Maybe G*d/G0D Doesn't Do Things On Your Time, But His Time (Prove He Doesn't Exist)

[Freedman]

I majored in Computer/Electrical engineering and minored in Physics at Ga Tech

I'm close to a mathematics cert as well(skipped calculus I at GT because I took it in high school. Then I took 3 more levels of calc @Tech)

You should probably humble yourself when it comes to this topic /shrug

Ask me anything......

 

[xCivicx]

Intelligent design - RationalWiki

NGT is a paid for buffoon

And he's a freemason. I'm sure you have no idea why that relevant to the lies/propaganda that he constantly vomits(which he also can't back up)

But he was advertised to people such as yourself as a "cool black guy scientist" when he's really just a shill

 

[xCivicx]

Ask me anything......

There is no information that I desire from you...

 

[Freedman]

There is no information that I desire from you...

Then why quote me in the first place....

 

[SirReginald]

It's up to you to prove that he does

Good point. However, I dislike when people say he doesn't exist. How do you know? I take Science seriously, but no one knows. The better term would be Agnostic. Atheism's definition is believing that a G-d doesn't exist, but can't prove or prove that he doesn't.

 

[SirReginald]

pray to a nikka who doesnt apparently do anything, brehs.

Or go and and bust your azz yourself. G-d was originally meant to be a guide NOT answer giver.

 

[K.Dot]

And he's a freemason.

Oh, you're one of those, carry on

 

[xCivicx]

This is pseudo-intellectual babble btw

Intelligent design - RationalWiki

Evidence
ID-proponents such as Michael Behe promote theories such as "irreducible complexity" as evidence for their ideas. Irreducible complexity posits that there are certain organs and structures found in nature that have no convincing gradual evolutionary pathway, and are too complex to have come about in whole by chance. These ideas are hotly disputed (or dismissed as non-science) by scientists, but regardless of their truth value they do not constitute evidence for an intelligent designer. Proponents of intelligent design make an assumption unwarranted by the evidence in that their logic goes along the lines of "The origins and diversity of the species cannot be accounted for by evolution and natural selection alone, therefore there must have been a designer involved."

The very lack of positive scientific evidence suggesting that there is a designer involved in creating life raises the question of how the design hypothesis came about. Opponents of the design hypothesis would suggest that proponents are religiously motivated, and that their ideas are not about understanding how life came to exist but rather about promoting a particular religious world view - as espoused in the Wedge Document.

One problem with finding evidence for intelligent design is the inability to distinguish "naturally" evolved mechanisms from "designed" mechanisms. Nobody knows what the "design" of a supernatural creator looks like; how can we tell what was and was not designed?

Also, evolution is still a theory(put forth by the same freemason institution that NGT is a part of) that has never even come CLOSE to being proven

And to believe in the pseudo-intellectualism of evolution would mean that you also believe in the fundamental genetic inferiority of the Afrikan, since this is exactly what darwin believed and made a core part of his evolutionary theory

 

[xCivicx]

Oh, you're one of those, carry on

Educated?

Yeah

But I can teach you why ngt is trash without even speaking on who programmed him to feed you said trash

 

[K.Dot]

Good point. However, I dislike when people say he doesn't exist. How do you know? I take Science seriously, but no one knows. The better term would be Agnostic. Atheism's definition is believing that a G-d doesn't exist, but can't prove or prove that he doesn't.

Well most people don't like the evidence people provide because it's basura. My thoughts is IDK but just about any ideas and lore you can provide to me is bullshyt. I like when people. Just leave at "faith". Stop trying to stretch shyt and use pseudoscience

 

[xCivicx]

Then why quote me in the first place....

To dispel your argument of "I'm in STEM so I know more than you" before you tried to argue it

 

[K.Dot]

Educated?

Yeah

But I can teach you why ngt is trash without even speaking on who programmed him to feed you said trash

What if i was a prince Hall Freemason breh ?

 

[xCivicx]

What if i was a prince Hall Freemason breh ?

It wouldn't mean anything

Most lower level masons have no idea what people at the highest degrees are doing so I don't doubt that you wouldn't have any clue what's going on

 

[K.Dot]

It wouldn't mean anything

Most lower level masons have no idea what people at the highest degrees are doing so I don't doubt that you wouldn't have any clue what's going on

So you know more than me?

 

[Freedman]

To dispel your argument of "I'm in STEM so I know more than you" before you tried to argue it

That wasn't my argument. I specifically said "better to my liking". After all your math and science classes at Tech do you really believe the idea of some magic being creating the Universe sounds feasible??