But that was like 98-00 era. We're talking more Golden Era slights
I gotchu but like others have pointed out already, The Source gave a good amount of West coast albums back then some excellent ratings.
But that was like 98-00 era. We're talking more Golden Era slights
Read the thread.
This isn't true at all.
Check this thread out.
EDIT: SOURCE MAGAZINE BIAS PROVEN TO BE MYTH - Source Top 100 Albums list

Got you. I misunderstood what you were saying breh.Naw, I know. I'm just saying, back in the day there was a lot of bias. Not with all NY nikkas, but a good number
Can't just ignore that breh. Not in 93.That was some pure hatery from the source
Its On was a great fuking Ep
There wasnt a single skippable track on that...whole shyt banged
Yeah Eazy wasnt an MC but by 93 his flow was on point...shyt sold 3 million...included one of the greatest diss songs ever and was his comeback
![]()
Got you. I misunderstood what you were saying breh.
No it hasn't. The only 5 Mic ORIGINAL from the west was produced by east coast legends.This Source magazine East coast bias has already been debunked several times on here but dudes continue with the bullsh!t.
Two overrated nobodies.
The Source had beef with Eazy. It wasn't just the Source, A lot of black people were pissed when he defended the police officer who beat Rodney King.

A lot of east coast albums with meh production and repetitive themes got OVERrated (illmatic), even though there were better albums coming out.compare what music was back in the day it was a 2...but in this era its a 5 star
Eazy was an average rapper. He didn't deserve a 5 mic.
Saying otherwise is west-coast tribalism.
No it hasn't. The only 5 Mic ORIGINAL from the west was produced by east coast legends.
And every west coast 5 Mic album had to be ruthless or deathrow alumni.
Meanwhile has an array of characters
@Wacky D came in this thread?Wacky, you really think anybody on here takes you seriously?