That’s not fair though to Rj he improved After last season even with Fiz trying to screw him up an hes 20 . Randle is most likely closer to his ceiling if we being honestAnd y’all tryna build around two leftys that bully ball with questionable J’s![]()
That’s not fair though to Rj he improved After last season even with Fiz trying to screw him up an hes 20 . Randle is most likely closer to his ceiling if we being honestAnd y’all tryna build around two leftys that bully ball with questionable J’s![]()
If he gets paid I’m sure he will stay .Respectfully Mitch & Myles are not going to be on the same team. Mitch wouldn’t stand for it.
If this is true it means two things.
-The staff has moved on from Mitch & they have complete faith in Julius. You only get a Myles to help out Julius. Myles doesn’t even help out Barrett
We need a star...simple as that. Maybe we can finally get lucky and draft one, maybe one decides he wants the bright lights of NYC...but whatever the source...we need a star.

Yes noel was a shell of himself since the ankle injuryI think they'll want to keep one of Mitch/Noel but bring in a stretch big instead of having two redundant pieces. Mitch being a REALLY good PnR defender along with Myles being the stretch 5 would give us two ways to attack teams that were sorely missing this post season (I think Noel would have been better without his bum ankle too).
You should be able to get Myles without giving up Mitch.Sign cp3
Trade Mitch for myles
Rolling out cp3, RJ, small forward X, randle, myles with quickly off the bench and some other viable short term pieces would be an interesting roster
Not saying they should but just spitballing
Myles as a spot up 3 option on offense and a true paint protecter on d is an interesting piece. I have lost a bit of patience with Mitch rob, between the injuries and his lack of growth (imo). He's just so inconsistent.
You should be able to get Myles without giving up Mitch.
Randle is getting traded. I don't see them using 2 guys with similar styles on offense. Judging by Rose interview, I predict big moves this off-season and plenty of money to give max options out. I predict a Dame, Hield or Butler for Knox, Randle, Burk, 3 picks or something.And y’all tryna build around two leftys that bully ball with questionable J’s![]()
Randle is getting traded. I don't see them using 2 guys with similar styles on offense. Judging by Rose interview, I predict big moves this off-season and plenty of money to give max options out. I predict a Dame, Hield or Butler for Knox, Randle, Burk, 3 picks or something.
Butler 
I wouldn't offer him the max but if we can get Dame, we can entice him for a little under.Butler
don’t bring that energy here breh![]()
Randle is not getting traded. The Knicks have already offered him the 4/116 deal. It’s up to him to sign itRandle is getting traded. I don't see them using 2 guys with similar styles on offense. Judging by Rose interview, I predict big moves this off-season and plenty of money to give max options out. I predict a Dame, Hield or Butler for Knox, Randle, Burk, 3 picks or something.
Is that a official?Randle is not getting traded. The Knicks have already offered him the 4/116 deal. It’s up to him to sign it

Those are both the centers. They wouldn’t play with each other but around each other. Depending on the match up they would probably switch who starts.Really?
If the price is that low I'd be for it. I don't think he really fits on the floor with Mitch tho. Maybe explore a trade of Mitch for a SF? Package him with one of their picks to upgrade that spot.