humminbird
Veteran
Why did I laugh at thisI just ended it with my PAWG
Why did I laugh at thisI just ended it with my PAWG
So they get to slander Kobe and walk right?
With the way karma works we’ll see the tables turned.
Can’t Vanessa sue?
Forget about Kobe for a moment.
This c*nt is trying to make the death of some 13 year old little girls about her and her victimhood.
sue for what, reposting shyt that actually happened 20 years ago? keep in mind it doesnt seem as tho she called him a rapist, she is a journalist, she knows better. she literally posted "rape case....accuser" etc. he actually did have a rape case, and an accuser. no slander in saying that
slander means you lied on someone. now if she said rape conviction, or rape victim.... that might be different
His accuser was not proven to be factual, and anyone who followed that case knows that.
Therefore, she as at the very least guilty of Libel with a side of Slander because she published something
she knew might be untrue.
And (like it seems I always have to say when something like this happens), as a person who makes their
livelihood from their ability to choose their words correctly, she should have a heavier responsibility than most.
sue for what, reposting shyt that actually happened 20 years ago? keep in mind it doesnt seem as tho she called him a rapist, she is a journalist, she knows better. she literally posted "rape case....accuser" etc. he actually did have a rape case, and an accuser. no slander in saying that
slander means you lied on someone. now if she said rape conviction, or rape victim.... that might be different
nah. She posting shyt that was already proven to be false. That is not part of his legacy and she should be fired.
She won the battle, but she will definitely lose the war. No way you tweet that about your boss and not get fired. I think the heat might be too hot to fire her now, but give it six months and she will be gone.
thats not how the legalities go.
did she says the accuser was proven to be factual? or did she say there was an accuser and a case. two different things
thats like trying to sue someone for saying "trump got impeached". it doesn't matter if whatever hes accused of is true or not. he did get impeached. thats fact
like r kelly trying to sue someone for saying he had a child porn case and accuser. he was acquitted but that doesnt change the fact he went through a case and someone accused him.
she chose her words quite well. still a weirdo for bringing it up tho
Doubt that dudes even cares, if I had a billion I wouldn't.Wouldn’t doubt the call came from Bezos himself
There’s a reason why he brought the Post and it ain’t for his portfolio. He didn’t do it for money.Doubt that dudes even cares, if I had a billion I wouldn't.
Her words are leading to the conclusion to the non-savvy that he was guilty.
She can absolutely get sued for that.