Xbox One frees up extra computing power for developers :win:

[winb83]

fukk outa here with this shyt. There been plenty of time when you and I have gone back and forth just for you to call me a fanboy, then I'm correct in the end.

Just like this post your Cosigning. You claimed kinect was trash and was t worth it and called me a fanboy for disagreeing. Now a year later you claim to like kinect.

I've openly admitted I was wrong about Kinect. When have you ever admitted you were wrong about anything?

Hell if Kinect came out of Sony's camp instead of Microsoft's you'd probably shyt on it. I have opinions but they're subject to change depending on my experiences, In any given scenario in relation to video games people can easily predict your stance on something just by analyzing the situation and seeing which stance is pro-Microsoft and anti-Microsoft. you will irrationally defend pro-Microsoft stances even when proven wrong and that's what the Sony fanboys are arguing makes you the WOAT.

Even with me liking the voice commands on my Kinect since I bought the privacy stand for it I have never taken it off. I've never used the camera. Kinect is a mic and an RF blaster to me. They could have put that into the controller or console itself and dropped the camera.

Even the head of Xbox is proud of killing the device off.

 

[Rice N Beans]

yes you tried to claim the "parity clause" had anything to do with performance. it doesnt. you just admited it doesnt, but then tried to spin it back to "trying to close the gap". You're talking in lying ass circles here.

Not once did I explicitly state there was a performance clause. You conjured that up. I only said MS keeps trying to do miniscule boosts and telling the media to make it look better than it really is and their CLA is another sore eye to how they want to keep things as close as possible. ON TOP OF THAT, you denied there being any clause at all until I mentioned Phil Spencer. I see you forgot about that one.

Absolutely not true.

To quote DigitalFoundry, your favorite shill site:

"Complex effects work, usually involving transparency effects (explosions etc) can also cause visible, sustained hitches in performance. Explosive missions with Trevor in Los Santos' outskirts show the biggest pitfall on Xbox One - with 24fps held at length during one shoot-out. Meanwhile, the PS4 has no issue with these segments, sparing one or two dropped frames just as alpha effects appear on-screen."

XB1 struggling and

"...the implementation of a lens flare effect that appears either absent or dialled back on Xbox One."
"...though foliage density and and lens flare are big factors."

better graphics.

Meach loses again.

Again not true at all

PS4 runs at 1080p and XB1 at 900p. That's a check for the res.

Now to quote DF again:

Dragon Age: Inquisition performance analysis reveals that while PS4 has the image quality advantage

Bettter graphics, check.

And watching the video, short instance of it dropping to 27, with it being 30fps or near give or take a frame or two.

Consistent performance along the lines of XB1, check.

Meach loses again.

Keep up the lies breh.

To quote DigitalFoundry:

"...the Xbox One version of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare uses a dynamic scaling model - rendering at resolutions between 1360x1080 to the full 1920x1080"
"on Xbox One, leading to a static 1360x1080 presentation throughout. Meanwhile, PS4 locks to native 1080p."
"While it's clear that resolution frequently hangs at the 1360x1080 point"

Better resolution, check.

"...the crisp, native 1080p image enjoyed on PlayStation 4

Better graphical quality, check.

Meach catches another fade.

Both launched at 1080P

Diablo 3 needed a Day One patch for 1080p, and thus did not release with 1080p support. Meach loses again.

Not a "recent" game and an exception to the norm, but gone head nd cook

Same as above. But you knew that already.

A CPU bound game runs better on Xbox

It runs like hot garbage across all platforms. It's not a CPU bound game, but a competence bound game.

.... let me guess, you have had zero issues with what has been constantly shown.

Still doing it

Still harping on it huh?

This is just factually untrue. No matter how many times you say it. Both are definitely in the same "league" as far as power goes. The games prove that.

The games prove the XB1 can't handle what the PS4 can despite these "boosts". PS4 is in another league.

No point in doing that, you'll just keep lying.

Please find the evidence that shows what I said is untrue. I'll even take a month ban for it. sas1:

No its not. Go read up dummy.

I did. But it's clear you didn't.

