DEDE BROWN
Rookie
Thats why Im saying we need a scientist like me that already is aware that astrology is true lol...or else its not gonna happen so easily becuz they wont even know which angle to come from..... and yes i agree with leyet that it about probability in a way..but its not random that we cant follow it or else obviously it would be too hard to believe..it depends how u wanna look at ot...i can follow every full moon and it will work 90% of the time becuz its a bigger moment...if u just go day by day of course its harder to tell what's going to happen...a smart person could figure this out if they try....another example is...lets say its the energies say its a day for friends and group activities, my friend might call me up but I can decide to stay home...but if it was a full moon in friendship it would be more significant than just a phone call to hang out...i could give a million examples..the energies set the stage and likelihood of events etc who really knows exactly how it works but it obviously does have great influenceScientists don't go into things thinking they're true. They try to prove their ideas wrong. They look for flaws. This is how to approach scientific testing. The way you spoke about it sounds as if they go in with a parents ce about the idea.
The points mentioned above by LeyeT make out like there's too much possibility of outcomes being attributed to randomness. Which is why it gets no firm studies on its side.
Last edited:

