King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,991
Reputation
4,628
Daps
45,641
Wait what part of this disproved what I said?

I only spoke on the who gets covered because Liz at the end of the day is too bendable to deliver on universal healthcare. Thats why the public chose the more authentic candidate to deliver it.
You claimed her proposal was Medicare-for-Some and it's not, her proposal is Medicare4All with a two-step transition plan as opposed to Bernie's one step plan. You claimed her plan would be watered down by Republican bullying, while it's actually Bernie's plan that would have to be negotiated with Republicans. Liz's plan was designed to avoid that and just require negotiation within the Democratic coalition. Her winning vote is Joe Manchin, Bernie's winning vote is Mitch McConnell. Whether you believe Liz is "too bendable" to deliver on universal healthcare is a different discussion, but seeing as universal healthcare will not be deliverable by anyone in the next 4 years, I don't see the value in having that discussion. I'm interested in expanding free, comprehensive health care coverage to as many people as possible, and I believe Warren's plan is the best route to achieve that goal.

I like the intent and thought put into drafting them but ultimately I feel better with a movement of the American people as a driver for it than a bunch of "if, then" ass plans.

nikkas dont even want to discuss plans on merit, just now the goalposts are moved to what republicans will fight as if they dont fight any and everything.

Liz's pragmatism will be needed in the senate.
I'm also a fan of a movement of the American people, which is why I'm a fan of Warren's position that you need a movement pushing from the outside and a leader doing all they can from the inside in order to enact true progressive change. Plans are the weapons wielded by the insider.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,068
Daps
641,708
Reppin
The Deep State
You claimed her proposal was Medicare-for-Some and it's not, her proposal is Medicare4All with a two-step transition plan as opposed to Bernie's one step plan. You claimed her plan would be watered down by Republican bullying, while it's actually Bernie's plan that would have to be negotiated with Republicans. Liz's plan was designed to avoid that and just require negotiation within the Democratic coalition. Her winning vote is Joe Manchin, Bernie's winning vote is Mitch McConnell. Whether you believe Liz is "too bendable" to deliver on universal healthcare is a different discussion, but seeing as universal healthcare will not be deliverable by anyone in the next 4 years, I don't see the value in having that discussion. I'm interested in expanding free, comprehensive health care coverage to as many people as possible, and I believe Warren's plan is the best route to achieve that goal.


I'm also a fan of a movement of the American people, which is why I'm a fan of Warren's position that you need a movement pushing from the outside and a leader doing all they can from the inside in order to enact true progressive change. Plans are the weapons wielded by the insider.
I love this :wow:
 

hayesc0

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,507
Reputation
8,353
Daps
118,861
I was playing around with tax calculators between the USA and the UK to see what the difference is.

If you make $50,000 in the US, that’s roughly $38,000 after tax (may vary by state). I get that people contribute to 401ks and health plans but imma keep it simple.

The equivalent of $50,000 in the U.K. is 38,618 pounds. That’s roughly 29,796 pounds after UK taxes are taken out which is equivalates back to $38,577 in US dollars. The UK workers makes roughly the same post tax earnings in terms of purchasing power as the US worker.

If you jump the salary to $150,000, the US worker has roughly $100,700 after tax (may vary by state). The U.K. worker ($115,854 is the British Pound equivalent of $150,000) has 72,557 pounds after tax which is roughly equivalent to $93,900 in US dollars on a post tax basis. It’s $7,000 more than the US person had to pay but in the scheme of things it’s not a big deal.

Why is it that the British pay a comparable tax rate to us but they have various social services that we don’t in America :jbhmm:
Because the tax code only benefits the rich and these politicians are slaves to the insurance industry? Alex
 

Pull Up the Roots

Talking? During horse head bookends?
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
26,268
Reputation
13,667
Daps
113,098
Reppin
Detroit
Bernie bout to put a lot of these cats out of work. That’s why they mad.


?

Zerlina Maxwell is an American political analyst, commentator, speaker, and writer. She writes and speaks about rape culture, sexual assault, gender inequity, sexual consent, racism, and similar topics.[1][2] She is herself a survivor of sexual assault and describes herself as a survivor activist.[1][3]
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,991
Reputation
4,628
Daps
45,641
?

Zerlina Maxwell is an American political analyst, commentator, speaker, and writer. She writes and speaks about rape culture, sexual assault, gender inequity, sexual consent, racism, and similar topics.[1][2] She is herself a survivor of sexual assault and describes herself as a survivor activist.[1][3]
Yeah I hit the :weirdo: at that post. What, is Bernie going to bring an end to women fighting back against rape culture? Is his movement ending feminism?
 
Top