WSJ: Videogame Giant Electronic Arts Near Roughly $50 Billion Deal to Go Private (UPDATE: Acquired by PIF, Silver Lake, and Affinity Partners)

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
51,362
Reputation
13,111
Daps
129,562
Breh really showed up in the thread ready to try to start an argument because y'all said Microsoft three times. :dead:
I ain't even look over this thread.

And I have zero doubt the amount of post complaining about consolidation is less the the number of pages :mjlol:


Just calling out the hypocrisy, consolidation is only a issue for certain folks when it comes from a certain brand :manny:
 

Legal

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
17,079
Reputation
3,541
Daps
65,114
Reppin
NULL
Why would private money not be legal in the sense of buying out a corporation?

In general, it's due to how private equity is allowed to leverage debt to make the purchase that they don't have, and likely never would've had. Essentially, the invest funds are borrowing money against the value of the company they're trying to buy in order to buy said company. It'd be like trying to get a mortgage to buy a house using money from a Home Equity Line of Credit based on the equity that the current owners have in the home. If someone like you or I tried doing that, we're probably eating a couple of years for mortgage fraud.

What makes it worse is that the way these leveraged buyouts work, they basically work as if the acquired company took out a loan against its own value (which is why news of these types of acquisitions almost always leaks; it boosts the value of the company), adding that money to whatever the gross payout for shareholders is, and then the invest fund acquires the company for a cash amount, plus assuming whatever debt the acquired company has on the books. So, in this case, if they sale is $55 million, and the company ends up with $20 billion in debt on the books after purchase, private equity REALLY only paid $35 billion cash, and had the company take out a $20 billion loan so they could buy out their shareholders. The acquired company typically remains a wholly owned subsidiary, so if the debt ends up tanking the company, its future bankruptcy doesn't hurt the investment fund, but its potential sale to someone else (usually during bankruptcy) DOES end up being money that goes straight to them. So, not only do they end up paying less out of pocket than they should have for the company, they did it at a discount, since these buyouts usually close at a lower rate than if controlling shares were purchased at market value. Even doubly so when you consider that technically the shareholder buyout is coming partially from debt their own company took out to buy them.

The whole process is done with a goal of extracting maximum value from the company in a five to seven year period, and then either filing for bankruptcy or selling to the next sucker that's willing to kick the debt can down the road.
 
Top