2016-2017 NBA Free Agency/Offseason Thread

[CrimsonTider]

What have the Clippers done to improve? Doc is an awful GM.

You know Doc's GM strategy is to sign players coach for or against when he was in Boston

 

[Flex Grossman]

I guess, Denver just seems random to me. They're probably the only team that can offer him the max right now. Milwaukee would be a better team than Denver right now imo. But hey it's all about the muhfukkin money

If he goes to Denver they'll probably go .500. But he'd be a great mentor to mudiay, Murray and Harris.
They're also talking about the fact that they could trade him to Cle on Dec 15.

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

When imbeciles like you write continual bullshyt on the regular, it's quite easy to decipher & pinpoint your consistent fallacies.

Less speculating and more so working on the notion that winning back-to-back titles with the same group would influence what the Warriors FO would've done -

There's no "facts" to work off here, because all we have to go off is Barnes shytting the bed in the Finals while the Warriors choked away a 3-1 lead - his play and the Warriors losing affected GS's offseason priorities. If he had a FMVP-performance with GS sweeping the Cavs (winning back-to-back titles with this core group), the Warriors would've lent towards retaining Barnes rather than looking elsewhere.

You can stop quoting me now.

You'd be a fool to think that things would've played out as they did if Barnes won FMVP and the Warriors swept Cleveland.

 

[Mr. Brown]

How many 7.5 millions you got? Let that man get his money.

He fukked up when he opted out of that contract the summer that LeBron left because he ended up losing money. He thought his boy was gonna come back so he opted out to help things and he ended up getting screwed over. He's trying to make up for it now.

I get it from both sides really. He had times where could've had more so he's trying to get it back now. But at the same time the Heat want to make sure they have flexibility in 2018 when almost all the cap will be devoted to about 5 guys so they're trying to avoid giving him that 3rd year.

I tiny ultimately they'll trade McRoberts and give him the 2 year $50M offer that Denver is offering

 

[iamduval]

If there gonna offer him 30 mil per he should take it. I think he loves the spotlight more than he loves the money tho

 

[Dwight Howard]

There's no "facts" to work off here, because all we have to go off is Barnes shytting the bed in the Finals while the Warriors choked away a 3-1 lead - his play and the Warriors losing affected GS's offseason priorities. If he had a FMVP-performance with GS sweeping the Cavs (winning back-to-back titles with this core group), the Warriors would've lent towards retaining Barnes rather than looking elsewhere.

You can stop quoting me now.

Warriors taking Durant over Barnes in any imaginable scenario. be serious

 

[O.G.B]

Less speculating and more so working on the notion that winning back-to-back titles with the same group would influence what the Warriors FO would've done -

You're too stupid to realize that you've basically admitted you have no real clue or factual basis what is it your actually writing.


no·tion
ˈnōSH(ə)n/
noun

1. a conception of or belief about something

2. an opinion, view, or belief:
"That's his notion, not mine."

3. conception or idea:
"his notion of democracy."

4. a fanciful or foolish idea; whim:

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

Warriors taking Durant over Barnes in any imaginable scenario. be serious

Another person that doesn't get it.

Tell me if Barnes won FMVP (and rightfully deserved it by being the main factor in them winning) and the Warriors swept the Cavs - would this have an influence on what the Warriors would do and what Durant would do? Do you think the Warriors would've been more inclined to keep Barnes and this group together? Do you think that Durant would've been less inclined to join GS if they did win back-to-back titles?

You're too stupid to realize that you've basically admitted you have no real clue or factual basis what is it your actually writing.

Because I'm talking about what potentially could've happened if the Warriors did win the Finals + Barnes being the MAIN factor in them winning. I'm saying things would've played out differently. You're saying it wouldn't have changed anything. They're both "notions". Use your brain for once.

 

[King P]

 

[jwinfield]

 

[King P]

 

[O.G.B]

Because I'm talking about what potentially could've happened if the Warriors did win the Finals + Barnes being the MAIN factor in them winning. I'm saying things would've played out differently. You're saying it wouldn't have changed anything. They're both "notions". Use your brain for once.

The only "notions" on the matter are your remarks, as my comments are based on pure fact (not speculation or hearsay) with evidence to back them up to which you can't counter with any substantial facts of your own.

Big difference clown!

,

 

[Wiirdo]

The vet minimum

 

[Dwight Howard]

Another person that doesn't get it.

Tell me if Barnes won FMVP (and rightfully deserved it by being the main factor in them winning) and the Warriors swept the Cavs - would this have an influence on what the Warriors would do and what Durant would do? Do you think the Warriors would've been more inclined to keep Barnes and this group together? Do you think that Durant would've been less inclined to join GS if they did win back-to-back titles?



Because I'm talking about what potentially could've happened if the Warriors did win the Finals + Barnes being the MAIN factor in them winning. I'm saying things would've played out differently. You're saying it wouldn't have changed anything. They're both "notions". Use your brain for once.

no. Iggy won mvp, and they would've replaced him with Durant easily, no brainer

 

[Gil Scott-Heroin]

The only "notions" on the matter are your remarks, as my comments are based on pure fact (not speculation or hearsay) with evidence to back them up to which you can't counter with any substantial facts of your own.

Big difference clown!

,

Except they're not.

- I said things would've played out differently (Barnes winning FMVP/being the main factor in them winning + Warriors sweeping Cavs)
- You contested that by saying it wouldn't have influenced either the Warriors FO nor Durant's decisions or actions

If you don't think outcomes as significant as this, don't at the very least influence a team's or player's actions than there's no need for us to continue this discussion.