DonKnock

KPJ Gonna Save Us
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
27,156
Reputation
7,860
Daps
88,738
Reppin
Houston


Then you would see that this is the exact policy Bernie is advocating, have the government negotiate prices on behalf of Medicare and allow foreign imports of drugs that are made here and then sold in Canada which would reduce the price due to actual competition.

The true story of America’s sky-high prescription drug prices


All politicians are the same — who take corporate money. Because they are then beholden to their corporate donors. That is why Sanders takes only small individual donations and no PAC or corporate donors.


Name another presidential candidate that has done that before you start making false equivalences again.
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,599
2018 doesn't happen without progressive voters.
You're the one who lives in a false reality. Please stop repeating these asinine talking points.

the harsh reality is that the progressive vote nationally is the least needed vote in an electoral college system. The progressive vote is the most highly concentrated vote within one specific area, urban metropolitans districts.

If you identify members of the progressive caucus and look at the votes in the districts they represent. Moderates win most of those districts with or without progressives.
 

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,526
Reputation
1,599
Daps
32,343
Reppin
Houston TX
the harsh reality is that the progressive vote nationally is the least needed vote in an electoral college system. The progressive vote is the most highly concentrated vote within one specific area, urban metropolitans districts.

If you identify members of the progressive caucus and look at the votes in the districts they represent. Moderates win most of those districts with or without progressives.

There was no electoral college involved in 2018. Completely ignored my post.

If you want to reduce elections down to presidential only, when evaluating the value of progressive voters then that's extremely shortsighted. Also hilarious, considering what happened in 2016.

I live in a district right now that has a moderate House Rep who flipped a red seat in 2018. She isn't doing that without progressive voters, despite your fantasy.
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,599
Then you would see that this is the exact policy Bernie is advocating, have the government negotiate prices on behalf of Medicare and allow foreign imports of drugs that are made here and then sold in Canada which would reduce the price due to actual competition.

The true story of America’s sky-high prescription drug prices


All politicians are the same — who take corporate money. Because they are then beholden to their corporate donors. That is why Sanders takes only small individual donations and no PAC or corporate donors.


Name another presidential candidate that has done that before you start making false equivalences again.


I mean I along with other black ppl with boots on the ground are anti small donations validating a progressive presidential candidate bc it invalidates black candidates coming from black districts day 1. They don’t have the population base to compete with those numbers. That’s why you don’t see black pundits who even support Bernie/Warren push this narrative bc to be blunt, it’s a product institutionalized racism.****edit and that’s why why you don’t see Bernie/Warren ever post the percentages of which races gave the most money to their campaigns via small donations

in saying that yes, having a government arm negotiate prices will help the USA. However that doesn’t negate my point that other socialized countries costs will rise.

they have a better negation position due to the USA’s current state. That inherent advantage is negated once the biggest buyer has that card to play to. It’s Econ 101. You’re agreeing with my point
 
Last edited:

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,599
There was no electoral college involved in 2018. Completely ignored my post.

If you want to reduce elections down to presidential only, when evaluating the value of progressive voters then that's extremely shortsighted. Also hilarious, considering what happened in 2016.

I live in a district right now that has a moderate House Rep who flipped a red seat in 2018. She isn't doing that without progressive voters, despite your fantasy.


She’s not. shes a moderate that needed progressive votes.

A progressive nominee can’t do that tho, bc there’s not enough of you to do that.

just using your example of house reps that flipped red seats blue. 40/41 of those flips were by moderates.

if white progressive ideals appealed to ppl so broadly, there’s be a track record of them being able to do so.

If you can only do it 3% of the time. That’s not a winning plan? :yeshrug: There’s nothing there, just hopes and dreams.
 

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,526
Reputation
1,599
Daps
32,343
Reppin
Houston TX
She’s not. shes a moderate that needed progressive votes.

Which is the exact problem with your argument.
You admit that my current rep would not have won without the progressive vote, then also celebrate the idea of progressives leaving. Without the progressive vote in 2018, it's unlikely that we even have impeachment right now.

A progressive nominee can't do it on their own under this two party system that's true. Neither can moderates. If progressive voters get so fed up that they defect from the party, that is not good news for you. You said it yourself, moderates need the progressive vote.
 

blotter

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,035
Reputation
870
Daps
11,290
Moderate set are the kids who were too afraid to leave "base" playing tag growing up

They point to 2018 but never the 2010, '12, '14, or '16 elections. 2018 was a rebuke of trump and Republicans. The reason we took Ls pretty much all last decade until 2018 is because Democrats didnt sincerely fight for working folks after being elected in 2008

Yall just want to get the seat, but dont realize a Biden administration is an auto loss to Hawley in 2024 who wont be incompetent when implementing his brand of fascism. Working/poor folks are only going to come out if you're fighting on their behalf.. warren/bernie/Steyer are the only ones even slightly believable about having that fight
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,599
Moderate set are the kids who were too afraid to leave "base" playing tag growing up

They point to 2018 but never the 2010, '12, '14, or '16 elections. 2018 was a rebuke of trump and Republicans. The reason we took Ls pretty much all last decade until 2018 is because Democrats didnt sincerely fight for working folks after being elected in 2008

Yall just want to get the seat, but dont realize a Biden administration is an auto loss to Hawley in 2024 who wont be incompetent when implementing his brand of fascism. Working/poor folks are only going to come out if you're fighting on their behalf.. warren/bernie/Steyer are the only ones even slightly believable about having that fight

I mean Bidens protecting way more jobs than Bernie or Liz. It’s one of the reasons why he’s winning Pennsylvania.

Being very pro climate change and fighting for the middle class workers is starting to be an oxymoron.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,932
Reputation
5,397
Daps
72,385
The caucus system in Iowa might cause Bernie to lose just looking at those numbers. If I’m him, you have to root for Klobuchar at this point.
 
Top