got me another raise at work cause of the ACA, thanks ObamaYou probably have the option of choosing between the two companies.holy fukk is this shyt confusing. the signup process was a huge pain in the ass, and now i'm getting brochures from 2 different companies. i'm not patient enough to read thru this garbage. i'm trying to find a new therapist, and get my mental health in order. but these mf's keep playing
holy fukk is this shyt confusing. the signup process was a huge pain in the ass, and now i'm getting brochures from 2 different companies. i'm not patient enough to read thru this garbage. i'm trying to find a new therapist, and get my mental health in order. but these mf's keep playing
What's the 411 on the fines? I haven't registered.this bullshyt.
well i tried to register a week late and the site for my state still isn't working. hmm...i guess i get fined? it's not like i have any money anyway.
MARCH 31, 2014: Under the ACA, all Americans must have health insurance, and this is the latest date you can acquire it if you wish to avoid paying a penalty on your 2014 income tax. Some individuals will be exempt from penalties, including, as of last week, people whose policies were canceled because their plans’ benefits did not meet new ACA standards of adequacy.
Another date that has drawn attention but, in my view, doesn’t matter as much:
JANUARY 1, 2014: This is not a deadline so much as an opportunity. It is the first day, when, if you signed up in time (now December 24 for the federal website, but a few states have later deadlines)—and paid your premium in time (at the administration’s urging, many insurers are allowing a grace period through January 10 for the federally run marketplaces and some states have also moved this date)—you could enjoy the subsidized coverage available under the ACA. But if you miss these so-called deadlines, you still have until March 31 to sign up for coverage to avoid a penalty.
Because it also allows for states to experiment with their own single payer plans if they so choose. Right now places like Vermont are finding out that it's more costly and harder to do than they expected. Also, it will provide valuable data. One of the proposals at the time was to extend medicaid and medicare to the the late 40s to 50s crowd (the group just outside of the range) for 10 years and study that data as means of determining costs. From there a single payer plan would be derived. But of course the lobbyists beat that back. Regardless, if all this information from exchanges can be analyzed, then you'll be in a better position to transition to a single payer plan and you would have a better idea of potential costs so you'll know how to ration things (because all healthcare systems partake in rationing).So it looks like the smart people here have been right so far. Obamacare didnt have to be good legislation to be successful. The number of people to be insured is very encouraging.
Even though the ACA doesnt affect me because I already have insurance, the issue I have with it is I dont understand how everyone buying insurance helps a transition to a single payer system. And I thought that was the end goal.
So it looks like the smart people here have been right so far. Obamacare didnt have to be good legislation to be successful. The number of people to be insured is very encouraging.
Even though the ACA doesnt affect me because I already have insurance, the issue I have with it is I dont understand how everyone buying insurance helps a transition to a single payer system. And I thought that was the end goal.