You said who's the better NBA player, not who's the most talented. Draymond is the better NBA player. :sosmart:
I KNOW WHAT I SAID.I DIDNT SAY shyt ABOUT TALENT.
ITS A VERY SIMPLE QUESTION.


You said who's the better NBA player, not who's the most talented. Draymond is the better NBA player. :sosmart:
I KNOW WHAT I SAID.

NO ONE EVER SWORE SHAWN MARION WAS BETTER THAN MELO
AND DRAY HAS NEVER HAD MARION TYPE NUMBERS.




Is you slow or retarded so you saying if the cavs trade kyrie right now to the knicks we would be better off with melo stop it


Like literally NONE :russheh: whereas Dray on the other hand has superior defense, great vision along with great intangibles. shyt you can't teach. this isn't even a good question it's Dray by miles.Draymond...
Kyrie has no impact on the game if he isn't scoring...
Kyrie and Draymond are basically the same tiered players...great as additional pieces but if either one is your number 1 option on offense you are going to be a bottom 5 team in the nba...
Outside of like a Blazers team which is just a shytty ass shyt version of GSW or a Nets, how many teams would have Draymond as their lead facilitator? That takes away his biggest benefit offensively. He doesnt have some elite scoring game, usually during his "dominating" scoring performances, he's ripping dudes from open 3s (i.e game 7) not actually beating guys off the dribble and shyt.kyrie is a great scorer who saved lebron's legacy. but guys who do nothing but score are a dime a dozen in this league. you could replace kyrie with melo for example, and nothing would change. the cavs would still have won the ship last year. perhaps they would be even better because of melo's experience.
draymond, on the other hand, is irreplaceable. he's had to be the leader of that gs team because steph, klay, and now kd are laid back guys who lack that killer instinct. not to mention he's the best defensive player in the league and a decent offensive threat who is capable of going off for 30+. put anyone else on gs in draymond's place and they wouldn't be nearly as good.
not saying draymond is better... because he wouldn't have the kind of impact he has now on any other team. just that it doesn't make sense to compare players without considering the context in which they play.

Kyrie is top 3 at his position and top 10 in the NBA
Draymond isnt top 30
