19 Year Old Girl From Chicago Found Dead In Hotel Freezer After Partying With Friends

[FaTaL]

Of course she’s not going to get $50M - all lawsuit negotiations start off much higher than where they’ll end up.

She’ll get something though. And frankly she should. The fuk is the point of having cameras etc if no one is monitoring them? Most likely greedy ass management have security doing 20 other jobs bc they don’t want to pay wages/ hire employees. Fukk em.

Here’s a secret, nobody monitors security cameras in real time unless it’s high security

Security cameras are only there to look at if something happens

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

The cameras monitor themselves, there was recordings after all.

She wont get a dime. He daughter wasn't supposed to be there, she was basically trespassing.

You’re trying to argue legal theory without understanding the legal definition of trespassing and/or negligence.

As a property owner it’s possible to be held liable for someone getting injured on your own land, even if they didn’t have permission to be there, and walked by a massive NO TRESPASSING sign. Sounds fukkd up but it’s true. It’s all about whether the plaintiff can convincingly argue that the defendant should have reasonably assumed anticipated the danger.

They’re going to argue that the hotel has a duty of care to ensure that employees only areas are secured. They will argue that they have a duty to ensure the safety of its residents - and that includes someone stumbling around the halls drunk/high. I didn’t follow the story when it happened so unsure if and when the friends notified security/hotel. If they did it early enough that she may have been found before she died then the hotel with settle.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Here’s a secret, nobody monitors security cameras in real time unless it’s high security

Security cameras are only there to look at if something happens

Completely irrelevant

 

[FaTaL]

If I was the mom I would sue the manufacturer of the freezer instead of the hotel. I’ve been in these walk in freezers, the floors are slick and are difficult to open from the inside if you have no upper body strength. I can see how a drunk person gets stuck in there with no footing

 

[True Blue Moon]

If they win I’m gonna go to Waffle House, sneak in the back and stab the fukk out of myself with one of the knives and then sue because the kitchen should have had thermal infrared fingerprinting technology

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

Here’s a secret, nobody monitors security cameras in real time unless it’s high security

Security cameras are only there to look at if something happens

I believe you. The difference between reality (what you just described) and the responsibility (what will be litigated in court) is where the battle will take place.

To the dudes in here trying to be funny - not even gonna respond as it’s obvious you’re not equippe, mentally/intellectually, to have this discussion

Very low IQ.

 

[saturn7]

Who's Responsible?

 

[FaTaL]

I believe you. The difference between reality (what you just described) and the responsibility (what will be litigated in court) is where the battle will take place.

To the dudes in here trying to be funny - not even gonna respond as it’s obvious you’re not equippe, mentally/intellectually, to have this discussion

Very low IQ.

Here’s another, are hotels required to have surveillance equipment? Is it a state law?

 

[Real N Quotes]

Sue somebody cause your drunk azz daughter decided to sleep in a freezer

Bichoff wow

• FaTaL
• Oct 15, 2017

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

Here’s another, are hotels required to have surveillance equipment? Is it a state law?

I can’t imagine that’s required by law in any state.

But that’s not the point. Businesses install cameras to protect themselves (from employee/customer theft, frivolous lawsuits and to document their compliance with other laws) and their customers.

The fundamental question will be whether the jury believes the hotel provided adequate security/monitoring of their premises. If an area is supposed to be only for employees is there adequate security to ensure other people can’t access it? If/when they were alerted by her friends that she was missing was there an adequate response? Is there some sort of protocol that was or wasn’t followed? Did an employee run into her at any point? Has something like this happened before?

All this, not to mention 1000 other things will be hashed out.

 

[True Blue Moon]

I believe you. The difference between reality (what you just described) and the responsibility (what will be litigated in court) is where the battle will take place.

To the dudes in here trying to be funny - not even gonna respond as it’s obvious you’re not equippe, mentally/intellectually, to have this discussion

Very low IQ.

Let me get my jokes off without resorting to insults breh

 

[knickscity]

You’re trying to argue legal theory without understanding the legal definition of trespassing and/or negligence.

As a property owner it’s possible to be held liable for someone getting injured on your own land, even if they didn’t have permission to be there, and walked by a massive NO TRESPASSING sign. Sounds fukkd up but it’s true. It’s all about whether the plaintiff can convincingly argue that the defendant should have reasonably assumed anticipated the danger.

They’re going to argue that the hotel has a duty of care to ensure that employees only areas are secured. They will argue that they have a duty to ensure the safety of its residents - and that includes someone stumbling around the halls drunk/high. I didn’t follow the story when it happened so unsure if and when the friends notified security/hotel. If they did it early enough that she may have been found before she died then the hotel with settle.

I did follow the story in it's entirety, and I understand fully. I suggest you read up before commenting.

I doubt she gets anything, what's he moms defense? Her drunk underage child that her mom never knew was there is the hotels responsibility? Hell, they offered to pay for her funeral, and the momma said nah.

The hotel did try to make amends. They should be suing the mom for lost business.

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

I did security for one of those Rosemont hotels back in 2016.

We normally go home after 3am because people are normally asleep by then. Even if this would have happened during my shift, We weren't responsible of someone somehow getting in the kitchen and freeze themself to death in a freezer

That's some top shelf security protocols, because everyone knows that nothing bad ever happens after 3am. I'm pretty sure it's a law or something. Your post should be Exhibit A lol.

 

[GnauzBookOfRhymes]

Let me get my jokes off without resorting to insults breh

ruined it for you huh...

 

[True Blue Moon]

ruined it for you huh...

Nah I thought it was adorable