This is just categorically false. Why do you think people keep talking about Harvard touting her as a POC hire? The entire scandal, dating back to her Senate run against Scott Brown, has been based on her getting special career benefits because she lied about being Native American. It's an affirmative action scandal. Pow Wow Chow cookbook isn't at the heart of this smear, Harvard and the State Bar of Texas are. Falsely believing you have a claim to Native American identity because your parents told you exaggerated stories about your ancestry is just embarrassing. Purposefully lying about your identity to scam your way into benefits reserved for POC is a scandal with some teeth. Unfortunately for you, the latter has been debunked.
If you want to turn this issue into "Elizabeth Warren naively believed some family lore her parents told her that turned out to be false" then be my guest. That's a nothingburger scandal.
But keep pushing it, you'll take her down one day
What do you mean "this is just categorically false"?
You are attempting to conveniently limit the scope of her Native American controversy to being solely about whether or not she got career benefits over claiming it, that's why you keep harping on that Boston Globe article and ignoring overall issue. It's almost like Trump saying "no collusion!" over and over and ignoring all over proof of malfeasance.
-FACT: She falsely claimed being Native American into her 60's.
-FACT: She gave an elaborate story about her parents eloping over her mom's fictional Delaware and Cherokee heritage as late as 2012 that has been debunked with receipts by actual American Indian tribal leaders.
-FACT: She listed herself as Native American while she was a professor, allowing universities to tout her as a minority professor, helping to fill university diversity statistics and potentially keeping out actual minorities from her faculty position.
-FACT: Time and time again when asked to provide any documentary evidence of her Cherokee heritage, she has refused or failed. When asked by the Boston Herald, she cited 2 things: a geneologist who suggested with no evidence that she might be 1/32 Cherokee, and a book of recipes she submitted to a Cherokee cookbook called Pow Wow Chow that seemed to have been plagiarized from the NYT in 1984. When asked later she cited her high cheekbones and once told a reporter she has family pictures but they're for her when asked if she had pictures to prove her family's heritage.
-FACT: She finally took a DNA test last year and it showed she was 1/1000 something American Indian and cited this as proof. She later apologized after being ridiculed.
I don't know how anyone can look at any of that and come away not feeling she has been dishonest and fake about who she is, and it will give most voters a negative reaction.
Do I think any of this should or will disqualify her for President, or will it stop me from voting for her? No.
But it is a real issue that deserves scrutiny not a smear, and it will come up. Scoffing at it like it's a non-factor is dumb. It's going to keep coming up and your girl better do a better job of addressing it than she has done so far.