No in most cases performace is very similar. PS4 gets the edge but its isn't a "huge" "major" or "different league" as you claim

Sure it is. That's why XB1 has to settle on a lower framerate and less graphics to maintain console performance.

Post one dev saying the ps4 is "in a different league"

Using my words as exact speech from developers? You've run out of spins already Meach? You're trying to fit what I say as an exact quote from a dev? You're really terrible with debates.

I'll toss you a bone about performance though:

"It turns out that Lanning had been completely misinterpreted, and in truth it would be “physically impossible” for Xbox One performance to align with PlayStation 4’s"

Whole 'nutha league.

The games prove you wrong. No matter how many lies you tell

The games prove the XB1 isn't as strong as the PS4, which is exactly my original statement.


You need to drown in rice.


@Liquid Do we need a ten count for this one?[/I]

 

[#StarkSet]

Not once did I explicitly state there was a performance clause. You conjured that up. I only said MS keeps trying to do miniscule boosts and telling the media to make it look better than it really is and their CLA is another sore eye to how they want to keep things as close as possible. ON TOP OF THAT, you denied there being any clause at all until I mentioned Phil Spencer. I see you forgot about that one.






To quote DigitalFoundry, your favorite shill site:

"Complex effects work, usually involving transparency effects (explosions etc) can also cause visible, sustained hitches in performance. Explosive missions with Trevor in Los Santos' outskirts show the biggest pitfall on Xbox One - with 24fps held at length during one shoot-out. Meanwhile, the PS4 has no issue with these segments, sparing one or two dropped frames just as alpha effects appear on-screen."

XB1 struggling and

"...the implementation of a lens flare effect that appears either absent or dialled back on Xbox One."
"...though foliage density and and lens flare are big factors."

better graphics.

Meach loses again.





PS4 runs at 1080p and XB1 at 900p. That's a check for the res.

Now to quote DF again:

Dragon Age: Inquisition performance analysis reveals that while PS4 has the image quality advantage

Bettter graphics, check.

And watching the video, short instance of it dropping to 27, with it being 30fps or near give or take a frame or two.

Consistent performance along the lines of XB1, check.

Meach loses again.





To quote DigitalFoundry:

"...the Xbox One version of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare uses a dynamic scaling model - rendering at resolutions between 1360x1080 to the full 1920x1080"
"on Xbox One, leading to a static 1360x1080 presentation throughout. Meanwhile, PS4 locks to native 1080p."
"While it's clear that resolution frequently hangs at the 1360x1080 point"

Better resolution, check.

"...the crisp, native 1080p image enjoyed on PlayStation 4

Better graphical quality, check.

Meach catches another fade.



Diablo 3 needed a Day One patch for 1080p, and thus did not release with 1080p support. Meach loses again.










It runs like hot garbage across all platforms. It's not a CPU bound game, but a competence bound game.

.... let me guess, you have had zero issues with what has been constantly shown.



Still harping on it huh?



The games prove the XB1 can't handle what the PS4 can despite these "boosts". PS4 is in another league.



Please find the evidence that shows what I said is untrue. I'll even take a month ban for it. sas1:



I did. But it's clear you didn't.




Sure it is. That's why XB1 has to settle on a lower framerate and less graphics to maintain console performance.



Using my words as exact speech from developers? You've run out of spins already Meach? You're trying to fit what I say as an exact quote from a dev? You're really terrible with debates.

I'll toss you a bone about performance though:

"It turns out that Lanning had been completely misinterpreted, and in truth it would be “physically impossible” for Xbox One performance to align with PlayStation 4’s"

Whole 'nutha league.


The games prove the XB1 isn't as strong as the PS4, which is exactly my original statement.


You need to drown in rice.


@Liquid Do we need a ten count for this one?[/I]

get murdered on your own shyt

 

[MeachTheMonster]

Not once did I explicitly state there was a performance clause. You conjured that up. I only said MS keeps trying to do miniscule boosts and telling the media to make it look better than it really is and their CLA is another sore eye to how they want to keep things as close as possible. ON TOP OF THAT, you denied there being any clause at all until I mentioned Phil Spencer. I see you forgot about that one.

