King Kreole
natural blondie like goku
...because when looking at healthcare costs compared to other countries, healthcare professional's salaries stand out as much higher?That's fine and that is to be expected. Hence the question, why are you choosing Healthcare professionals salaries?
This was the kind of messaging jiu-jitsu Obama used when trying to pass the public option and the doctors pulled up on him and made him back down.I get where you're coming from I do. And this largely applies to general practitioners. IMHO it's an easier sell to use more NP and require less in person visits to handle routine care as a better solution.
We can disagree here though as it isn't too important to the overall position imo.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/22/AR2010102203394.html
"To avoid the wrath of hospitals and doctors, proponents of the bill rarely emphasized this cost-control argument. Nonetheless, when conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats weakened the public option in committee, they cited opposition from providers. And when the bill's supporters floated a close alternative to the public option -- letting people over 55 buy into Medicare -- the reaction from Sen. Olympia Snowe, the moderate Maine Republican, said it all: "I am talking to a lot of my providers . . . and I know they are mighty unhappy." Snowe exposed where the lobbying strength lay: No senator ever spoke of listening to "my insurers."
"The public hates the insurance industry and trusts doctors and hospitals," said Richard Kirsch, head of the liberal coalition Health Care for America Now. "But what killed the public option was the hospitals, not the insurance industry."
Politicians wanted to avoid a confrontation over providers' prices. So a different policy argument took hold: The real reason everything cost so much was the overuse of health care, not the actual prices of treatment."
The doctors and hospitals will stand in the way of any effort to universalize the healthcare system because they realize they'll ultimately have to share some of their wealth in order for the system to be functional. They're not dumb. Might as well go for the full monty.
I don't think we disagree here at all, it is untenable to reduce doctors' salaries without reducing the financial burden of their education. There must be a commensurate reduction in med school fees and debt. But after that's taken care of, their quality of life metrics will need to fall in line with their counterparts in other countries. Most doctors aren't living hand to mouth, drowning in school debt. It's a very good life, compared to most professions. I'm not even saying they can't be highly paid, I'm saying they can't be so highly paid. All I'm saying is it should be more in line with some high-education professions. If you think a doctor having the same quality of life as a professor, federal lawyer/judge, NASA scientist or chief engineer in exchange for universal healthcare is a deeply unfair bargain, then yes, we do disagree.This is where we will disagree completely.
1. Doctors high pay is largely a result of the high cost of education in this country and the high cost of starting a practice.
200 thousand dollars tables, 300k degrees, etc. If you want to cut cost you need to cut the cost of entry. If you don't many of these people will move into other Stem degrees that require less education and pay more.
2. Doctors are almost always the highest paid in societies you use as justification for why our doctors should make less. This is something you have to reconcile.