To build a team around
In their primes, who do you take: Nash or Jkidd
- Thread starter BrothaZay
- Start date
obviously Kidd
nash was an allstar but his phoenix system propelled him to the HOF.
Kidd can play in any system and has throughout his career.
nash was an allstar but his phoenix system propelled him to the HOF.
Kidd can play in any system and has throughout his career.
J Kidd ( way better defender)
I dont know.
Was Kidd prime with the Nets? He was amazing for them but that was the WOAT eastern conference but most of those players didnt do shyt outside of playing with Kidd
Nash never shot the ball enough.
Was Kidd prime with the Nets? He was amazing for them but that was the WOAT eastern conference but most of those players didnt do shyt outside of playing with Kidd
Nash never shot the ball enough.
A good defender at PG isn't really necessary to a teams success.
blackestofpanthers
God forgives, you are forgiven.
Nash is the most overrated player in nba history.
No he isn't.
Give me Nash if we talmbout today's era. Nash in prime on offense > Kidd's offense in his prime.
Kidd may be a much better defender and better rebounder but these are not exactly the main criteria's for a point guard. The mistakes that suns did were having too many non defensive ass players on the court, stat could not play defense for shyt, only Marion and raja bell were playing defense out there. And D'Antoni had no clue on defense either.
Nash is basically Curry lite.
Kidd may be a much better defender and better rebounder but these are not exactly the main criteria's for a point guard. The mistakes that suns did were having too many non defensive ass players on the court, stat could not play defense for shyt, only Marion and raja bell were playing defense out there. And D'Antoni had no clue on defense either.
Nash is basically Curry lite.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
It's close but Kidd because Nash is such a defensive liability.
Kidd
I think Nash played at a higher level....but for only a very short time.
with that being said, I would take Kidd, as he was able to play at a higher level for a longer time.
Nash's 3-4 best years were just as good or better than Kidds 3-4 best years, but overall Kidd had the better career.
with that being said, I would take Kidd, as he was able to play at a higher level for a longer time.
Nash's 3-4 best years were just as good or better than Kidds 3-4 best years, but overall Kidd had the better career.
seemorecizzy
Superstar
kidd. not close
Canada Goose
Pooping on your head :umad:
I remember those early 2000 Nets teams 
so Kidd easily.
so Kidd easily.I'll take the guy that carried average and mediocre players to two straight Finals and was a major contributor to a championship and was a great defender for his whole career over Steve Nash, and it didn't take me half of a second to choose.