daboywonder2002
Superstar
i could see if the packers had aj green or calvin johnson. but jordy nelson and randall cobb?? come on man
ZERO passes thrown at Richard Sherman tonight
- Thread starter jadillac
- Start date
Black Ball
Superstar
i dont even understand why people cant understand simple football 101.
nobody asking seattle to stop doing something htat works...my point is that sherman cant claim to be the best if he facing the 4wr for 90% of the game...what kind of shyt is that? Thats like Paul George saying I can beat every point guard in one on one. WELL NO shyt nikka YOU GOT 8inches on all of em
You could look at it that way, or you could realize that a coach is choosing to limit his whole offense to only throwing to one side of the field and into double coverage the whole game. Forcing the QB to throw across his body and to his weak side. Seattle can also design pressure to take advantage of a team choosing to limit themselves in that way. So you gonna let 1 player dictate that much of your game plan? You can't even use your best receiver as a decoy to set up something big on the other side of the field. shyt is a total concession on the offenses part.
Now considering all of that, how is it advantageous to an offense to limit themselves in that way? Is your #1 receiver out there beasting against double coverage? Probably not.
Again, how you gonna let 1 football player dictate that much of your offense?
Packers not throwing at Sherman helps his reputation doesn't prove his skill. People seem to be missing this. Also all that shyt about offenses not supposed to adjust to defenses is wtf status
The numbers back up his reputation. How the fukk did you think he got it?
superunknown23
Superstar
the goalposts being moved by Sherman haters in this thread 
yseJ
Empire strikes back
coaches arent really doing that though. they shuffle the WRs because doing what you said they should do doesnt yield any better results
What are you talking about. This is exactly what those coaches ARE DOING
The strategy I talked about isn't me trying front like I'm smarter than any professional football coach. Its just simply the most logical thing to from a football perspective against that type scheme(from a personell point of view).
shuffling recievers where. And greenbay did this exact same thing last night.
Its right thing to do even if you dont beat seattle. Fact is Seattle as a defense is just really good. Doesnt mean the strategy is wrong.
ItzDaKiing
Freedom
This. Idk where these dudes getting that from. Every time the Seahawks are mentioned earls name comes up as either one of the best on that team or the best period.
yseJ
Empire strikes back
breh
do you watch seattle games ?
guys like julio jones, boldin, crabs, colston, aren't #3 or #4 wrs and go against sherman
demariyus went a ton against sherman in the superbowl
coaches dont do that stuff as often as you claim they do
theres concrete proof of it
Breh most teams dont even have 2 top flight recievers to do that even if they wanted too. Again I not saying he never sees good wrs but for someone who claims to be the best he doesnt defend the number 1's enough to make that claim. And the reason for this is the way seattle uses him. Which logically offenses will then put thier best on the other side
I AM WARHOL
Veteran
But is that Sherman stopping him?
AVXL
Laughing at you n*ggaz like “ha ha ha”
Breh Sherman ain't shut down shyt. The Falcons strategy was to go at Sherman and they did, Roddy & Julio beat Sherman on numerous occasions in that game, it wasn't just the TD Roddy scored over the top.
If you've got a gameplan & QB who isn't afraid to take chances you can beat SEA's defense. We did it in the playoffs a few years ago & it can happen again