I'll keep saying it. Phil's console wasn't going to be anything but this. 499 easy. He wanted all the power and said fukk the other shyt.
These specs line up with what Klee said before to which you dismissed saying he was some sort of Sony fan.
From 2 months ago:
Other comments he said:
"There is no double digit performance difference.
Both PS5/Scarlett have double digit performance (I.e. over 10.0TF) "
"PlayStation 5 is supposedly slightly more powerful than the Xbox Scarlett."
"To be fair, Matt predicted Scarlett is more powerful and he is probably more connected than I am, so....That said, I was told that yes, PS5 is more powerful. "
"my friend... who is developing software for both Next-gen consoles said PS5 has the edge."
"
They are virtually the same "
"They both use Navi-based GPUs and are more powerful and feature rich than a 5700xt"
"Nah. It's fast, it just seems like Sony's SSD system (hardware /software)might be really, really fast."
He stated that PS5 would be slightly above that(TF). MSFT confirming 12teraflops and RDNA 2
most likely points to Sony having the same architecture since they're both using AMD for their parts. That 9TF rumor is looking unfounded now and points to Sony being either 11~13tf(Klee did say PS5 devkit at the time was slightly more powerful ) but who knows. This little narrative I've been seeing that people think the gap in performance between the two will be on some PS2 vs Original Xbox shyt despite releasing in the same time frame looks ridiculous.
If PS5 is actually 11~13TF it'll be funny looking back.