Ariza, Gortat, Nene and Beal were one of the best starting lineups in the East during the 2013/14 season.
So now Ariza, Gortat, Nene and Beal ain't shyt, but Kyrie at 19 was getting production out of the corpse of Jamison?
I. Their #s are not the same - never mind the fact that you have to look at the totality of the teams and not just surface #s
II. Wall was 23 and 24 playing with those lineups when he went to the playoffs. Kyrie was 19, 20 and 21 - Wall wasn't leading shyt at the same age(s).
III. The Cavs hardly ever had a consistent starting lineup during Kyrie's first three seasons, and when they did it was mostly with players in their early 20s like Thompson and Waiters. Wall was playing with consistent lineups (starters who regularly played 90% of games); players whom were in their primes - Ariza (28), Gortat (29-30), Nene (31-32).
It's not even remotely the same. Stop with revisionism.
That's because the team is built around LeBron's style, and they don't have an adequate wing player to replace him. Replace him with a player like Hayward and the Cavs would still be one of the best teams in the East. The Spurs have a better record WITHOUT Kawhi than they do with him this season because they have a more balanced squad, and not one that centers around Kawhi's style.