Hillary emails Reveal NATO Killed Gaddafi to Stop Gold Backed Libyan Currency

[Jimi Swagger]

Ghanaian here. This nonsense about Nkrumah being corrupt and creating white elephants are spouted by people who cant still see the bigger picture. Nkrumah never hid his priorities. He made it clear that Ghana could only survive and prosper if we focus not just on primary production but also added value to them. He knew and has been proven right that African countries could only survive if we had strong alliances and cooperation among ourselves, that is why he spent a lot of money in several other African countries to secure their independence.
The forces of imperialism saw his direction and were using agents in Ghana to frustrate that. Ghana as a country was less than a decade old ffs, dude had to do what was necessary to realize the vision.
Knowing what we know now about how correct he was, how can you still hold on to such excuses used to destroy the one person who tried so hard to develop Ghana.

 

[newworldafro]

Water IS Wet.

Funny how this thread title was stated countless times during and after this .... intervention....and how it was deemed 'spiracy theory all over the place, with the pundits saying "he was a dictator, do you like dictators?" spin as the final word on the subject.














Africa for Africans brehs

 

[The Odum of Ala Igbo]

I just think it's cute that individuals who live in Western liberal democracies would prefer to live in Gadaffi's Libya where any criticism of him may mean the end of your existence. Then again, you're probably all very young and have never lived in a dictatorship. Hopefully that continues. Then again, may you live to see interesting times.

I'll just say this: For every Napoleon, there is a Robespierre and even Napoleon's actions led to the deaths of millions of his countrymen.

You have been warned.

 

[MajorVitaman]

(Users: 55, Guests: 33)

 

[UserNameless]

(Users: 55, Guests: 33)

Lit. #StayWoke

 

[David_TheMan]

it can't be a sole endeavor. .. it stems from the people. .. it stems from grass roots. .. so you're saying everybody just "do them" and let the shyt shake out?

It stems from a mindset, not control of the system.

What I'm saying is if you are looking at the political system to initiate change you are barking up the wrong tree, because it will never work.
I'm not advocating violent overthrow because its the same problem, you throw one group out of power, you will be hard pressed to ever see the group that mounted up the force to do so, simply relinquish that power. History has shown us with Mao, Red Army, and Taliban that when people take power after a long struggle they are usually consumed with hate and looking for revenge for the ones they lost and in turn you have a repeat of the same cycle starting to take place.

What I"m advocating is people have a change of mind, realize what we have now, the state, is the origins of a majority of the problems we have in simply living and abandon it. Its a system that thrives off legitimacy, not outright violence. So when you attack its true source, the public legitimacy bestowed upon it, you can cripple it.

I would hope a more anarchic solution would arise but I doubt it since most people are anarchist and buy into the concept of needing a leader or needing a king and other non-sense, instead treating others with respect and voluntarily associating and disassociating with those you want/ dont want to be around.

 

[BocaRear]

(Users: 55, Guests: 33)

This thread is being monitored

 

[UserNameless]

It stems from a mindset, not control of the system.

What I'm saying is if you are looking at the political system to initiate change you are barking up the wrong tree, because it will never work.
I'm not advocating violent overthrow because its the same problem, you throw one group out of power, you will be hard pressed to ever see the group that mounted up the force to do so, simply relinquish that power. History has shown us with Mao, Red Army, and Taliban that when people take power after a long struggle they are usually consumed with hate and looking for revenge for the ones they lost and in turn you have a repeat of the same cycle starting to take place.

What I"m advocating is people have a change of mind, realize what we have now, the state, is the origins of a majority of the problems we have in simply living and abandon it. Its a system that thrives off legitimacy, not outright violence. So when you attack its true source, the public legitimacy bestowed upon it, you can cripple it.

I would hope a more anarchic solution would arise but I doubt it since most people are anarchist and buy into the concept of needing a leader or needing a king and other non-sense, instead treating others with respect and voluntarily associating and disassociating with those you want/ dont want to be around.

Real words among a circuitous discussion right now. .. we need cooperative economics man. .. I'd wager that there's not any poster on here --who is not an agent-- who is looking to the government for answers.

 

[newworldafro]

He was going to get Africa and most importantly the world, off the USD/fiat as trade. Gold backed currency would put "developing" nations (Latin America, Asia, Africa) at an political and commercial advantage as the resources are found in those countries. Would have removed that first-move advantage that Western (White) pieces hold on the chess board had by controlling currency and trade.

Chess not Checkers.... rappers use to spit that hot lava like this post in verses....now its all garbeddy guck, at least mainstream.....one of the few who put himself out there was ....remember they called him a cooon cause he wasn't high marching goose stepping...

Race plays apart, but its much deeper than melanin.. . Thats why this interview that is coming out between A. Jones and L. Farrakhan this week....shows the charade and puppeteering is there so folks divide themselves versus find common ground. Both of them said the same thing as the thread title....during and after.....this intervention.

 

[David_TheMan]

Real words among a circuitous discussion right now. .. we need cooperative economics man. .. I'd wager that there's not any poster on here --who is not an agent-- who is looking to the government for answers.

What do you mean by cooperative economics?

 

[Kings County]

no it's not you are a fukking sheep

touched a nerve huh fakkit

 

[Jimi Swagger]

Good thing for opportunists with skill sets, education and clean records. Apply for jobs with Department of State and organizations like the UN. Need diverse faces as countries are getting tired of seeing American representatives in the likes of Bradley and Dan.

 

[UserNameless]

What do you mean by cooperative economics?

maybe it's simular to what you're saying. .. in a general sense. .. the like minded keep income within their own and leverage power.

 

[Dameon Farrow]

There is always an ulterior motive. Don't believe me? Think about this. Why turn a blind eye to these so called atrocities he committed? Why were we friends with him during the time that he was committing these horrible acts. Just out of the blue it's time to give a damn? Think for a minute.

 

[Trajan]

Btw fukk Libyans for the record. Racist pieces off shyt.

And Qaddafi was an unhinged megalomaniac not some humanitarian knight in shining armour.