Baby Mama Gets Diabetic Dad Arrested On Unpaid Child Support...He Dies In Jail Needing Insulin

[nubianqueenbee]

Garnished wages not to exceed 50% of the earnings. Next question.

What about people(men and women) that work jobs 'under the table' for cash to keep their wages from being garnished?

 

[13473]

Child support is more important than a father figure according to feminists

Watch the kid grow up and killing the mamma in the process

there were 3 baby moms. they didn't report him. they received state aid to help support their kid, and the state decided to bring charges against him in the kids names.

he died over refusal of medicine not because he was put in jail. he could've been jailed over jaywalking & if the cops had refused his medicine then it'd be the same end result. the issue is how the cops handled him not why he was in jail

 

[Wild self]

there were 3 baby moms. they didn't report him. they received state aid to help support their kid, and the state decided to bring charges against him in the kid's names.

Yeah, it sucks all around

 

[MikelArteta]

Our black queens y'all

 

[bcrusaderw]

3 more kids that tax dollars gotta cover now

Tax dollars were already covering them.

 

[Sterling Archer]

from his family's fb page

We, the family of Michael Robinson would like to express our love and undivided support for the mothers of Michael's three children who have, and will continue to receive harassment, blame, and aggression from persons who publicly shame them as being responsible for the child support charges that landed Michael in jail.

These things are not as simple as people think. In many cases, it's not even the mother filing a complaint. Often it is mothers on public assistance who are forced to reveal the father's name in order to receive said public assistance, and then governmental agencies going after the fathers for child support they have not paid.

Michael loved his children. All three mothers are unified presently, with their respective attorneys, in order that we show up as a non-partitioned, single force in the pursuit of justice for the father of their three beautiful little girls.

We will not tolerate, nor participate in any attempts to slander their names, their honor, or motives by people wishing to debate issues around child support, parental responsibilities, etc. These 3 women are our family. They are suffering.

We will not stand by and say nothing when they are abused or berated by idiots in the peanut gallery who are so detached from this tragedy that they feel it okay to engage in their tea-sipping gossiping and condescending commentary.

We ask that all followers of the movement for justice in this case, please support us in this by refraining from all forms of discussion about the mothers involvement, and by nipping such commentary in the bud when it arises.

If any of you have ever gone through a death in the family and had to experience what it's like to try to keep your family unified when there are multiple difficult issues to manage, then you'll understand how damaging it is to a family structure to have such foolishness happening. Now imagine what that's like in THIS situation, where, on top of dealing with the fall out of his death, we are attempting to be a strong, unified, voice for not only our family, but for the thousands of other families whose loved ones have been killed by brutality or neglect from a law enforcement or "correctional" institution.

Technically it is the children who are the plaintiffs in the proceedings, and there is an incredible amount of pressure and fear for the mothers of Michael's children.

Please support us with a layer of protection around these mothers.

Not that its her fault but he was locked up for BACK childsupport, not active childsupport. And even if you are on government assistance, that requires the father to actively pay child support in order to receive certain benefits as they are claiming. She would STILL have to file a separate petition PERSONALLY to have him locked up for BACK childsupport. Which is why he was, not active. He was paying currently it seems.

Again, its not her fault by any means but dont bring up shyt like "In most cases...etc" if you are trying to distance yourself in defense if you know you are lying. They don't care about most cases, they are blaming her for THIS case. Unjustifiably so, but nonetheless. Its fukked up for everyone involved.

 

[ottorocket]

He was behind on back child support but maybe he was trying to keep up, does that warrant punishment?!!?!

Maybe he was underemployed, maybe he lost his job, we've seen it time and time again where vengeful women will call the cops on a nikka thinking they're gonna get him back that way, this isnt the first case i've seen with the same results!!!

I also feel that people should be given opportunities to make the money to pay child support it doesnt warrent punishment... There was a video i seen

1. Umm yeah
2. Shouldn't have 3 kids if you are underemployed.

Thanks for answering.

 

[Champ_KW]

This is in no way that woman's fault. If you don't want to be jailed for failure to pay child support then pay child support. The prison system that would deny any prisoner medical attention is solely at fault here, and hopefully they're sued into closure.

So it's cool for the courts to reduce your child down to an amount, but then get mad when the father does? If the state says your child is worth $150 and he give you $50.....did he fail? Or did the woman fail for running to "daddy" court system to tell them what to be "satisfied" with in regards to their child. I hate the whole notion of child support.

 

[bcrusaderw]

So it's cool for the courts to reduce your child down to an amount, but then get mad when the father does? If the state says your child is worth $150 and he give you $50.....did he fail? Or did the woman fail for running to "daddy" court system to tell them what to be "satisfied" with in regards to their child. I hate the whole notion of child support.

Then don't procreate outside of marriage, or get divorced.

 

[ORDER_66]

1. Umm yeah
2. Shouldn't have 3 kids if you are underemployed.

Thanks for answering.

 

[Woman of god]

Let the state kill a man because your too much of a trife bytch to close your legs, brehettes. bytches can't close there legs, but then play the victim. These hos ain't shyt.

U r truly an idiot. How is it the baby mother fault that the criminal justice system is neglectful and incompetent? A woman must have hurt u bad in life so now u over compensate by misplacing blame on other women. Dumb ass

 

[Reginald Noble]

I already knew this shyt was coming...

nikkas gotta reduce their liabilities at all costs. The system is designed to oppress AND KILL us.

This is why I have my perspective on child rearing. It didn't have to be diabetes, he could have gotten his head bashed into a cell wall by some mentally ill nikka locked in the cage with him. All kinds of ways you can die in jail.

 

[Reginald Noble]

there were 3 baby moms. they didn't report him. they received state aid to help support their kid, and the state decided to bring charges against him in the kids names.

he died over refusal of medicine not because he was put in jail. he could've been jailed over jaywalking & if the cops had refused his medicine then it'd be the same end result. the issue is how the cops handled him not why he was in jail

Yeah but child support is a top 3 reason why black men are in jail. So there ya go.

 

[Sterling Archer]

What about people(men and women) that work jobs 'under the table' for cash to keep their wages from being garnished?

Then you had a child with a criminal so you will have a difficult time. Your poor decisions dont always get retconned into a happy ending just because you had a child unfortunately.

 

[Champ_KW]

Then don't procreate outside of marriage, or get divorced.

Yeah cause the onus is strictly on the man. Women can have all the kids they can't afford, but the man can't? I agree, the decision to have kids need to be more thought out than the heat of the moment, but once the child is here, they're not a paycheck....regardless of the status of your relationship.