I can't cosign a game that can get beat in one sitting. This is not the NES 
Before the MGSGZ reviews start rolling in: How NOT to review a game
- Thread starter MeachTheMonster
- Start date
-
- Tags
- exposed hyprocrite woatin
Khalil's_Black_Excellence
The King of Fighters
It did? I could've sworn I saw it get mostly 8's and a few 9's.
BlvdBrawler
Superstar
I don't know about this. I just hope they don't give it a bunch of 10's like they did with MGS4 just based off the fact that's it's a AAA title.
MGS4 was sooooo fuuuuucking bad....
.
I remeber it loosing a lot of points due to graphics game was easily above a 9 IMO. And better than plenty of action games that scores higher.
Stinky Diver
attitude as bad as his odor
AP is full of glitches so it deserved the scores it got. Its one of those hate it or love it games and I hated it. The choices you got were cool though.
Hitman was great in the shooting department but the disguise system was trash, especially on higher levels...You could be across the map and you'd be spotted in a uniform. Everyone who trashed it because of that is absolutely right, it breaks the game.
Kane and Lynch I fukks with...If its the original one you're talking about. K&L 2 was terrible.
infamousred
All Star
i never buy games brand new anymore anyway. it's seriously no point considering how short they usually are cause they're more interested in online play than anything else. going off a single review site is foolish.
gamerankings.com
an average>>>>>some retard who thinks their opinion is the end all be all
gamerankings.com
an average>>>>>some retard who thinks their opinion is the end all be all
I liked the OG K&L AND part 2
NZA
LOL
i think it is good to take value into consideration.
i dont think value simply breaks down to length of campaign or additional side missions, but that is a part of it. if a game is really short, but excels in a way that is special and with few peers, then it can still be worth $60
taking the worst case scenario into consideration, a game that has one level that averages to around 1 hour of good yet conventional gameplay with no multiplayer and no side missions, and is not using cutting edge technology in any way should not be full priced, and if it is, the score should reflect the insulting value proposition.
games should also lose points for being padded with filler
i dont think value simply breaks down to length of campaign or additional side missions, but that is a part of it. if a game is really short, but excels in a way that is special and with few peers, then it can still be worth $60
taking the worst case scenario into consideration, a game that has one level that averages to around 1 hour of good yet conventional gameplay with no multiplayer and no side missions, and is not using cutting edge technology in any way should not be full priced, and if it is, the score should reflect the insulting value proposition.
games should also lose points for being padded with filler
They could have a least let you play the attack on mother base part. That shyt could have been real fun or let you play up too him escaping the hospital on horse back and finished it off with a good trailer...
but im asking too much for 30 bucks
but im asking too much for 30 bucks
GoddamnyamanProf
Countdown to Armageddon
I dont really disagree with this philosophy, though. When there's a thousand other shooters in the market, you cant help but grade on a sliding scale in comparison to more creative and unique gaming experiences.I see this happen a lot with short games.
Game is a five hour long Grade A shooter. "Despite strong shooter mechanics the game is on the short side and not worth full price."
Game is a three hour walk through a painting. "The game might be short but its philosophical depth makes it worth every penny you spend on it."
Animal House
Superstar
They blamed the graphics were outdated. I thought they were rough too but that game was a easy 8/10.
Animal House
Superstar
I dont give any reviewer credit anyway. I watch some videos and read what the gamers say, and only the ones who have the proper knowledge of said game/franchise/genre. Too many reviewers doctor up these AAA games and when i get my hands on them they tend to be lacking. Games like:
Bioshock Infinite
Dishonored
Call of Duty
Street Fighter
Just to name a few, dont flame me im not saying these games suck im just saying when the "professional" reviews came out they were praised for being fantastic art.
Bioshock Infinite
Dishonored
Call of Duty
Street Fighter
Just to name a few, dont flame me im not saying these games suck im just saying when the "professional" reviews came out they were praised for being fantastic art.
Uppin'
