dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,422
Reputation
17,140
Daps
273,847
Reppin
Oakland
i disagree with this, if people want to spend their money to run, it is what it is. steyer wouldn't have had an audience had he not. he's not going to get the nomination, but if he's serious about politics, he may have created a bigger grassroots lane for him in a state election or senate/house race and he has a pretty damn good platform worth hearing

there's also the discrepancy in how black politicians don't garner the same individual donor participation levels for a multitude of reasons, but it's not democracy to keep us out because we don't grassroots fundraise as successfully.

at the end of the day, someone like bloomberg is polling all on name recognition, not true intent. the best ideas don't always win, but i will say candidates who put in work often do, and he's put in zero work. also, his ties to local politicians may be what deliver more than his ads
source.gif


It would be best for democracy if only individuals could contribute to campaigns directly or indirectly, up to a certain $ limit. No rich people having outsized influence by spending tens of millions of personal funds on ads. No corporations contributing unlimited cash via Super PACs. They gotta raise that ad money from the people. Let the best ideas win, not the deepest pockets.

But America is completely controlled by corporations and the rich, so that'll probably never happen.
 
Last edited:

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,048
Daps
132,808
Somebody got to be chaotic evil. She is the candidate of those who seek to take down the "establishment" and this is more of just how her image is among a lot of democrats. So she gets the chaotic label from the first part and the evil label for the second part. Its a joke. Don't take it too personally.
She fukks with Steve Bannon, was raised in a cult and is a Modi/Assad sympathizer. Evil it is.

giphy.gif
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,422
Reputation
17,140
Daps
273,847
Reppin
Oakland
They don't need to travel to all 50 states. Also, each party can change which starts come first and in which order. The Democratic Party should move up some of the bigger states to be earlier.

Candidates should travel to a certain regions not states per se. That's very doable in 2-3 months.
you need to be in the states and connect to the people there, so many people vote just because they met you at an event and you left an impression. quite honestly, all the candidates have sounded better in their town halls, they need those types of events with the people in their home area. you also can't then go into the general not being a known entity in certain states.
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
110,723
Reputation
14,270
Daps
315,290
Reppin
NULL
we should draft forward thinking laws, yes. why wait until a billionaire buys the election to pass legislation? we can (and should) be proactive when we recognize vulnerabilities in the system
so who are you to say how much an election should/will cost :heh: i mean i HEAR what you're saying, but it doesnt pan out in reality

i mean with all the problems we have with corruption in washington, billionaires funding their own campaigns is literally like the last one
 

King Static X

The Realest King (የተከበረው ንጉሥ)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
22,023
Reputation
10,741
Daps
102,255
Reppin
Kings County
you need to be in the states and connect to the people there, so many people vote just because they met you at an event and you left an impression. quite honestly, all the candidates have sounded better in their town halls, they need those types of events with the people in their home area. you also can't then go into the general not being a known entity in certain states.
Well, then America is too big.

So the 2 year campaigning makes sense :manny:
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
200,148
Reputation
27,050
Daps
642,382
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Biden is looking horrible out here but he has to stick through South Carolina because what we're seeing more and more out of Iowa and NH is that it is not representative of even half of the Democratic landscape.

I always laugh when these pundits make it seem like Pete for example is on the rise. Even if he is on the rise with moderate whites, what does that really mean? He's likely to get stomped out in places that aren't as moderate and white.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,927
Reputation
5,397
Daps
72,375
i disagree with this, if people want to spend their money to run, it is what it is. steyer wouldn't have had an audience had he not. he's not going to get the nomination, but if he's serious about politics, he may have created a bigger grassroots lane for him in a state election or senate/house race and he has a pretty damn good platform worth hearing

there's also the discrepancy in how black politicians don't garner the same individual donor participation levels for a multitude of reasons, but it's not democracy to keep us out because we don't grassroots fundraise as successfully.

at the end of the day, someone like bloomberg is polling all on name recognition, not true intent. the best ideas don't always win, but i will say candidates who put in work often do, and he's put in zero work. also, his ties to local politicians may be what deliver more than his ads
The solution is publicly funded elections. Someone like Sanders is viable entirely because the internet made grassroots funding easy. But if you asked him if all these elections were to just be publicly funded then he would agree.
 

Nobu

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Mar 2, 2017
Messages
5,773
Reputation
8,520
Daps
62,037
so who are you to say how much an election should/will cost :heh: i mean i HEAR what you're saying, but it doesnt pan out in reality

i mean with all the problems we have with corruption in washington, billionaires funding their own campaigns is literally like the last one

Who is the FEC to say how much money normal people can contribute to a candidate?

The government limits normal people to only give up to $5000 to a candidate, while a billionaire can give hundreds of millions via their own SuperPAC ("as long as they don't directly coordinate with the candidate" :mjlol:)

Doesn't sound fair to me :francis:
 

Listen

Tell me moar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,689
Reputation
1,487
Daps
22,905
Reppin
A few Floors Down from the Daily Grind
Just did my civic duty.

It picked up in my ward real quick as everyone got out of work. In the end I tossed my vote to Amy over Steyer, though I had that ballot for like 3 minutes staring at it before I filled it out.

Also, for those not in the know, In NH you walk in as an independent. Once they find your name and you can pick from either ballot. Once you submit it, you can walk over to a book, tell them which ticket you took and sign your name next to it and you go back to undeclared for the next go round.

Kind of cool, not sure how other states do it.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,422
Reputation
17,140
Daps
273,847
Reppin
Oakland
The solution is publicly funded elections. Someone like Sanders is viable entirely because the internet made grassroots funding easy. But if you asked him if all these elections were to just be publicly funded then he would agree.
i actually dont agree with publicly funded elections either, not if it's coming from a tax on individuals. i think there are structural changes that could make campaigning more affordable but i wouldn't want to be paying into some election pot with no control over who my money supports, nor do i see these millionaire candidates (moreso at the national level) as good places to be spending public money on, especially with how dysfunctional washington is
 
Last edited:

King Static X

The Realest King (የተከበረው ንጉሥ)
Supporter
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
22,023
Reputation
10,741
Daps
102,255
Reppin
Kings County
Just did my civic duty.

It picked up in my ward real quick as everyone got out of work. In the end I tossed my vote to Amy over Steyer, though I had that ballot for like 3 minutes staring at it before I filled it out.

Also, for those not in the know, In NH you walk in as an independent. Once they find your name and you can pick from either ballot. Once you submit it, you can walk over to a book, tell them which ticket you took and sign your name next to it and you go back to undeclared for the next go round.

Kind of cool, not sure how other states do it.
In NY, it's different. I went to the DMV to get my ID and when you're at the clerk to get your ID, you can use this electronic screen to register as a Democrat, Republican , independent, etc. I tapped Democratic and then that was it. This was in November 2017.
 
Top