2017-2018 NBA rookie of the year PREDICTIONS (SUMMER) Top 13 + 1

Who wins ROY this year?


  • Total voters
    160
  • Poll closed .

Supreme365

Superstar
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
5,864
Reputation
1,290
Daps
18,535
Reppin
DC
No one talks about Lonzo's rebounding ability + his range

I see him as a 12-8-5 player as a rook

If he comes out the gate at 10 dimes, you're looking at a historically great PG

Yeah yeah all that's cool but lonzo ain't leading the bum ass lakers to the playoffs in his first season
 

AAKing23

92' til Infinity....
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
43,991
Reputation
7,753
Daps
161,840
Reppin
NJ-PA
Again, he's still going to be battling for touches. Just because he's going to be running the offense doesn't mean he's going to be one of the primary offensive options - all the other players will need their fair share of touches to develop, plus Fultz, Saric and Biid all can create their own shots. It's not going to be a case of everyone stands and waits until Simmons sets them up on every possession.

The 76ers were #1 in passes by a HUGE margin last season (yes, that's partly because they didn't have a legit PG to run the offense), but I don't see a drastic change in method next season - the ball is still going to move regardless of who's playing PG. Brown's a Spurs guy, he's incorporated the same principles from SA into the system in Philly, so although he'll give Simmons more rein to set players up there's still going to be the same offensive structure.
Ben Simmons is gonna enhance all of our player's skill sets. Last year Embiid and Saric (although they can do it) had to work so hard to create their own shots because they lacked someone who could deliver the ball to them in spots to score. With Ben shyt is gonna be so much easier with a primary ball handler who has transcendent passing and court vision. As a matter of fact I could see a case where Ben doesn't win ROY and that would be if he makes our other guys look so good that he becomes an afterthought in a sense.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
91,372
Reputation
10,611
Daps
244,715
again: he's not battling for touches if he's running the show....for the most part, the offense is gonna be running through him, so he's gonna have the ball in his hands the majority of the time, setting up the offense, etc., being the primary option...and that's not battling for touches....and no, i'm not saying people gonna be standing around waiting to be setup by ben, just saying he will initiate a lot of the offense...which adds to his roy case....
He'll be battling for touches in the sense that the other players on the team will have the ball in their hands to develop and fine tune their respective games, and the fact they're a young team who're still in the process of finding their identity - Brown will make sure each and every player gets their fair share of touches in different types of situations. Saric, Biid and Fultz aren't role players, they're all going to have important roles or at least they'll have the opportunity to see if they're deserving of having an important role.

It's not going to be a case where they shape the entire offense around Simmons, and everyone else is secondary, it'll be a long process of working out an infinite amount of things.

At this stage we don't know what role each player will play, what their workloads will be, we don't know which player will sink/swim, we don't know if one of Fultz, Saric or Biid takes a gigantic leap etc. There are many unknowns about this squad, and until we actually see the product on the floor for a generous period of time there's no sense in acting like Simmons is going to run away with the ROY.

I don't think you quite understand how this works.
as for them developing: the game aint the place to 'develop' players....that shyt is done in practice, workouts, training, etc...the game is the place where they gonna execute the shyt they learned, and again he's gonna be running that show....side note: as for them developing, i think it would be best they develop as a team, to push each other while getting that chemistry.....
:dwillhuh:

What the hell do you mean the game isn't a place to "develop" players? Players don't develop in "practice, workouts, training" - that's mostly prep work for the actual game. Players only develop when they get minutes, where they can get accustomed to the pace, competition, physicality, trends/patterns, environment etc of actual NBA play.

I can't believe one would even think to suggest that the "game" isn't a place to develop players. How the fukk do you think players get better in the first place?

We talking about practice for how players develop; practice, not the actual game, but practice? :aicmon:
even running the spurs type offense, where the ball moves around, there is still 1 guy it tends to flow through....whether it was duncan, parker, ginobli (sp), and now kawhi....the same is gonna happen in philly with ben...they will move the ball around, but it will flow mostly through ben, then embiid....but even then, embiid has to have someone give him the ball, and in most cases that will be ben....
How many 76ers games did you watch last season?

You seem to be running thin on your argument that you've dived into stating the obvious. Of course, an offense always flows through one primary player, no matter the system. The point I'm trying to make here is the fact they have a system that's reliant upon ball/player movement means there's less chance Simmons is going to be the only shining light, because other players in the starting lineup are going to have near-equal opportunities to make a name for themselves due to how often they're going to be touching the ball.
 
