Draymond played poorly, but it's got nothing to do with Zubac, because he wasn't even matched up with him. What the fukk is wrong with you?
Zubac 18 Points 90% FG% 11 Rebounds vs Draymond
- Thread starter Torrential
- Start date
Yo if Gil has me on ignore that's the biggest win on the coli. Everyone else says they gotta put gil on ignore because he goes at them non-stop, but he had to put me on ignore because my foot started crushing his neck. 
cartierhoe
Veteran
I honestly think they should look into trading Draymond he is not as valuable as he once was with such a change in general style of play in the league and rule changes.But his offensive abilities were a definite feature GS came to rely upon...him not having that makes his performance an embarrassment compared to season past......
get these nets
Veteran
Have a look for yourself.
Draymond played at the 4, and Looney played at the 5 for the Warriors. Again, if you had bothered to even watch the game you'd know that Draymond wasn't playing center. How many times do you need to be told that Draymond barely even matched up with Zubac, as Looney was guarding him primarily? You can stop embarrassing yourself now.
Nah doesn't or wouldn't DG be guarding the opposing 4 or 5 who is the bigger offensive threat or who becomes that during the course of the game?
I've seen 4s guard 5s ......especially ones who are great defensive players .
I posted vids of young Piston Rodman being inserted into game because rookie Shaq was wiping his ass with Laimbeer. DG should have asked to switch assignments.
panopticon
Superstar
Monster...Halloween in musical formThis a classic
Beast Mode...brought back that soulful Zaytoven piano trap shyt
56 Nights...no commentary necessary :wowpaper:
Legendary run
Draymond will go somewhere else and ball out....watch. He just can’t co-exist in GS now that the front office has let it be known he’s non-essential to them and Durant is their golden boy....his feelings are hurt and his confidence is shook (reason the shot is gone)......both parties need to part ways
You say this as if you don't have a WOAT badge.... could you be any more transparent that you don't have any self-awareness, whatsoever?
I don't believe there's a single "best defender of all-time"; Draymond, however, is most certainly one of the best defenders to step foot on the court. Anyone paying attention and knows what they're talking about wouldn't contest that, especially since former players/coaches have said the same (you know the opinions of those whom this board values above all else).
But gon'head and carry on with y'all jokes, cause we all know y'all won't be wanting to joke around when June rolls around.
So why say ''regardless if i said it or not"? So you did say it before?
cartierhoe
Veteran
Facts, you had me listening to Monster during my workout. nikka went Beast ModeMonster...Halloween in musical form
Beast Mode...brought back that soulful Zaytoven piano trap shyt
56 Nights...no commentary necessary :wowpaper:
Legendary run
Wrong. Pistons didn't have a dominant big man. That 1989 championship team was led on offense by three guards who combined for 65 points/game in the Finals, they didn't have a single big average double figures even though they were playing a Lakers team that was starting A.C. Green (1 block the whole series) and 41yo Kareem (3 blocks the whole series). They didn't have a dominant big in 1990 either.
If you want to take away the Bulls run, then you have to give titles to the 1991 Lakers and the 1992 Blazers, both of whom were without dominant big men. Lakers were starting A.C. Green and Vlade, Blazers were starting Buck Williams and Kevin Duckworth. And the "big man" on the 1993 Suns was a 6'5" Charles Barkley who spent plenty of time on the perimeter.
That's five straight years from 1989 to 1993 without a single dominant big over 6'6" being necessary to win a title even if you leave the Bulls out of the picture. And counting the 1987 and 1988 Lakers with a 40yo Kareem is borderline too, he certainly wasn't "dominant" in their wins. Even the Jazz of the 1990s, Karl Malone wouldn't be any more of a problem for Draymond than he already was for all of the 4's who tried to guard him in his own era. Same goes for Shawn Kemp, or Kevin McHale. Those are all great players, but there still traditional 4's who are 6'10" or shorter and Draymond has tended to guard such players as well as anyone.
Plenty of teams right after the merger that you could say the same thing about. Sonics, Bullets, that first Boston ring before McHale was ready.
Not to mention that for most of NBA history, 7-foot tall Kevin Durant would have been considered a dominant "big man" anyway. Please don't tell me that 6'11" 230lb Jack Sikma, 6'10" 210lb Kevin McHale, 7'0" 240lb Dirk, or 6'11" 235lb Bosh are "dominant bigs" and KD ain't.
Last edited:
@Gil Scott-Heroin taking Ls. So lets say he didn’t guard Zubac, isn’t the most dynamic and versatile defender supposed to be able to guard 1-5? So why didn’t he guard Zubac? That’s an even bigger L than actually guarding him.
Wait... wait
So this CAC Zubaks is dominating the Warriors in the paint
But I'm supposed to believe this team would dominate the 90s and 2000s which was littered with hall of fame Big Men???
These nikkas smoking crack. And they always scatter like roaches when their team gets exposed. Shaq would average 45 and 20 and have their whole team fouled out. They’re out their rabbit ass mind. I would purposely tell Kobe to take it easy all series just to watch Shaq demoralize them. They’d have no answer for him whatsoever.
