Xbox E3 2019 Briefing (June 9th at 4PM EST)

[thaKEAF]

Cyberpunk is first person?

 

[O.T.I.S.]

Solid E3 for me

I'm already preordering and downloading shyt

When you haven't got content you have to start using gimmicks

What content doesn't it have?

GOW4 is like 4 years old and still gets burn. All they need to do is revamp the game with new shyt including skins,,,,


Most of us GOW fans just want all the old classic maps for the most part

 

[O.T.I.S.]

I mean if you completely ignore the fact that PS5 will undoubtedly build on the extensive and wide variety of true system exclusives then I can probably see your point but that's not true is it? I think the big divider in opinions between both Xbox and PS fans is Xbox fans pretend they don't know why someone who gets a PS console each gen does it. I mean, when we say exclusives, we mean it.

This gen I've bought on Playstation and these were only on Playstation:
Uncharted 4
Uncharted The Lost Legacy
Bloodborne
Until Dawn
Ratchet and Clank
The Order 1886
Infamous Second Son
Killzone ShadowFall
Driveclub
Knack
Knack 2
Horizon Zero Dawn
God of War
Marvel's Spider-Man
The Last Guardian
Astro Bot(PSVR)
RE7(which only has VR on PS4)
Persona 5
Fez(PSVR)

I didn't even include any remasters or PS4/PC games and also there's a few I didn't cop yet(Gravity Rush 2, Yakuza etc.)

Then we still have FFVII Remake, Dreams(which technically is out right now early access), Death Stranding, Ghost of Tushima and finally TLOU Part II.

How can someone pretend there's no reason for those games alone to cop a PS4 for? So in Sony fashion this is what they do every gen. Notice how there's a WIDE variety of games there.

Contrast that with Xbox and here's the titles that as of right now you NEED an Xbox to play them on:
Halo 5 (campaign. MP is on PC with server browser technically)
Forza 5

Again, with MSFT moving all their games to PC and even tinkering with Switch, Xbox is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things when it comes to being a MUST HAVE console especially with PC gaming increasing in popularity. Now this doesn't mean you can't enjoy or buy Xbox but y'all can't act shocked nobody is that hyped for Xbox like that.
Better for me.

Only game I care about on that list was Spiderman


Y'all Sony nerds got to understand most of us on XB1 play multiplayer games... that's all usually.


Multiplat story games are the biggest sellers, but no one gives af about playing these lonely ass rpg's

XB1X had Gears, Halo5, ALL of the Forza games, Titanfall/2 (creators of Apex), Sea of Thieves, State of Decay, Sunset Overdrive, Ashen, Ori, Cuphead, ReCore, Quantum Break, A Walk in the Dark, etc., and thats not including all the 360 games available and free shyt


We're good on games nikka

 

[Fatboi1]

Only game I care about on that list was Spiderman


Y'all Sony nerds got to understand most of us on XB1 play multiplayer games... that's all usually.


Multiplat story games are the biggest sellers, but no one gives af about playing these lonely ass rpg's

XB1X had Gears, Halo5, ALL of the Forza games, Titanfall/2 (creators of Apex), Sea of Thieves, State of Decay, Sunset Overdrive, Ashen, Ori, Cuphead, ReCore, Quantum Break, A Walk in the Dark, etc., and thats not including all the 360 games available and free shyt


We're good on games nikka

I didn't read this post but let me guess it goes like this:

Lonely RPGS
"i don't care about those games bro"

"I only played 1 game on that list and the rest were meh"

"All my boys play Xbox"

some something PS4 dust.

 

[DPresidential]

I didn't read this post but let me guess it goes like this:

Lonely RPGS
"i don't care about those games bro"

"I only played 1 game on that list and the rest were meh"

"All my boys play Xbox"

some something PS4 dust.

We on a forum where you're commenting in a thread on Xbox shyt and you state "I'm not going to read" and then you reply.

This is Uncharted territory for me

 

[Tenchi Ryu]

Huge missed opportunity not showing the backwards compatible stuff from inside xbox yesterday.

26 new back compat xbox and xbox 360 games and yall don't think that's worth showing?

 

[Fatboi1]

We on a forum where you're commenting in a thread on Xbox shyt and you state "I'm not going to read" and then you reply.

This is Uncharted territory for me

So I'm responding to someone's misinformation and dude quotes me saying the same old tired shtick that he's said on here a million times so I choose to ignore it since it's the same old song and dance but you're confused.