So why bring up a "parity clause" in a thread and conversation about performace?

You clearly tried to claim Microsoft was forcing devs to gimp PS4 games through a partly clause. Now your switching your story up

To quote DigitalFoundry, your favorite shill site:

"Complex effects work, usually involving transparency effects (explosions etc) can also cause visible, sustained hitches in performance. Explosive missions with Trevor in Los Santos' outskirts show the biggest pitfall on Xbox One - with 24fps held at length during one shoot-out. Meanwhile, the PS4 has no issue with these segments, sparing one or two dropped frames just as alpha effects appear on-screen."

XB1 struggling and

"...the implementation of a lens flare effect that appears either absent or dialled back on Xbox One."
"...though foliage density and and lens flare are big factors."

better graphics.

As I said pretty much the same damn shyt. You can't even tell the apart, unless of course you're looking through fanboy glasses.

PS4 runs at 1080p and XB1 at 900p. That's a check for the res.

Now to quote DF again:

Dragon Age: Inquisition performance analysis reveals that while PS4 has the image quality advantage

Bettter graphics, check.

Why didn't you finish the sentence

And watching the video, short instance of it dropping to 27, with it being 30fps or near give or take a frame or two.

Consistent performance along the lines of XB1, check.

Meach loses again.

Conveniently ignoring facts to support your agenda check

To quote DigitalFoundry:

"...the Xbox One version of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare uses a dynamic scaling model - rendering at resolutions between 1360x1080 to the full 1920x1080"
"on Xbox One, leading to a static 1360x1080 presentation throughout. Meanwhile, PS4 locks to native 1080p."
"While it's clear that resolution frequently hangs at the 1360x1080 point"

Better resolution, check.

"...the crisp, native 1080p image enjoyed on PlayStation 4

Better graphical quality, check.

And here you pretend resolution="graphical quality, and they are two separate things

Meach catches another fade.

Rice n beans cuts off another DF article before it gets to the part where Xbox has the advantage

Diablo 3 needed a Day One patch for 1080p, and thus did not release with 1080p support. Meach loses again.

Idiot semantics for no reason again

It runs like hot garbage across all platforms. It's not a CPU bound game, but a competence bound game.

Convenient excuse.

The games prove the XB1 can't handle what the PS4 can despite these "boosts". PS4 is in another league.

By your fanboy logic Xbox one CPU is "in another league" than PS4

Please find the evidence that shows what I said is untrue. I'll even take a month ban for it. sas1:

Prove the crap you said first

Sure it is. That's why XB1 has to settle on a lower framerate and less graphics to maintain console performance.

Same reason framerates hold up better on Xbox.

Using my words as exact speech from developers? You've run out of spins already Meach? You're trying to fit what I say as an exact quote from a dev? You're really terrible with debates.

I'll toss you a bone about performance though:

"It turns out that Lanning had been completely misinterpreted, and in truth it would be “physically impossible” for Xbox One performance to align with PlayStation 4’s"

Another case of rice n beans didn't finish the quote. I'll help you out.

"I spoke to Lorne afterwards and what he meant when speaking to that guy was that budgets, schedules and perceivable differences would narrow"

Whole 'nutha league.

Whole nutha quote when you finish it.

The games prove the XB1 isn't as strong as the PS4, which is exactly my original statement.

I never denied that. Just denied all the other fanboy shyt you threw on top of it.

You need to drown in rice.


@Liquid Do we need a ten count for this one?[/I]

Yes, call your lead fanboy. He'll surely vouch for you. He might even ban me from the thread.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I've openly admitted I was wrong about Kinect. When have you ever admitted you were wrong about anything?

Yes plenty of times.

Hell if Kinect came out of Sony's camp instead of Microsoft's you'd probably shyt on it.

Not true at all. I absolutely do not irrationally hate on Sony products. If it looks good I say it. Same as for Xbox.