Last edited:

lutha

Superstar
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
9,798
Reputation
765
Daps
13,569
Reppin
NULL
He'll be battling for touches in the sense that the other players on the team will have the ball in their hands to develop and fine tune their respective games, and the fact they're a young team who're still in the process of finding their identity - Brown will make sure each and every player gets their fair share of touches in different types of situations. Saric, Biid and Fultz aren't role players, they're all going to have important roles or at least they'll have the opportunity to see if they're deserving of having an important role.

It's not going to be a case where they shape the entire offense around Simmons, and everyone else is secondary, it'll be a long process of working out an infinite amount of things.

At this stage we don't know what role each player will play, what their workloads will be, we don't know which player will sink/swim, we don't know if one of Fultz, Saric or Biid takes a gigantic leap etc. There are many unknowns about this squad, and until we actually see the product on the floor for a generous period of time there's no sense in acting like Simmons is going to run away with the ROY.

I don't think you quite understand how this works.

:dwillhuh:

What the hell do you mean the game isn't a place to "develop" players? Players don't develop in "practice, workouts, training" - that's mostly prep work for the actual game. Players only develop when they get minutes, where they can get accustomed to the pace, competition, physicality, trends/patterns, environment etc of actual NBA play.

I can't believe one would even think to suggest that the "game" isn't a place to develop players. How the fukk do you think players get better in the first place?

We talking about practice for how players develop; practice, not the actual game, but practice? :aicmon:

How many 76ers games did you watch last season?

You seem to be running thin on your argument that you've dived into stating the obvious. Of course, an offense always flows through one primary player, no matter the system. The point I'm trying to make here is the fact they have a system that's reliant upon ball/player movement means there's less chance Simmons is going to be the only shining light, because other players in the starting lineup are going to have near-equal opportunities to make a name for themselves due to how often they're going to be touching the ball.

naw, i got a good understanding of it, i dont think you do though....the game isnt the place the player does the most developing..they do that in practice, training, the off season when working on their game, etc....the game is where they apply that development...and of course there will be some things they develop while playing in the game, but the major strides to their individual game comes outside of actual games....lol at you really acting like a player can just say fukk it, i'm just get better by playing in the games only.....that shyt dont work on any level, especially the pros...seriously, that's like telling a player that struggles with free throws not to work on it outside of the actual game, just wait till he gets fouled and shoots them in the game to get better at them....that shyt makes no sense and i cant believe one would actually think that lol....

which leads back to 'battling for touches' shyt you incorrect about...he's not gonna be battling for touches so other players can develop their game while in the games...yes, they will make adjustments during games, but going into games, the sixers will have a gameplan, which will be the show running through ben...which the coach himself has already said....

so, you say we dont know much about the team and gotta wait to see, but somehow you know that the shyt just wont run through ben?....lol aight man....and who said anything about him running away with roy?...no one, you're making that up to try to make a point...the question was who do we think will win it, that's it.....

i've seen a couple sixers games, how many did you watch?...and out of those, how many did you watch with ben playing?...cause i've actually seen what i'm talking about with him & the offense....you know, the same shyt the coach has said since they drafted him....hell, i even posted about it on here....anyway, why you keep trying to make it seem like people are saying he's gonna be the only shining light on the team? or that he's gonna be ball dominate like westbrook?...no one is saying that, i damn sure am not....what i'm saying is that even with the passing type offense, he is gonna be the primary focal point of said offense, which you just said every offense has, so it means he's not gonna be battling for touches.....and no, i'm not saying he has to avg 25 pts to be that focal point....but he will help make the game easier for his teammates, which helps his case for roy; he'll have a decent stat line, which will help his case for roy; and i think the team will win more games, which will help his case for roy....
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
91,372
Reputation
10,611
Daps
244,715
naw, i got a good understanding of it, i dont think you do though....the game isnt the place the player does the most developing..they do that in practice, training, the off season when working on their game, etc....the game is where they apply that development....
You're turning this into the semantics/etymological sport-meaning of "development", while taking what I said out of context. Practice, training, workouts are prep for the actual game, the development is actually in the game itself. Developing meaning to get accustomed to the pace, competition, physicality, trends/patterns, environment etc of actual NBA play. That was the proper context in which my original statement was made.

I'm talking about the development they need in games.
lol at you really acting like a player can just say fukk it, i'm just get better by playing in the games only.....that shyt dont work on any level, especially the pros....
You obviously have a reading comprehension problem because I already stated to you in a previous post - Players don't develop in "practice, workouts, training" - that's mostly prep work for the actual game. What the hell do you think that means? Why are you insinuating that I'm trying to say players don't get better from practicing/training?

