MicIsGod
They like what that mean
No you're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying JC has great performances. Not only was this not one of them, regardless of the standard I hold Jc at his first just was really an average round, he was just rappingYou never judge battles like clips, or goodz etc based on how good they came that battle. Yet you bring that standard now with jc. That's why it's hard to take your analysis serious because you switch your standards on how you judge based on how much you like a battle rapper or not. Now it's about jc not being his best that battle? How many battles have clips been mediocre in and you still handed him the win?
Jc has been better, but roc has been better as well, and roc is levels better than he was then, but who cares, if they both mediocre, then judge the mediocrity.

You could tell he didn't write his round to go at roc. Listening to it back it sounds clearly recycled. I felt roc had a good round and he had the only haymaker in that round. shyt like that weighs heavy for me. You don't really like roc but for normal battle fans that do know his 2nd round was one of those classic Tay roc 10-8 2nd rounds. One of those rounds that have hollow aiming to be the "2nd round King" now. Battle was over after that. You're trying to point out some bias but you're in here literally trying to give JC excuses for spitting recycled material. He wrote a round for Cyber Sammy and used it on a URL stage against one of url's most consistent battlers....and you're defending that
That's crazy to me. That battle alone is why Jc was off url for years.



