Dr. Narcisse
Veteran
nikkas that have wives that are down for that shyt swear they won.
wife hoes brehs.![]()
A wife who is down for that did more than you knew about. And do more than you know about.

nikkas that have wives that are down for that shyt swear they won.
wife hoes brehs.![]()


ts because I'm the last person she'll ever touch in a romantic or sexual way.
My girl already gave me the green light for a threesome but she wants me to choose the chick

Its not in the sense of ownership, its more along the lines of "We took vows to be the only one for each other," that includes sexually. If I'm not having sex with someone else, she shouldn't either. She wants to fukk somebody else? Divorce me. I went through this shyt for a period of time when it was LDR, she hadn't had sex in a while, there was a casual friend, and even though I gave her the green-light, it still bothers me to this day. I'm not talking about owning, this is just a trust issue.Why?
It's funny because if you have children, or have any children in your life you'll understand the mechanics of the child doing something, or wanting something just because they were told they can't have it, or can't do it.
This idea of "ok, we're married/together, you can't interact with anyone else" actually triggers that response of a free soul wanting to reclaim that autonomy. Of course with enough religion, guilt and shame people can keep their actual feelings at bay but what is the point?
All of this "get married" breh's shyt is just more examples of trying to fit a square peg in a round hole....and ultimately a lot of these "relationships" aren't built how well you actually relate to that person...IE companionship. Once you begin using language like "i'm the last ___ you'll ever do this with" you have now become an owner rather than a companion...and looking at the history of marriage the whole "romance" aspect of it was thrown in well after the fact, it used to be a straight up and down business transaction. Even in prehistory fidelity had nothing to do with happiness, it was more of a non-verbal contract that stated I catch the food, and protect you, give up the p*ssy, bare my children and help me maintain my image as big daddy king shyt.
The fanfare and romanticizing of what basically amounted to indentured servitude was just another way to pacify the emotional holes that being "owned" created. Even people that COULD or even SHOULD spend their lives together would probably be better at maintaining that companionship if they left behind the conditioning that calls for them to relate to one as possessions.
bytch go buy a vibratorIts not in the sense of ownership, its more along the lines of "We took vows to be the only one for each other," that includes sexually. If I'm not having sex with someone else, she shouldn't either. She wants to fukk somebody else? Divorce me. I went through this shyt for a period of time when it was LDR, she hadn't had sex in a while, there was a casual friend, and even though I gave her the green-light, it still bothers me to this day. I'm not talking about owning, this is just a trust issue.
It's actual work to set that up.
However, I do not and would not penetrate another woman. My lady says she wouldn't mind but I know better.