not a fan of amplifying someone's endorsement with that history of vileness. People seeing Bernie's Twitter dont need to be swayed by joe Rogan anyway..
They scared. Warren And Biden And booty wanted to do Rogan’s show and he declinedBernie will attract these type of white voters that we're going to need to defeat Trump
I remember some old white dude who voted for Obama, then Trump in 2016 telling me he would have voted for Bernie. Bernie can get those white Obama/Trump voters.
going on his show is fine
But Banks were allowed to fail, just not all of them.
You do this a lot. You move the goalpost to a discussion to get a “gotcha” even though no one said this. Yesterday you made it seem like someone said their lives were worse now than entering the workforce in 2006-7, when that was never the discussion.But Banks were allowed to fail, just not all of them.
And ultimately that's to the benefit of society as a whole unless you were banking on complete anarchy.
Imagine the loss of the bond market.
That said there was also HASP for homeowners and the foreclosure protection Act.
Millions of Americans lost there homes, but millions of Americans were also saw foreclosures.
Is your proposal that the government purchase homes that were upside down then expect people who had lost their homes because they couldn't afford to pay their mortgage to pay their mortgage?
None of that would have been possible if the banks all failed.
policy towards those that got fukked over didn’t help.
The discussion is naturally moving where you all took it and im just responding with the facts.You do this a lot. You move the goalpost to a discussion to get a “gotcha” even though no one said this. Yesterday you made it seem like someone said their lives were worse now than entering the workforce in 2006-7, when that was never the discussion.
I am not a policy person but letting those banks thrive and cake while people lost their homes and wealth isn’t right. Maybe instead of letting the banks get money and flex, maybe regulate that money and force them to fix the injustices they caused? I’m sure someone else probably has a better policy paper on this, but Obama’s
going on his show is fine
Retweeting the endorsement
Bernie isnt online and obviously has no idea about Rogan's hostory, but someone in the campaign should have stepped in
Are you suggesting the free thinking crowd isn't free thinking.
The discussion is naturally moving where you all took it and im just responding with the facts.
The initial point that the majority of Americans lives were better when Obama left office than when it took it still remains. As a result his popularity remains high among most Americans.
I then said a lot of the critique seems to be based on framing Obama as something he never was policywise to call his presidency a failure.
You then went on to say that people lost homes and the banks were bailed out.
I'm merely pointing out that banks were bailed out, some failed, people were bailed out, some lost their homes, but the idea that the government was going to save all homeowners during a recession without first saving the banks and the bond market just isn't possible.
Where was the money going to come from?
That's not moving the goalposts.
Most of this comes from loans that are a part of the bond market which maintains our credit rating.
Rhule probably downed a bottle of $300 wine immediately following this segment.