Again, in this context when I'm referring to development I'm talking about the reps they need in games to develop. Learn to read.
seriously, that's like telling a player that struggles with free throws not to work on it outside of the actual game, just wait till he gets fouled and shoots them in the game to get better at them....that shyt makes no sense and i cant believe one would actually think that lol....
False equivalence.

I never argued a player doesn't need to work on their games/skillset outside of the actual game to get better. I'm talking about the development they need in the actual game.
which leads back to 'battling for touches' shyt you incorrect about...he's not gonna be battling for touches so other players can develop their game while in the games...yes, they will make adjustments during games, but going into games, the sixers will have a gameplan, which will be the show running through ben...which the coach himself has already said....
Except I'm not incorrect.

Again, you're taking what I'm saying out of context. When I say battling for touches I mean the touches are going to be distributed throughout the main players, which again you must apply the proper context of why I said it in the first place - which was based around folk stating Simmons is the clear-cut frontrunner for ROY. I'm simply giving a reason why that won't be, because of the fact there are other players on his team which will be getting a high amount of touches.

I don't mean "battling for touches" in the sense he's going to be fighting over the ball, or being phased out of the offense. He's the PG after all, he's going to be touching the ball more than anyone else. Don't take that phrase literally, it's just to illustrate other players on his team will need a decent amount of touches too, in order to develop.

It's not about adjustments during games, it's about their actual gameplan. They're not going to be running a Westbrook-MA type offense. Why do you keep bringing up this point about the offense running through Simmons when I've already stated he'll be the primary ball handler?
so, you say we dont know much about the team and gotta wait to see, but somehow you know that the shyt just wont run through ben?....lol aight man....and who said anything about him running away with roy?...no one, you're making that up to try to make a point...the question was who do we think will win it, that's it......
:merchant:

There were multiple posts that insinuated/stated he was the clear cut frontrunner prior to me making my original post, which is why I put forth an argument that it's not as simple as they're making it out to be.
i've seen a couple sixers games, how many did you watch?....
So basically you don't know what the fukk you're talking about. :heh:
how many did you watch with ben playing?...cause i've actually seen what i'm talking about with him & the offense....
Except you haven't because the offense/roles/players from the Summer League weren't the same as they were in the actual NBA games.
ianyway, why you keep trying to make it seem like people are saying he's gonna be the only shining light on the team? or that he's gonna be ball dominate like westbrook?...no one is saying that, i damn sure am not....what i'm saying is that even with the passing type offense, he is gonna be the primary focal point of said offense, which you just said every offense has, so it means he's not gonna be battling for touches.....and no, i'm not saying he has to avg 25 pts to be that focal point....but he will help make the game easier for his teammates, which helps his case for roy; he'll have a decent stat line, which will help his case for roy; and i think the team will win more games, which will help his case for roy....
More straw man arguments.

I never argued against this (never mind the fact this shyt is obvious), I've already mentioned he has "a realistic shot", I'm just proposing the question why folk are so convinced he's going to win it when they haven't weighed up the possibility/unknown of his role and the role of other players on his team. And what role every other lottery pick will have on their respective teams. It's fine to make a prediction on who will win, but he's most definitely not a "lock" to win it like it's been said in this thread.

You took what I said out of context and turned it into this meaningless argument about nothing.
 
Last edited:

lutha

Superstar
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
9,798
Reputation
765
Daps
13,569
Reppin
NULL
You're turning this into the semantics/etymological sport-meaning of "development", while taking what I said out of context. Practice, training, workouts are prep for the actual game, the development is actually in the game itself. Developing meaning to get accustomed to the pace, competition, physicality, trends/patterns, environment etc of actual NBA play. That was the proper context in which my original statement was made.

I'm talking about the development they need in games.

You obviously have a reading comprehension problem because I already stated to you in a previous post - Players don't develop in "practice, workouts, training" - that's mostly prep work for the actual game. What the hell do you think that means? Why are you insinuating that I'm trying to say players don't get better from practicing/training?

Again, in this context when I'm referring to development I'm talking about the reps they need in games to develop. Learn to read.

False equivalence.

I never argued a player doesn't need to work on their games/skillset outside of the actual game to get better. I'm talking about the development they need in the actual game.

Except I'm not incorrect.

Again, you're taking what I'm saying out of context. When I say battling for touches I mean the touches are going to be distributed throughout the main players, which again you must apply the proper context of why I said it in the first place - which was based around folk stating Simmons is the clear-cut frontrunner for ROY. I'm simply giving a reason why that won't be, because of the fact there are other players on his team which will be getting a high amount of touches.

