This dude is a conspiratorial fukk
I mean, pretty much everyone in the debate thread was saying the same thing about the crowd.
Seemed pretty obvious there were plants.This dude is a conspiratorial fukk
Seemed pretty obvious there were plants.Its not his place to mention that. Thats for surrogates.I mean, pretty much everyone in the debate thread was saying the same thing about the crowd.Seemed pretty obvious there were plants.
Um no, if you (and I hope this never happens) get cancer, I’m starting a go fund me and flying out to sf to see you. We’ll fight for you to survive.If I get cancer and can’t afford to treat it, tough shyt. We got too many people on earth as it is![]()
I’ve never called myself a progressive soThese Warren supporting "progressives" really revealing themselves under the pressure![]()

Its gonna happen if the wealth gap isn't redistributed
And why wont you like seeing some a$$hole CEO getting his head separated from his body for underpaying his employees? Unless you want to engage in predatory capitalist practices, most say it would be karma if it happened.....

nikka said slitherBernie has been shytting on Bloomberg seemingly all campaign and The Bros gave Matthews that work and humbled him days before warren.
Trying to slither away with the credit![]()

I've said since last year that Warren's plans had more meat than Bernie's, but not sure why that would even be a factor in the primaries.
President sets the agenda, and unless the president has a specific plan he's pushing hard then it's Congress, not the White House, that writes the plan. Even when the White House does write a plan Congress goes ahead and fukks around with it something heavy before they get around to passing it. And who is in Congress....?
It reminds me of when Obama shyt on Clinton during the debates for wanting an individual mandate (because he thought forcing people to buy insurance didn't play well as a talking point), then turned around and included an individual mandate in the ACA. Did it matter who came up with it, or really what Obama's position on it was at all?
You vote for the candidate you trust to set the agenda, inspire the country forward, make good decisions in office, and have the integrity to stand by that agenda and not get on some other shyt. All the details get worked out between a few thousands voices of which 4/7 folk on the stage will be involved regardless of who wins.
@CNBC
South Carolina Rep. James Clyburn endorses Joe Biden days before pivotal primary South Carolina Rep. James Clyburn endorses Joe Biden days before pivotal primary
Basically, and endorsing Hillary I. 2016 didn't help her with the Progressive wing either, also claiming the primary was rigged after Donna Brazile's book and then backing down from that also hurt. She seems like a very smart lady who means well but when the rubber meets the road she tries to be too smart for her own good or just lacks conviction. Bernie may not be as smart or his policy positions as well thought out but conviction in the right moments, not backing down to the Establishment is where he wins. President's are managers anyway not administrators, no president is sitting down and writing legislation on their desktop. They have a lot of staff to do that type of thing. lol So Liz for her well thought out intricate plans it's really not the job.Its not sexism. Its only a finite amount of supporters to go around. She wins among "second choices" of bernie supporters and most of them are probably die hard supporters of his.
She should have ran in 2016, like Sanders encouraged her to do. She allowed Sanders to build up a dedicated base of what would have been her supporters since 2016. She waited too late.