King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,984
Reputation
4,628
Daps
45,616
I have no idea what you’re talking about. I’m talking about the excuses made to give people like Obama a pass for the cowardly, awful elite-serving decisions they make (ex. continuing the bank bailout but giving no relief to mortgage owners who saw their wealth deteriorate) along the lines of he’s just trying to work in a system he can’t control.

The post I was responding to was saying people blame people too much instead of systems. I disagree. I believe the opposite.
I didn't read dora's post as seeking to exonerate Barack Obama and his accomplices from all charges, I read it as asking us to have a deeper, more systemic understanding of the forces that create conditions for Obama (or Trump, for that matter) to do what they did. She literally said "individuals aren't the enemy, the system we enable to exploit folks and keep wealth concentrated is." Getting rid of the individual (Obama, in this case) won't solve the issue unless it's coupled with a systemic analysis. I very much disagree that we should be thinking less about structural systems of oppression and more on canceling individual actors. The latter should be a result of the former, not the other way around.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,048
Daps
132,829
I didn't read dora's post as seeking to exonerate Barack Obama and his accomplices from all charges, I read it as asking us to have a deeper, more systemic understanding of the forces that create conditions for Obama (or Trump, for that matter) to do what they did. She literally said "individuals aren't the enemy, the system we enable to exploit folks and keep wealth concentrated is." Getting rid of the individual (Obama, in this case) won't solve the issue unless it's coupled with a systemic analysis. I very much disagree that we should be thinking less about structural systems of oppression and more on canceling individual actors. The latter should be a result of the former, not the other way around.
Of course there should be systemic analysis. I was more speaking on holding elected officials accountable for what they do. I may have have went too far astray in my response to @dora_da_destroyer but I think there is an insidiousness to the notion that people in positions of power don't actually rationally choose to make the decisions to implement trade deals that cause massive layoffs, or deregulate banks to allow the whole financial system to collapse. I used Obama cause he's the perfect exhibit A. I used to buy into the notion that Obama really was a progressive and couldn't be one cause he was hamstrung by the system for a long time because I really wanted to believe it, when really he was a true believer in neoliberalism, found bipartisan consensus-making the highest virtue, and probably slept with a copy of Thomas Friedman's The World Is Flat on his nightstand.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,984
Reputation
4,628
Daps
45,616
Of course there should be systemic analysis. I was more speaking on holding elected officials accountable for what they do. I may have have went too far astray in my response to @dora_da_destroyer but I think there is an insidiousness to the notion that people in positions of power don't actually rationally choose to make the decisions to implement trade deals that cause massive layoffs, or deregulate banks to allow the whole financial system to collapse. I used Obama cause he's the perfect exhibit A. I used to buy into the notion that Obama really was a progressive and couldn't be one cause he was hamstrung by the system for a long time because I really wanted to believe it, when really he was a true believer in neoliberalism, found bipartisan consensus-making the highest virtue, and probably slept with a copy of Thomas Friedman's The World Is Flat on his nightstand.
I hear you, I've asked myself that exact question of Obama's true motivations. And while I believe there's enough evidence to show he doesn't actually share the same ideology as the progressive movement, I don't think it's possible to know how a more committed progressive ideologue would have been able to bring about actual materially different outcomes. At least when it comes to legislation. And because it's impossible to know, I think the energies spent on parsing one's true motivations may be better spent on altering the system's risk-reward factors to incentivize actors to move in the progressive direction. Punishing individuals may very well be a part of those risk-reward factors, but I think it's important to keep our eyes on the structure and loose sight because we're chasing individuals down rabbit holes. Like, I was and am strongly in favor of punishing the criminals of the Bush and Trump (and Obama) administrations, but I'm in favor of it because deterrence should become a feature of the system.
 
Top