 

[Tenchi Ryu]

E3 stream didn’t do halo justice at all.

This shyt is next gen as hell

Incredible detail

 

[Rekkapryde]

E3 stream didn’t do halo justice at all.

This shyt is next gen as hell

Incredible detail

Nah B. Don't look bad but there's multiple games this gen that look better.

 

[Mike809]

if Halo's trailer was gameplay, then i would be impressed but its just cgi/cut-scene right?

 

[Supercoolmayo]

Is this a mircosoft e3 thread or shyt on Mircosoft thread?

 

[5n0man]

PS3 was more powerful, but not ridiculously. It's power was in its CPU but it was not easy to program for. 360 had a beast graphics card and was much easier to program for.

@Bryan Danielson

This what I mean when I say I'm not a typical Sony stan.

They will tell you that ps3 was stronger, but the only example of the ps3 out performing the 360 is final fantasy 13. And that's only because the game was built for the complicated ass cell processor, then hastily ported to the 360 last minute.

Only advantage the ps3 had was storage space due to bluray. That's why you had Sony stans claiming that shyt like metal gear 4 wouldn't be possible on 360, the real reason is cause majority of the game is uncompressed audio. Put it on multiple disk and that game would easily run on the 360, possibly better than it did on ps3.

The cell processor was not an advantage, it was a fukk up. What's the point of the cell processor being overly complicated when it didnt result in games performing better than the cheaper more powerful alternative?

Microsoft had last gen in the bag, and they snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

Microsoft's position last gen is what makes it so frustrating that they are only just now acquiring studios for more exclusives for next gen, this is something they should have done last gen, we shouldn't have to wait till next gen to see some non gears/halo AAA exclusives.

 

[Rekkapryde]

@Bryan Danielson

This what I mean when I say I'm not a typical Sony stan.

They will tell you that ps3 was stronger, but the only example of the ps3 out performing the 360 is final fantasy 13. And that's only because the game was built for the complicated ass cell processor, then hastily ported to the 360 last minute.

Only advantage the ps3 had was storage space due to bluray. That's why you had Sony stans claiming that shyt like metal gear 4 wouldn't be possible on 360, the real reason is cause majority of the game is uncompressed audio. Put it on multiple disk and that game would easily run on the 360, possibly better than it did on ps3.

The cell processor was not an advantage, it was a fukk up. What's the point of the cell processor being overly complicated when it didnt result in games performing better than the cheaper more powerful alternative?

Microsoft had last gen in the bag, and they snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

Microsoft's position last gen is what makes it so frustrating that they are only just now acquiring studios for more exclusives for next gen, this is something they should have done last gen, we shouldn't have to wait till next gen to see some non gears/halo AAA exclusives.

Sony exclusives did prove the power of the cell, but again for multiplats, you aren't going to see it's advantages because of the difficulty to program. That was the hindrance of it. Not disagreeing that it was the best move for them, but Ken wasn't wrong about it's power.

Xbox 360 vs. PlayStation 3: The Hardware Throwdown - IGN

It was a more powerful system, BUT the difficulty of programming for the cell hurt it other than Sony's internal studios and the few devs who did learn how to code for it.

Even then, still outsold the 360.

 

[5n0man]

Sony exclusives did prove the power of the cell, but again for multiplats, you aren't going to see it's advantages because of the difficulty to program. That was the hindrance of it. Not disagreeing that it was the best move for them, but Ken wasn't wrong about it's power.

Xbox 360 vs. PlayStation 3: The Hardware Throwdown - IGN

It was a more powerful system, BUT the difficulty of programming for the cell hurt it other than Sony's internal studios and the few devs who did learn how to code for it.

Even then, still outsold the 360.

More powerful but didnt actually translate to better games


Actually performed worse than the "weaker" system.

I already spoke on first party titles being good, but those studios work for Sony, it was their job to make that shytty cell processor work. Matter fact, I'll go as far as to say that the first party exclusives just proved that Sony has extremely talented studios working for them and not how powerful the ps3 itself was.


And make sure you put an asterisk next to ps3 outselling the 360 cause we all know Sony stopped releasing ps3 numbers and started bundling ps2 sales together to pad the ps3 numbers.

Yall clown Microsoft for not reporting numbers anymore when Sony was literally being deceptive with the ps3 numbers.

 

[Bryan Danielson]

Oh shyt!!