A.R.$

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
8,551
Reputation
680
Daps
22,169
:what: I have a MBA as well why the hell are you paying 150k out of pocket towards a MBA :dahell: . If you didn't have a proper scholarship you should have gotten yourself a career to pay for that degree that's what I did. Im sorry It sounds like you took some financial missteps in dealing with those loans. your wives degrees definitely worth it but you should have gotten into a company that would have paid a large % of your MBA instead all of OOP.
I never said I paid 150k for an MBA:dead:
Our debt is not split 50/50. She went to pharmacy school so obviously her debt will be more than mine. Besides that student loan debt is not just grad school. It is grad school combined with undergrad.
 
Last edited:

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,502
Reputation
3,215
Daps
153,040
I never said I paid 150k for an MBA:dead:
Our debt is not split 50/50. She went to pharmacy school so obviously her debt will be more than mine. Besides that student loans debt is not just grad school. It is grad school combined with undergrad.
Oh alrigh my bad lol, take back almost everything I said my bad still don't think all debt should be cleared a large percentage for sure.
 

A.R.$

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
8,551
Reputation
680
Daps
22,169
bingo....and this is an even bigger problem for black families where 1) school is our most viable path to better careers/higher earnings 2) we don't have the familial resources to pay our way through school 3) we don't have aunts, parents, grandparents who are going to diesand leave us hundreds of thousands as an inheritance - if we're lucky we'll inherit the a home with a mortgage on it still :heh: 4) i know for many older millennials and gen x, they were first gen college graduates so the desperation to go trumped cost, people took out loans for whatever it cost to get that degree
Exactly. Also a lot of for profit colleges took advantage of young Black people that were trying to change their lives. They took out a shyt load of loans only to get a worthless degree from a non accredited school. They were really scamming in the 00s.
 

goatmane

Veteran
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
17,005
Reputation
2,821
Daps
116,175



Not saying thia is true, but is this why the establishment hates him so much? They are all the same age [late 60s- 80]

Imagine being 30, big time after graduating from an Ivy League and hearing about this guy in the news

Then that bum from Vermont from 50 years later managed to be President
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,917
Reputation
17,315
Daps
276,068
Reppin
Oakland
Well I don't have a water down MBA if that's was what you were trying to say :gucci:, if you're trying to get into a top 20/25 school you shouldn't have any issues with gathering a scholarship to pay for it. Also if you're from a top 25 school you should EASILY be able to find a career to pay for it. I don't agree with your view on this.
the point of freeing up people from the loan debt isn't about if you can afford to pay it (tho there are tons of grads who cant) it's about correcting the burden incurred for exponentially skyrocketing educational costs and freeing a generation of people (across incomes) to direct funds into other parts of life and the economy (the way previous generations did), and for sanders/warren - the inevitable rise in their tax burden.

you don't have to agree with it, but i get why it's on the table, especially if they move to make public colleges tuition free. you can't have boomers having paid $10k for a degree, gen x - z with $50-150k in student debt, then gen whatever onward attending school for free. the loan forgiveness/reduction smooths over the costs incurred by those 2.5/3 generations
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,502
Reputation
3,215
Daps
153,040
the point of freeing up people from the loan debt isn't about if you can afford to pay it (tho there are tons of grads who cant) it's about correcting the burden incurred for exponentially skyrocketing educational costs and freeing a generation of people (across incomes) to direct funds into other parts of life and the economy (the way previous generations did), and for sanders/warren - the inevitable rise in their tax burden.

you don't have to agree with it, but i get why it's on the table, especially if they move to make public colleges tuition free. you can't have boomers having paid $10k for a degree, gen x - z with $50-150k in student debt, then gen whatever onward attending school for free. the loan forgiveness/reduction smooths over the costs incurred by those 2.5/3 generations
So what are we doing for the people who paid off their student loans :patrice:.
 

the cac mamba

Banned
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
111,880
Reputation
14,195
Daps
317,040
Reppin
NULL
Nothing needs to be done.
and why is that fair to people who paid off their loans, or overpaid them to get rid of them? or chose to go to a state school because it was cheaper? or the people who dont go to college, but would have gone if they knew it would have been *poof* completely free?

we're just going with "it isnt", right? i mean that's cool, im just wondering what the actual argument is when it comes time to put this shyt in motion
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,917
Reputation
17,315
Daps
276,068
Reppin
Oakland
:huhldup: good luck in the fall with that.
i mean, that issue has been tucked so far away...health care is the live or die by issue this fall :manny:
and why is that fair to people who paid off their loans, or overpaid them to get rid of them? or chose to go to a state school because it was cheaper?

we're just going with "it isnt", right? i mean that's cool, im just wondering what the actual argument is when it comes time to put this shyt in motion
well the great thing about putting that one into motion is bernie/liz can do it

 
Top