I have opinions but they're subject to change depending on my experiences, In any given scenario in relation to video games people can easily predict your stance on something just by analyzing the situation and seeing which stance is pro-Microsoft and anti-Microsoft. you will irrationally defend pro-Microsoft stances even when proven wrong and that's what the Sony fanboys are arguing makes you the WOAT.

Too bad this isn't true. First off, for most subjects on here there isn't really a direct side to pick other than fanboy arguments. I may defend Xbox from irrational lies and misinformation, but that's it. Just like in this thread we got people claiming that using kinect lowers performace, diablo 3 runs at 30fps on Xbox, and that the hardware in the boxes are "leagues apart" all statements which are VERY untrue. Yet I get called a fanboy and the woat for pointing out the truth.

Even with me liking the voice commands on my Kinect since I bought the privacy stand for it I have never taken it off. I've never used the camera. Kinect is a mic and an RF blaster to me. They could have put that into the controller or console itself and dropped the camera.

Even the head of Xbox is proud of killing the device off.

Offering an option=/= "killing off the device". They removed some focus from it but they are still working on it. A couple great kinect games came out this Christmas, and I actually just read today that they are working on some new kinect technology.

 

[Liquid]

Not once did I explicitly state there was a performance clause. You conjured that up. I only said MS keeps trying to do miniscule boosts and telling the media to make it look better than it really is and their CLA is another sore eye to how they want to keep things as close as possible. ON TOP OF THAT, you denied there being any clause at all until I mentioned Phil Spencer. I see you forgot about that one.






To quote DigitalFoundry, your favorite shill site:

"Complex effects work, usually involving transparency effects (explosions etc) can also cause visible, sustained hitches in performance. Explosive missions with Trevor in Los Santos' outskirts show the biggest pitfall on Xbox One - with 24fps held at length during one shoot-out. Meanwhile, the PS4 has no issue with these segments, sparing one or two dropped frames just as alpha effects appear on-screen."

XB1 struggling and

"...the implementation of a lens flare effect that appears either absent or dialled back on Xbox One."
"...though foliage density and and lens flare are big factors."

better graphics.

Meach loses again.





PS4 runs at 1080p and XB1 at 900p. That's a check for the res.

Now to quote DF again:

Dragon Age: Inquisition performance analysis reveals that while PS4 has the image quality advantage

Bettter graphics, check.

And watching the video, short instance of it dropping to 27, with it being 30fps or near give or take a frame or two.

Consistent performance along the lines of XB1, check.

Meach loses again.





To quote DigitalFoundry:

"...the Xbox One version of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare uses a dynamic scaling model - rendering at resolutions between 1360x1080 to the full 1920x1080"
"on Xbox One, leading to a static 1360x1080 presentation throughout. Meanwhile, PS4 locks to native 1080p."
"While it's clear that resolution frequently hangs at the 1360x1080 point"

Better resolution, check.

"...the crisp, native 1080p image enjoyed on PlayStation 4

Better graphical quality, check.

Meach catches another fade.



Diablo 3 needed a Day One patch for 1080p, and thus did not release with 1080p support. Meach loses again.










It runs like hot garbage across all platforms. It's not a CPU bound game, but a competence bound game.

.... let me guess, you have had zero issues with what has been constantly shown.



Still harping on it huh?



The games prove the XB1 can't handle what the PS4 can despite these "boosts". PS4 is in another league.



Please find the evidence that shows what I said is untrue. I'll even take a month ban for it. sas1:



I did. But it's clear you didn't.




Sure it is. That's why XB1 has to settle on a lower framerate and less graphics to maintain console performance.



Using my words as exact speech from developers? You've run out of spins already Meach? You're trying to fit what I say as an exact quote from a dev? You're really terrible with debates.

I'll toss you a bone about performance though:

"It turns out that Lanning had been completely misinterpreted, and in truth it would be “physically impossible” for Xbox One performance to align with PlayStation 4’s"

Whole 'nutha league.


The games prove the XB1 isn't as strong as the PS4, which is exactly my original statement.


You need to drown in rice.


