ZIMBABWE PRESIDENT ROBERT MUGABE: WE WILL NOT PROSECUTE KILLERS OF WHITE FARMERS

[David_TheMan]

Both of these things are true.

I'm just saying. What's the negatives in allowing them to be murdered?

Removal of the rule of law is the biggest negative as I typed before

 

[Eddy Gordo]

Removal of the rule of law is the biggest negative as I typed before

It's not removed though. Just bent a little bit and not applied equally to everyone in the country. This is the case in MANY nations. Though most don't publicize it.

 

[David_TheMan]

It's not removed though. Just bent a little bit and not applied equally to everyone in the country. This is the case in MANY nations. Though most don't publicize it.

Like I said earlier, if the law doesn't apply equally to everyone there is no rule of law.
As for the notion that everyone else does _________, thats the tu quoque fallacy.

 

[Red Shield]

It's not removed though. Just bent a little bit and not applied equally to everyone in the country. This is the case in MANY nations. Though most don't publicize it.:yeshrug:

pretty much. Can't be yelling like that when the spotlight is already on ya.

 

[pimpineasy]

This is a cac.

I'm hella curious as to what makes me a "cac"

Y'all mentally enslaved brothers.

And for the record not that it matters I'm black.

Grew up in Jamaica in mobay ghetto. Again miss me with all y'all foolishness.

If y'all cant see how Mugabe has plundered Zimbabwe I don't know what to tell you.

Do me a favor. Log off and go talk to some African about the politics of the situation. You may be suprised.

 

[Eddy Gordo]

Like I said earlier, if the law doesn't apply equally to everyone there is no rule of law.
As for the notion that everyone else does _________, thats the tu quoque fallacy.

Fallacy or no. By your own metric the rule of law exists nowhere. Why should Mugabe and Zimbabwe submit to your morality? Tangibles please.

 

[David_TheMan]

Fallacy or no. By your own metric the rule of law exists nowhere. Why should Mugabe and Zimbabwe submit to your morality? Tangibles please.

If it doesn't exist anywhere and I critique it in the US and all over, why would I not critique it when Mugabe abandons it as well?

 

[Eddy Gordo]

If it doesn't exist anywhere and I critique it in the US and all over, why would I not critique it when Mugabe abandons it as well?

Because your a idealist.

 

[David_TheMan]

Because your a idealist.

So I wouldn't critique mugabe like I critique everyone else because i"m an idealist?
That literally makes no sense.

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

I'm hella curious as to what makes me a "cac"

Y'all mentally enslaved brothers.

And for the record not that it matters I'm black.

Grew up in Jamaica in mobay ghetto. Again miss me with all y'all foolishness.

If y'all cant see how Mugabe has plundered Zimbabwe I don't know what to tell you.

Do me a favor. Log off and go talk to some African about the politics of the situation. You may be suprised.

Ard, bul.

 

[PerrinN]

I'm hella curious as to what makes me a "cac"

Y'all mentally enslaved brothers.

And for the record not that it matters I'm black.

Grew up in Jamaica in mobay ghetto. Again miss me with all y'all foolishness.

If y'all cant see how Mugabe has plundered Zimbabwe I don't know what to tell you.

Do me a favor. Log off and go talk to some African about the politics of the situation. You may be suprised.

I'll never understand it man, you can dislike what the white people did and also dislike what Mugabe is currently doing. I still don't get why people defend a man who basically committed a genocide against his own people and running his country into the ground.

It cannot be stressed enough, If Mugabe was doing this all for the betterment of black people I'd understand it, but he's not. He's living good, allowing multinational corporations to get richer while everyone else in the country.

If he truly was so against white people, why allow these businesses in your country? It's almost as he uses the rightly hatred of the whites in Zimbabwe as a cover to gain popularity among some people in his country while he kills people who disagrees with him and get him and his family to live a good life while the rest of the country suffer.

It's so obvious

 

[Mowgli]

Things often end the same way they begin...

Unlike the African press, the Western media rarely invoke the name of Cecil John Rhodes: nearly a century after his death – on 26 March 1902 – his name is more associated with Oxford Scholarships than with murder. It’s easier to focus on the region’s more recent, less Anglo white supremacists: Ian Smith, for instance, who – despite his Scottish background – seems cut from the same stuff as those Afrikaner politicians who nurtured and maintained apartheid farther south.

But it was Rhodes who originated the racist “land grabs” to which Zimbabwe’s current miseries can ultimately be traced. It was Rhodes, too, who in 1887 told the House of Assembly in Cape Town that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”. In less oratorical moments, he put it even more bluntly: “I prefer land to ******s.”

 

[Crude Abolitionist]

You always fix/adjust your own army soldiers before going into battle with the enemy don't you know anything at all?

Also you're very sneakily trying to change the narrative of the conversation to black on black crime by emotionally shaming us into having some sort of attachment for traitorous black people. Don't think for a second I don't know what you're trying to do.....You're clever but not THAT clever alright?

lol for real.

 

[Red Shield]

Things often end the same way they begin...

Unlike the African press, the Western media rarely invoke the name of Cecil John Rhodes: nearly a century after his death – on 26 March 1902 – his name is more associated with Oxford Scholarships than with murder. It’s easier to focus on the region’s more recent, less Anglo white supremacists: Ian Smith, for instance, who – despite his Scottish background – seems cut from the same stuff as those Afrikaner politicians who nurtured and maintained apartheid farther south.

But it was Rhodes who originated the racist “land grabs” to which Zimbabwe’s current miseries can ultimately be traced. It was Rhodes, too, who in 1887 told the House of Assembly in Cape Town that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”. In less oratorical moments, he put it even more bluntly: “I prefer land to ******s.”

yep



those whites should be happy their still alive. they should have all left with the whites who left at independence. time is ticking down for them..


once the usa is dealt with once n for all.. it will be game time

 

[pimpineasy]

yep



those whites should be happy their still alive. they should have all left with the whites who left at independence. time is ticking down for them..


once the usa is dealt with once n for all.. it will be game time

Once the USA is deal with once and for all?
Is this some kind of alt right kkk bs