I don't mean "battling for touches" in the sense he's going to be fighting over the ball, or being phased out of the offense. He's the PG after all, he's going to be touching the ball more than anyone else. Don't take that phrase literally, it's just to illustrate other players on his team will need a decent amount of touches too, in order to develop.

It's not about adjustments during games, it's about their actual gameplan. They're not going to be running a Westbrook-MA type offense. Why do you keep bringing up this point about the offense running through Simmons when I've already stated he'll be the primary ball handler?

:merchant:

There were multiple posts that insinuated/stated he was the clear cut frontrunner prior to me making my original post, which is why I put forth an argument that it's not as simple as they're making it out to be.

So basically you don't know what the fukk you're talking about. :heh:

Except you haven't because the offense/roles/players from the Summer League weren't the same as they were in the actual NBA games.

More straw man arguments.

I never argued against this (never mind the fact this shyt is obvious), I've already mentioned he has "a realistic shot", I'm just proposing the question why folk are so convinced he's going to win it when they haven't weighed up the possibility/unknown of his role and the role of other players on his team. And what role every other lottery pick will have on their respective teams. It's fine to make a prediction on who will win, but he's most definitely not a "lock" to win it like it's been said in this thread.

You took what I said out of context and turned it into this meaningless argument about nothing.

so even though i was replying to shyt you were directly saying, to you, i'm 'taking shyt out of context'....no my brotha, i wasnt...you just said some dumb shyt, and realized it hence the reason you running hard with the 'you took it out of context' and 'what i meant was' excuses lol.....also, lol at you negging me for pointing out you said some dumb shyt lol....you still cool with me brotha....

and no one's saying he's gonna run away with..the question was who you think will win....it's not asking by how much, will it be a close race, etc., just who you think will win.....it's whatever though, we'll see how it plays out when the season starts.....dont wanna waste more of your time as you said, and risk you negging me again lol....
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
91,372
Reputation
10,611
Daps
244,715
so even though i was replying to shyt you were directly saying, to you, i'm 'taking shyt out of context'....no my brotha, i wasnt...you just said some dumb shyt, and realized it hence the reason you running hard with the 'you took it out of context' and 'what i meant was' excuses lol.....also, lol at you negging me for pointing out you said some dumb shyt lol....
:gucci:

You took what I said out of context from the very beginning. Prior to me even posting in this thread, folk said he'd be a "lock" to win it - that's who I was directing my post towards. The fact that I said he has a realistic shot to win it should tell you that I was aware he'd be in the running. This is what I specifically said -

"Why are dudes so convinced Simmons will be ROY"

Meaning why are people so convinced he'll be ROY that they're willing to call him a lock for it. My post wasn't directed towards those who are predicting he'll win it (I've got him in my top-3), just the ones who're talking about no other player comes close.

And as I already said, "I don't mean "battling for touches" in the sense he's going to be fighting over the ball, or being phased out of the offense. He's the PG after all, he's going to be touching the ball more than anyone else. Don't take that phrase literally, it's just to illustrate other players on his team will need a decent amount of touches too, in order to develop."

What part about that is dumb shyt? If you were unsure of what I was specifically arguing about, perhaps you should've asked me what I meant instead of taking what I said out of context.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
91,372
Reputation
10,611
Daps
244,715
still cant believe the brotha negged me cause he said some dumb shyt lol.....
I negged you for wasting my time, because you don't necessarily disagree with what I said, you just took what I said out of context. This entire argument was just a waste of time, that could've be avoided if you read properly and/or cleared up any misunderstanding over my original post by just asking me.

Is it dumb shyt to question something which isn't a "lock"? :usure:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,260
Daps
279,782
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
Again, he's still going to be battling for touches. Just because he's going to be running the offense doesn't mean he's going to be one of the primary offensive options - all the other players will need their fair share of touches to develop, plus Fultz, Saric and Biid all can create their own shots. It's not going to be a case of everyone stands and waits until Simmons sets them up on every possession.

The 76ers were #1 in passes by a HUGE margin last season (yes, that's partly because they didn't have a legit PG to run the offense), but I don't see a drastic change in method next season - the ball is still going to move regardless of who's playing PG. Brown's a Spurs guy, he's incorporated the same principles from SA into the system in Philly, so although he'll give Simmons more rein to set players up there's still going to be the same offensive structure.


Their offense was actually great to watch when Embiid was healthy, all the different ways the ball could be worked to him or using him as a decoy.
 
Top