@Liquid Do we need a ten count for this one?[/I]

:silvugh:

 

[Rekkapryde]

:silvugh:

Dude already on the campaign trail for back to back WOAT

 

[Dominic Brehetto]

Argue with the woat brehs.

 

[Hood Critic]

Meach going to Meach...

 

[Rice N Beans]

So why bring up a "parity clause" in a thread and conversation about performace?

You clearly tried to claim Microsoft was forcing devs to gimp PS4 games through a partly clause. Now your switching your story up

No I did not, and I explicitly stated so. You lose again.

As I said pretty much the same damn shyt. You can't even tell the apart, unless of course you're looking through fanboy glasses.

I provided you with proof, as you said, and you begin the spin.

Why didn't you finish the sentence

Conveniently ignoring facts to support your agenda check

I did EXACTLY as you what wanted. I provided quotes and specs of where the PS4 builds are superior. Now that I shut you down you're moving the goalposts.

And here you pretend resolution="graphical quality, and they are two separate things

The Master Chief collection offers Halo1 in upgraded 1080p, enhancing the graphics quality over the 360 build with no changes in assets.

Rice n beans cuts off another DF article before it gets to the part where Xbox has the advantage

Once again, I provided the evidence and you're moving the goalposts again now that I shut you down. Now the problem is I didn't complete the quote, when you specifically asked for the information on the PS4's superiority and got it?

Meach is staggerin from all these hits.

Idiot semantics for no reason again

You argued they released it with 1080p, when in fact it came later in a patch. Not in gold = not with release. You lose again.

Convenient excuse.

Do I have to shut you down again with how bad this game runs? I don't think you deserve this much ether this early into the year.

By your fanboy logic Xbox one CPU is "in another league" than PS4

Of course it isn't. The very same CPU with a minor difference in clock speeds isn't the same as a different GPU design.

You're full of bad analogies.

Prove the crap you said first

Do you want the specs sheet or the analysis of? Both are warm and resting on the window sill. I'm ready to prove it and you're sitting there shytting your pants.

Same reason framerates hold up better on Xbox.

I'm not debating the lesser overall graphical quality of games on the XB1 is contributing to the +-1 frame differences.

Another case of rice n beans didn't finish the quote. I'll help you out.

"I spoke to Lorne afterwards and what he meant when speaking to that guy was that budgets, schedules and perceivable differences would narrow"

And my quote was exactly after, providing the evidence that a dev agrees the PS4 is superior to the XB1. Once again Meach moves the goalpost. *clap*

Whole nutha quote when you finish it.

The finishing line is "NOT that the Xbox One performance is improving to align with PS4, that is just physically impossible."

Whole 'nutha league.

[quote[I never denied that. Just denied all the other fanboy shyt you threw on top of it.[/quote]

Of course you did. In fact you are still hesitant on proving otherwise. I threw the evidence and the specs out there and you still are trying to move the goalposts. Not today Meachypoo.

Yes, call your lead fanboy. He'll surely vouch for you. He might even ban me from the thread.

@fatboi Meach in here face bloody and bruised, staggering.


Let's all give a flower for Meach.

 

[Fatboi1]

No I did not, and I explicitly stated so. You lose again.



I provided you with proof, as you said, and you begin the spin.


I did EXACTLY as you what wanted. I provided quotes and specs of where the PS4 builds are superior. Now that I shut you down you're moving the goalposts.


The Master Chief collection offers Halo1 in upgraded 1080p, enhancing the graphics quality over the 360 build with no changes in assets.



Once again, I provided the evidence and you're moving the goalposts again now that I shut you down. Now the problem is I didn't complete the quote, when you specifically asked for the information on the PS4's superiority and got it?

Meach is staggerin from all these hits.


You argued they released it with 1080p, when in fact it came later in a patch. Not in gold = not with release. You lose again.



Do I have to shut you down again with how bad this game runs? I don't think you deserve this much ether this early into the year.



Of course it isn't. The very same CPU with a minor difference in clock speeds isn't the same as a different GPU design.

You're full of bad analogies.


Do you want the specs sheet or the analysis of? Both are warm and resting on the window sill. I'm ready to prove it and you're sitting there shytting your pants.



