Would you rather tackle Brandon Jacobs or Mike Alstott?

[Remote]

 

[RedBull]

I rather have Alstott. Trust him more.

 

[jerzboy]

Jacobs… although both were beast. But Alsott… dude was a problem. Him and Dunn. Wish Dungy won a chip with them

 

[get these nets]

Jacobs

 

[jerzboy]

I don’t know if people remember, but A Train was pretty much a RB in a full back body, and yes he could block, wasn’t the great at it but could. Wish more teams utilized a back like him, especially in today’s era. Ravens and 9er’s try, but they ain’t A Train.

 

[jadillac]

Alstott played when thr league was still wild with headhunters.

Plus, as a FB Alstott put up almost better numbers than Jacobs did as a RB

 

[King Harlem]

Alstott is going to break your tackle and leave you frustrated.
Jacobs is going to run over you and leave you dazed.
I'm trying to tackle Alstott.

 

[the artist known az]

Alstott is going to break your tackle and leave you frustrated.
Jacobs is going to run over you and leave you dazed.
I'm trying to tackle Alstott.

This is one of the few people that actually answered the question. I agree, although both will run you over, it probably won't hurt as much from Mike

 

[jetflyinglimousineriding]

If you don't want to get embarrassed probably Alstott because Jacobs and his speed coming at you downhill is going to worst than Alstott who was more trying to be a little bit slippery to avoid getting brought down.

 

[concise]

Try to tackle Alstott and you fail.
Try to tackle Jacobs and you fail and get hurt.

 

[feelosofer]

I actually think Alstott would be a more difficult tackle because he had all that power in a more compact build. I will vote Jacobs.

 

[Pack2]

Alstott is going to break your tackle and leave you frustrated.
Jacobs is going to run over you and leave you dazed.
I'm trying to tackle Alstott.

This is correct

 

[yseJ]

neither

 

[Rice N Beans]

Just inject me with CTE instead.

 

[staticshock]

Jacobs is way bigger. Id take my chances with Alstott