You OvoHoes and other morons actually thought Drake signed a 400 million dollar contract without it being 360

☑

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,240
Reputation
-34,881
Daps
640,785
Reppin
The Deep State
AnonymityX1000 said:
He's not selling like he did prior to the battle. The 2 singles he released did not go #1. He usually does that right?
Click to expand...
Not really, no. “usually…” no. Drake has a lot of billboard entries, thats it.

Yall just make insane arguments.

“OMG song didn’t go #1”…ok? And? Good god, did Tyler the Creator or something? :dahell: What is the argument here?

OK, let’s say he never does again… so? Thats a music quality issue.
 
AnonymityX1000

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
33,415
Reputation
3,903
Daps
77,962
Reppin
New York
☑︎#VoteDemocrat said:
OK. Thats a different argument and irrelevant to this thread topic. You have to understand this. This isn’t a “drake crisis strategy development” thread.

This is a “What is Drake’s actual contract per year” thread.
Click to expand...
I outlined to you how they are connected in a previous post. Please reread the thread.
 
Red Money

Red Money

All Star
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
2,805
Reputation
-171
Daps
4,095
AnonymityX1000 said:
You don't own the majority of your masters and publishing. Over time the payouts for both would have exceed the immediate $400 million.
Click to expand...

You never know when the public will turn...
Hundred of millions invested in stocks & bonds is a viable option.

You can pay back the advance over years from your work and you never have to pay it back in cash...and labels don't charge interest to counter inflation to my knowledge (that's a great ass loan). Label takes the risk you want enough success to pay it back fast so you get full royalties as quickly as possible.

And besides.... Universal Monte Carlo prediction models probably included if he quit after her took the $400milly that Universal could get it back based off back catalog alone.
 
AnonymityX1000

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
33,415
Reputation
3,903
Daps
77,962
Reppin
New York
☑︎#VoteDemocrat said:
Not really, no. “usually…” no. Drake has a lot of billboard entries, thats it.

Yall just make insane arguments.

“OMG song didn’t go #1”…ok? And? Good god, did Tyler the Creator or something? :dahell: What is the argument here?

OK, let’s say he never does again… so? Thats a music quality issue.
Click to expand...
What does, ". . . having more slaps than the Beatles." mean? Just charting or going #1?
He takes pride in his singles going #1 not just charting.
No, it's a popularity issue. He's a pop artist.
 
☑

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
337,240
Reputation
-34,881
Daps
640,785
Reppin
The Deep State
AnonymityX1000 said:
What does, ". . . having more slaps than the Beatles." mean? Just charting or going #1?
He takes pride in his singles going #1 not just charting.
No, it's a popularity issue. He's a pop artist.
Click to expand...
Ask him. You seem to be comfortable extrapolating benign statements. The Beatles never had the most #1’s, so why would you include that in your statement?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top