Lord_Chief_Rocka
Superstar
You still have idiots in HL for Hilary and the establishment
Those are individuals. The article even states the RNC doesn't support these candidates, which is up for interpretation.
This thread is about the DNC rulemaking to prevent the wide spectrum of ideals from being Presidential candidates......don't flip the subject matter.
for the RNC I see while finding every opportunity to make threads attacking Democrats. You will never make thread criticizing Republicans.
FYI some of these candidate are supported by Trump and the RNC like Corey Stewart, and its telling that white supremacists feel comfortable running as Republicans.
How is forcing the presidential candidate to commit to being the leader of the democratic party in anyway forcing it to split?
Sanders own people aren't concerned about this.
If a candidate wants to lead the democratic party they should be a Democrat.Why would you need to force a candidate to be leader of the democratic party?
Vermont rules shield him from those issues, iirc. However, Sanders isn't the only person running for office. That short-sighted concern doesn't address future Progressive candidates.
A slick attempt to prevent a Tea-Party style opposition to the old guard is not gonna work out well. The 2016 election should have taught that lesson.
i think she's suffered enougha ship on the titanic
Actual democrats should be given democratic support, no?You still have idiots in HL for Hilary and the establishment
like I said. When Hillary had to loan/gift the DNC $10 million, I didn't even blame her for having stipulations in there.Wow Democrats want someone who is a Democrat to run for president on behalf of their party, how dare they.
Thats NOT why America doesn't have 3rd parties.America will never have a 3rd party that is viable for another 20 years in the best case. We have heard this third party noise every presidential election and they have never gotten 20 percent of the vote.
Say it with me:neither was your 2016 nominee
you say im such a bad guy for not showing up to vote for whatever corporate whore the dems trot out in the elections, so i cant help but make observations
Over the course of her career in politics, Hillary raised like $ 3 billion for democrats across the board
Hillary wasn't a Democrats. Hillary who voted together with Bernie 93% of the time isn't a liberal at all.
I will ask again why is someone like you who isn't a Democrats, liberal, progressive or leftist caring about DNC internal politics?
It's like me getting concerned about RNC alienating people on the right.
You don't get best.I'm independent actually as are nearly 42% of registered voters. Americans' Identification as Independents Back Up in 2017
I was registered Democrat, but when I saw BHO was mostly no different than Bush, I went ahead and Indy rocked.
Why do I care??????
I care because I want both major parties to pick candidates that aren't shills.......let my choices be Rand Paul and Tulsi Gabbard. Give me Jesse Ventura in the Green Party.
That's why I care, and want the best possible candidates, because I'm independent.
He's pretty consistent in worrying about only what affects him. So I wouldn't expect him to care about racism.Say it with me:
"JEFFERSON. BEAUREGARD. SESSIONS"
They actually didn't.you're all over the place and embarrassing yourself i stated the fact that the DNC predetermined that hillary would be the nominee and you're arguing with facts
At some point you have to stop thinking you're making a point with these zero dap worthy posts.