You're turning this into the semantics/etymological sport-meaning of "development", while taking what I said out of context. Practice, training, workouts are prep for the actual game, the development is actually in the game itself. Developing meaning t
o get accustomed to the pace, competition, physicality, trends/patterns, environment etc of actual NBA play. That was the proper context in which my original statement was made.
I'm talking about the development they need in games.
You obviously have a reading comprehension problem because I already stated to you in a previous post -
Players don't develop in "practice, workouts, training" - that's mostly prep work for the actual game. What the hell do you think that means? Why are you insinuating that I'm trying to say players don't get better from practicing/training?
Again, in this context when I'm referring to development I'm talking about the reps they need in games to develop. Learn to read.
False equivalence.
I never argued a player doesn't need to work on their games/skillset outside of the actual game to get better. I'm talking about the development they need in the actual game.
Except I'm not incorrect.
Again, you're taking what I'm saying out of context. When I say battling for touches I mean the touches are going to be distributed throughout the main players, which again you must apply the proper context of why I said it in the first place - which was based around folk stating Simmons is the clear-cut frontrunner for ROY. I'm simply giving a reason why that won't be, because of the fact there are other players on his team which will be getting a high amount of touches.
I don't mean "battling for touches" in the sense he's going to be fighting over the ball, or being phased out of the offense. He's the PG after all, he's going to be touching the ball more than anyone else. Don't take that phrase literally, it's just to illustrate other players on his team will need a decent amount of touches too, in order to develop.
It's not about adjustments during games, it's about their actual gameplan. They're not going to be running a Westbrook-MA type offense. Why do you keep bringing up this point about the offense running through Simmons when I've already stated he'll be the primary ball handler?
There were multiple posts that insinuated/stated he was the clear cut frontrunner prior to me making my original post, which is why I put forth an argument that it's not as simple as they're making it out to be.
So basically you don't know what the fukk you're talking about.
Except you haven't because the offense/roles/players from the Summer League weren't the same as they were in the actual NBA games.
More straw man arguments.
I never argued against this (never mind the fact this shyt is obvious), I've already mentioned he has "a realistic shot", I'm just proposing the question why folk are so convinced he's going to win it when they haven't weighed up the possibility/unknown of his role and the role of other players on his team. And what role every other lottery pick will have on their respective teams. It's fine to make a prediction on who will win, but he's most definitely not a "lock" to win it like it's been said in this thread.
You took what I said out of context and turned it into this meaningless argument about nothing.