I'm not debating the lesser overall graphical quality of games on the XB1 is contributing to the +-1 frame differences.



And my quote was exactly after, providing the evidence that a dev agrees the PS4 is superior to the XB1. Once again Meach moves the goalpost. *clap*



The finishing line is "NOT that the Xbox One performance is improving to align with PS4, that is just physically impossible."

Whole 'nutha league.

[quote[I never denied that. Just denied all the other fanboy shyt you threw on top of it.

Of course you did. In fact you are still hesitant on proving otherwise. I threw the evidence and the specs out there and you still are trying to move the goalposts. Not today Meachypoo.



@fatboi Meach in here face bloody and bruised, staggering.


Let's all give a flower for Meach.

:ohmy1:

 

[MeachTheMonster]

No I did not, and I explicitly stated so. You lose again.

You just said "Microsoft has a clause to close the gap"

Quit talking in circles.

I provided you with proof, as you said, and you begin the spin.


I did EXACTLY as you what wanted. I provided quotes and specs of where the PS4 builds are superior. Now that I shut you down you're moving the goalposts.

Never moved any goalposts. I said the games were close. The DF articles you posted prove that. So you tried to cut out the part where it says that.

Watch any one of the comparison videos and you can not tell the games apart.

The Master Chief collection offers Halo1 in upgraded 1080p, enhancing the graphics quality over the 360 build with no changes in assets.

This is so untrue. You really have no idea what you are talking about. Resolution does not equal graphics quality.

Once again, I provided the evidence and you're moving the goalposts again now that I shut you down. Now the problem is I didn't complete the quote, when you specifically asked for the information on the PS4's superiority and got it?

No I said prove its "in another league" I never once denied that the PS4 is stronger. What I denied is you pretending that the consoles are not close in power.

Meach is staggerin from all these hits.

Nothing but lies and half truths coming from you.

You argued they released it with 1080p, when in fact it came later in a patch. Not in gold = not with release. You lose again.

More lies and half truths.

Do I have to shut you down again with how bad this game runs? I don't think you deserve this much ether this early into the year.

It runs bad because it is a CPU bound game. It runs better on xbxo because the CPU is faster.

Of course it isn't. The very same CPU with a minor difference in clock speeds isn't the same as a different GPU design.

Again you have absolutely no clue what your talking about. The GPU's in both systems come from the same line from AMD. They are the same design.

You're full of bad analogies.

Trying to speak in dummy terms so you can understand

Do you want the specs sheet or the analysis of? Both are warm and resting on the window sill. I'm ready to prove it and you're sitting there shytting your pants.

Yes if they are from a real developer. Not a random interent Sony Stans. Post em

I'm not debating the lesser overall graphical quality of games on the XB1 is contributing to the +-1 frame differences.

It's more than one frame. And there is no "lesser graphical quality".

More lies and half truths from you

And my quote was exactly after, providing the evidence that a dev agrees the PS4 is superior to the XB1. Once again Meach moves the goalpost. *clap*




The finishing line is "NOT that the Xbox One performance is improving to align with PS4, that is just physically impossible."

Whole 'nutha league.

There's two separate concepts here. The physical hardware will never change. The perceivable differences of games will and already is narrowing.

This is a dev telling you exactly what I've been saying. Yes the PS4 is more powerful NO, that doesn't translate into a big difference in screen

Of course you did. In fact you are still hesitant on proving otherwise. I threw the evidence and the specs out there and you still are trying to move the goalposts. Not today Meachypoo.



@fatboi Meach in here face bloody and bruised, staggering.


Let's all give a flower for Meach.

