How many times can you set a record...low
Depends on when they get canceled
RAW 12/23/19 sets record non-holiday low in viewership
- Thread starter Saysumthinfunnymike
- Start date
Depends on when they get canceled
Maybe WWE can go the Jerry Springer route and give out a disclaimer during the intro of RAW. "For 30 years, the WWE have set the standard of Sports Entertainment. Now embrace us as THE WORST SHOW IN THE HISTORY OF TELEVISION
"Straight up keep it a buck since they obviously don't give a fukk anymore. Just keep dropping them turds so folks and armchair bookers can bytch and moan about for decades in the making
ALonelyDad
Veteran
Setting new records every week pal, dont see AEW doing it
Facts @Larry LegendVince’s reaction if it reaches TNA ratings and attendance numbers, which seems possible at the rate they’re going
& @Mantis Toboggan M.D. as much shyt I’ve given TNA at least they attempted to improve their ratings regardless if it worked or not. WWE is complacent and doesn’t give a fukk at all
They lost to Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity? They lost to a midnight airing of Sportscenter? Did I read that right or is it the coquito?
If so, wrestling is really washed. Its bigger than raw. This shyt has about as much cultural relevance in 2019 as Ragtime.
If so, wrestling is really washed. Its bigger than raw. This shyt has about as much cultural relevance in 2019 as Ragtime.
40,000 homes is supposed to represent 327 million people? Do you have any idea how dumb that sounds?
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
It's a good enough sample size to be likely accurate. In data you don't need a massive sample to get within 90% accuracy
Just seems easier to have a system where the cable box atleast monitors whos watching what for everyone. Maybe easier said than done
Nah... the day we start letting Comcast track analytics like Facebook has been, it's about to be a wild, wild world of targeted ads, political fearmongering aimed at those most susceptible to it and people willing to pay for it having your habits sold to them to do with as they please... like Facebook.
Knowing who is winning a wrestling 'war' damn sure ain't worth the wild, axis-tilted problems that could come out of allowing conglomerates the permission to record information on what you watch and release it, even 'anonymously'.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
it ain't that serious though. Like I said the numbers are going to be fairly accurate with that sample size. With how close AEW/NXT has been it could be off enough to not really know who won with 100% accuracy but with something like RAW they know where it finished.
If its going to happen, it’s going to happen with or without wrestling threads. The bigger problem is using ratings as a main barometer, when its a small sample size
NYChase718
Veteran
This imaginary war of aew vs wwe
When wwes ratings been going down the shythole for over a decade
AEW an unknown startup company for like 3 months pops up
wwe is champion wit ratings becuz they been around for 40 years but theyre actually always downward spiraling every year
When wwes ratings been going down the shythole for over a decade
AEW an unknown startup company for like 3 months pops up
wwe is champion wit ratings becuz they been around for 40 years but theyre actually always downward spiraling every year
Last edited:
JerseyBoy23
Veteran
I agree about the sample size but the networks and advertisers haven't raised a concern about it yet. In fact prior to 2016 it was only 20,000 households but Nielsen upped it to 40,000 on their own accord.