2020 Democratic Primary Thread: Focus on House & Senate races
- Thread starter mc_brew
- Start date
Oh so you can advocate for people financially worse off? Or is it only Bloomy can or only Bernie can't?
And no answer on who you plan to vote for if Bernie is the nominee? Welcome to Trumpset I guess.
1. I don’t advocate for people being worse off financially
2. I’m just pointing out Bernie’s hypocrisy when he says someone’s wealth is immoral
3. If Bernie is the nominee I’m voting Bernie why is this even a question?
Th3G3ntleman
Superstar
To keep it a buck I had no idea you were talking about the topic of Bernie being a millionaire. The timing of your post and my post is coincidental. Whether you choose to believe that or not is up to you but I had no idea you were talking about it at the same time. Not that it would of changed my post in anyway.
My initial post was based off @Arbitrage! post about his frugalness and that duncan dude talking about his homes the other day in embarrassing fashion along with all the other "context" about his millions on SM. I generally speaking skim long post unless they are directed towards me and your post tend to be longer than most.
I don't see how they pick her unless Bernie demands it as a compromise and they can't get shyt together without getting him on board. She's too progressive for the actual establishment, she doesn't look very electable right now, and she's not even all that connected.With Warren running as democratic candidate
When they pick her at the brokered convention after she loses her home state to Bernie and puts up Pete numbers in SC
If it really goes to a contested convention, I feel like they would either try to push Biden (if the DNC has control) or Bloomberg (if he just pays enough people off). But it's really hard for me seeing them not going with Bernie in the end. They really have to realize that if they reject Bernie they're fukked beyond belief as a party. And if they pick Bernie and he loses against Trump, they can blame him instead of reevaluating themselves. That's probably what they'll be rooting for.
Eternal Tecate
Superstar
Yes, yes, let's employ no tactics instead
the cac mamba
Banned
"the government should provide healthcare to every citizen" works for meI agree. That's a poor way to word it.
However, for the vast majority of citizens, if they get diagnosed with cancer it's either:
Go into crippling debtDie
We should change that. It shouldn't be too hard to come up with a third option that's "better".
but i don't feel that it's my "human right" that someone else goes to med school so they can take care of me
what kind of disgusting, communist bullshyt is that?and i dont say this to split hairs, but dudes in here supposedly want bernie to win in 2020. his messaging needs work
Uno Venova
Your honor, I was merely capping.
Being the only candidate leading in one of the biggest swing states is a big deal
bloomberg IS trump with a better suit on, and a slicker move maker.you hate to see it
and I’m not a “sick fukker” I’m just drawing a contrast of what Bloomberg can point too being a chief executive against trump vs what trump is going to call Bernie a communist if he gets the nom
What if trump wasnt so out in the open with his shady moves who would he be? Mike bloomberg. thats who. Trump is russia, bloomberg is china.
Trump is racist trying to keep muslims out and send erry brown and blacks out the country. Bloom locks up brown and blacks just cause. Trump attempts to purchase influence during his run, he was buying black people to come to his rallies and to sit behind him at town halls. Bloom admitted to paying to get black folks to come out and support him via thru their campaigns.
its the same dude. So why on earth me as a black man would want bloomberg in office over trump? i wouldnt. that would be stupid. and if i was white and cared about my fellow darker skinned citizens i surely wouldnt want bloom to be my president.
The guy shouldnt even be on that stage. the shady dnc changed the rules to let him in. this means he has to be ALLOWED to circumvent ish in order to get in and do damage with his money. he can only lead with his money cause he doesnt have great policies to lead with. and he's a horrible debator.
only a selfish fan of his would vote for him. Bloomberg aint bringing out a single new voter. so how is he going to convince the purple states he has their back when talking to that working class? he wont. and he will lose just like hil but by a worse margin.
Yeah, if Bernie loses they can finally tell progressives to sit down and let them do things. I can see why they are so against Bernie seizing power because it's the end of the consultant class and favors but they can't steal it from him without destroying the party.
saying a mayor got more done than a senator sitting around a bunch of people who wont do anything to help actual working class people means nothing. you cant compare those two. thats apples to cherries.
But since you went there. lets go at least apples to oranges seeing that new york is has a very large population of a lot of different people while also having a lot of money to boot. its just different. but lets see what old man bernie was up to in Vermont. lets see if the man who you hear today is still about that life or was he ever about that life he acts like he's about today?
and just for fun. this exact same thing is happening to working class people right now in 2020. the exact same thing.
Last edited:
In TWO of the biggest swing states. Not just Wisconsin, Pennsylvania too now (though I believe that poll was probably too close and it will swing back to a safer margin).
