Baby Mama Gets Diabetic Dad Arrested On Unpaid Child Support...He Dies In Jail Needing Insulin

havoc

Superstar
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
11,097
Reputation
1,130
Daps
26,763
Reppin
Live your own life
Is there a reason you caping for a ho bruh? shyts moist as fukk. You lil nikka kill me on here :mjlol:. I just be reading through threads where y'all be talking about females. shyt be comical. :cape:
I'm not a little nikka. I'm grown man speaking my mind. :smugfavre:
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
47,733
Reputation
3,539
Daps
117,117
Reppin
NULL
If any of them ever got state-sponsored assistance, he would have been put on CS by the courts automatically. The court actually puts out warrants when CS hasn't been paid for a certain amount of time. Even if the baby momma says she doesn't want/need CS and doesn't want him to go to jail, they'll lock his ass up anyway bc as far as the state sees it, he owes them money for the assistance they provided to his children.

Even his family's statement even said none of his babies mothers did anything to put him in jail.

And that's the setup... The article doesn't give a lot of details..... but if you can't support a baby without state sponsored assistance.... its gonna be an automatic fail for everyone most of the time.... especially for nikkas
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,566
Reputation
12,779
Daps
92,579
The tax dollars was why these hoes spread their legs in the first place. Babies as come ups.


I'm not sure why you guys continue to buy into and spread this Ronald Reagan welfare queen bullshyt.
Afdc is limited to a certain amount of years now and the average cash payment is under $600 a month for mother and child Food stamps about $200. If y'all think bytches are balling the fukk out on welfare go right Ahead and sign up.

Are there people who game the system and have plenty of income under the table from other sources? Sure. But like I said those people arent super paid off of welfare.

Before anybody even says it section 8 and govt subsidized low income housing have waiting lists years long all over the country.
Wic provides formula milk baby jar food for most of the month not the whole month.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2015
Messages
947
Reputation
50
Daps
2,384
Should of took care of his seed. Karma is real:manny:. He put these chain of events in motion himself.
 

IrateMastermind

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 6, 2013
Messages
5,478
Reputation
1,170
Daps
10,414
Maybe I misunderstood you, but I don't understand why there shouldn't be a consequence for not paying child support. Whether your underemployed or not there is no excuse.

@Sterling Archer gave me a good answer, but I've seen threads where people complain about getting money taken out their checks for child support too.

I think if we came up with a good alternative to the current system things could change.

Question. If both parent's are unemployed and homeless, should they both be thrown in jail? Neither is providing the child with accommodations it deserves.

There should be a punishment for child support but I honestly don't know what it is. Whatever it is both parents should be held to the same standards. I don't see how jail solves a problem for anyone except the state.

I think there should be a standard child support across the board. All single child situations are $200. Any additional child is $100. If you have more than one baby mom/ baby dad your total child support shouldn't total more than whatever the formula generates.

3 baby mom's means you pay $600. 3 baby dads means you receive no more than $600. 2 baby moms and 3 children = no more than $500. 2 baby dads and 3 children = no more than $500.

These babies should be get rich quick schemes. Both parents should have to pay for child care so both parents can work. If one parent isn't working there should be a punishment... still don't know what that would be (forced employment?.. scary proposition, i know). Maybe you can add to and edit the solution. Let's not get wrapped up in the $ amount, that can be debated later. Two heads are better than one on this.

*edit*

Solving this problem would be a lot easier if the kids were allowed to stay with the parent that's doing the best instead of the default being the woman always keeps the child. In the circumstance the man is doing better and he's a law abiding citizen who wants to be there for his child/children then he should be able to keep them. Same goes for a woman doing better than the man. She should get the child/children if that's what she wants.
 
Last edited:
Top