Call more cheerleaders to cosign your lies, I'm ready

 

[BasedPrime]

Year starts off strong

 

[dBoyFresh*212]

kylebify bean2 months ago

XBOX one is starting to piss me off just got the evolve alpha and the gay system is still kicking me out the entire game. No other console i had this problem and its laggy as shyt Microsoft fix the fukking xbox one
Reply ·

mastertjackson2 weeks ago

I swear! If Microsoft dont fix this im going to PS4, NO BULLshyt
Reply · 1

DoMiNuSxX11 month ago

This happens to me 2!!Annoying
Reply ·

Chris Young1 month ago

Just buy a ps4 problem solved
Reply ·

SavageTEK Australia11 months ago

Customize your message
Reply ·

Jesse Church6 months ago

My xbox one is fukking slow to, bullshyt I've just moved to Aus from NZ looking for some xbox one gamers in Aus to game with if your keen, I left my 360 back home should of brought that over instead of this piece of shyt
Reply ·

 

[Rice N Beans]

You just said "Microsoft has a clause to close the gap"

Quit talking in circles.

They do, and it restricts content and launch dates. I never explicitly stated performance Meach. You're the one who wants it to be that way but the elephant doesn't forget.

Never moved any goalposts. I said the games were close.

Watch any one of the comparison videos and you can not tell the games apart.

You sure did move the goalposts. You asked for proof of the PS4's superiority graphically over the XB1, and got exactly that. What was your response? A change in tune. Suddenly, you did not want PS4 information, but the leftover XB1 information.

The goalposts have your fingerprints all over them.

This is so untrue. You really have no idea what you are talking about. Resolution does not equal graphics quality.

Meach backed down from another one.

No I said prove its "in another league" I never once denied that the PS4 is stronger. What I denied is you pretending that the consoles are not close in power.

PS4 being stronger, it is no longer equal to the XB1 but above it, in another league of it's own.

Nothing but lies and half truths coming from you. More lies and half truths.

Not in it when code is locked and game is gold = not in release. Print that one out and study it.

It runs bad because it is a CPU bound game. It runs better on xbxo because the CPU is faster.

It runs bad because the team who made it lacks competence. I think you should apply for a job there.

Again you have absolutely no clue what your talking about. The GPU's in both systems come from the same line from AMD. They are the same design.

No, in fact, that isn't true. They are based on the same architecture but not designed the same. Microsoft chose a design that features the ESRAM at the expense of GPU power, and Sony chose a design that fitted more shader cores, compute unites, and ROPs onto the GPU.

To quote DF yet again, on their XB1 specs article:

"Sony has used the die-space for additional compute units and ROPs (32 vs. 16 in One), while Microsoft has budgeted for ESRAM and data move engines instead."

Trying to speak in dummy terms so you can understand

It's not workin' Meach. Like the cloud.

Yes if they are from a real developer. Not a random interent Sony Stans. Post em

And here we have it! Another Meach goalpost move! From "you're lying!" to, "why prove it, you'll just lie!" to "prove it". What happens when I try and get down into it? It HAS to be a developer! Because developers jobs are to mull over specifications in the journalism world right? Oh Meach, you're such a bad troll. But I'll prove it right and shut you down again.

Ars Technica, a popular and well respected independent website, glosses over both hardware.[/url]

The Verge, one of the more popular gadget sites, glosses over the hardware.

You can find more detailed specs sheet at IGN, complete with sources.[1][2]

You can also find specs at Wikipedia and hardware photographs at ifixit. [1][2]

It's more than one frame. And there is no "lesser graphical quality".

More lies and half truths from you

You do know frame performance is totaled in averaged for consoles right? The average is, give or take, a frame at most, on your overall experience.

Secondly, already quoted the graphical differences that lie in PS4's favor. You can close your eyes and claps your ears but that won't make it any less true.

There's two separate concepts here. The physical hardware will never change. The perceivable differences of games will and already is narrowing.

Ensuring the PS4 will have the stronger console for the duration of the generation. Thus, providing the improved graphics as I stated earlier beyond the Xbox One alongside similar framerates.

This is a dev telling you exactly what I've been saying. Yes the PS4 is more powerful NO, that doesn't translate into a big difference in screen

Except I've already shown the DF quotes where yes, there are differences on the big screen, like scaling resolutions () and less density/effects the XB1 has to suffer with to maintain framerate.




Your wheels are falling off and you're trying to steer this into a whole different direction. If you can't stay on topic, bytchBeGone. This is a No Spin Zone.