup/plastic surgery shyt that you get from the broads now.:leon:

Y'all niqqas cheating. U can't pick 1917 and go back with knowledge from 2017.

:heh:Exactly, these nikkaz up here like "I would've invented computers, I would've invented this or that"

You're only a billionaire, that doesn't mean you're a super genius who has the gift of clairvoyance.

You gotta think 3-dimensionally. In 1917 all of those types of broads are still in Latin america. So just send some recruiters down and have'em brought to you. You're a billionaire remember. :youngsabo:

Yeah, but it'd take like 3 months and half of them would've died of typhoid on the trip to America. :pachaha:
 
Top