Xbots engage. Naughty Dogshyt strugglin to get 60FPS on PS4 :mjlol:

[Ciggavelli]

PCgang too but let's not act like we getting 1080P/60fps on any old setup. I still ain't seen 60fps on Larry Dogs.

You're doing it wrong. Just play it on medium or low. You'll get your 60fps

Like I said in another thread, I don't think people even care about 60fps. If they did, you'd see more 60fps games on the consoles. For most people, graphics > fps. Devs know this and that's why we see so many 30fps games

 

[Fatboi1]

You're doing it wrong. Just play it on medium or low. You'll get your 60fps

Like I said in another thread, I don't think people even care about 60fps. If they did, you'd see more 60fps games on the consoles. For most people, graphics > fps. Devs know this and that's why we see so many 30fps games

Larry dogs still can't go to sixty.

 

[Dominic Brehetto]

I remember when GOW was sonys flagship, its uncharted now though eh?

I remember when halo used to be made by bungie and people loved it.

 

[Ciggavelli]

Larry dogs still can't go to sixty.

It does on mine. But I have a better cpu and gpu

I'm not playing on medium or low though. fukk that game

 

[Dragonfly Jones]

You brehs need to invest in gaming PCs

i have a gaming pc ( GTX680 4gb of vram , will eventually cop a 980 when the price lowers) and outside of NBA 2k I usually keep the 30fps lock on all my games.

Rather have my gpu temps being in the 50s/60s than have them in the 70s/80s celsius tryna acheive 60/120 fps on games.

Also gives me room to up the graphical effects to high/ultra without having to worry about frame dips

I still play Sega genesis, N64 and NES games regularly so it's not really that serious to me

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I'm not talking about graphics vs framerate.

I'm talking about 30fps vs 60fps

People have been on this board and in this thread stating that it's not a big of a deal to them because they can't tell the difference. Campaigns can be 30fps with maxed out graphics, but when discussing MP games, there's really no debate. These devs should treat the campaigns with that special "graphical" attention, and the multiplayers should be reserved for performance and the highest fps possible.

You claim your just talking about 30 vs 60. Then you give your opinion on what graphics/framerate balance you'd like.

Other people disagree. That doesn't make them dumb

 

[GoldenGlove]

You claim your just talking about 30 vs 60. Then you give your opinion on what graphics/framerate balance you'd like.

Other people disagree. That doesn't make them dumb

I commented on what you brought up. My initial question asked in your opinion what makes 30fps better than 60fps.

You then brought up graphics in your reply. I've already said how I feel about this.

Campaign with maxed out graphics = 30fps
Multiplayer with toned down graphics = 60fps

Everybody wins

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I commented on what you brought up. My initial question asked in your opinion what makes 30fps better than 60fps.

You then brought up graphics in your reply. I've already said how I feel about this.

Campaign with maxed out graphics = 30fps
Multiplayer with toned down graphics = 60fps

Everybody wins

Your initial question was a strawman cause nobody argued that 30>60 all else equal. What people in this thread said is that 30+max graphics>60 with sacrifices.

And no everybody doesn't win with your opinion. As I said, some people disagree.

 

[GoldenGlove]

Who?

 

[Fatboi1]

I commented on what you brought up. My initial question asked in your opinion what makes 30fps better than 60fps.

You then brought up graphics in your reply. I've already said how I feel about this.

Campaign with maxed out graphics = 30fps
Multiplayer with toned down graphics = 60fps

Everybody wins

That'd be fine with me. I'm sure everything that ND is pushing for in SP such as the more complex AI system, stealth system, dynamic melee system, set pieces etc. probably wouldn't be translated online since I'll assume it'll be the typical meat and potatoes MP where it's just 10 or so players on a map shooting each other.

I'm going to bet that UC4 SP is either going to hit a locked 30fps with maybe a framerate unlock option such as the one found in Infamous Second son. Hell, Infamous First light averaged 40fps and that's an open world game.

 

[Grand Conde]

This 1080p/720p/60fps/30fps etc bullshyt is really the stupidest debate ever to come to gaming. Absolutely no one gave a shyt two years ago.

Also at BP posting this ínformation a week after it was put up on Neogaf.

 

[BasedPrime]

Be on a cac-filled-fakkit site brehs

 

[Rack4K]

@BasedPrime

 

[ll_simon]

This 1080p/720p/60fps/30fps etc bullshyt is really the stupidest debate ever to come to gaming. Absolutely no one gave a shyt two years ago.

Also at BP posting this ínformation a week after it was put up on Neogaf.

thats a lie since we were promised 1080p last gen

 

[Rekkapryde]

This 1080p/720p/60fps/30fps etc bullshyt is really the stupidest debate ever to come to gaming. Absolutely no one gave a shyt two years ago.

Also at BP posting this ínformation a week after it was put up on Neogaf.

that's absolutely not true.

People have ALWAYS argued about graphics, etc. in games. The reason many blogs/journalists here in the states "don't care" now is that their preferred system of choice isn't up to par with the competition.