47-0 (THE BEST EVER)

HARLEM AL

Your broad loves me.....
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
23,837
Reputation
4,519
Daps
95,790
Reppin
Harlem, NYC
No he isn't.

And if you don't think hearns gives Floyd trouble I have nothing to say to you. Dude had serious height and reach. And had power. The hawk was that nikka to.

The problem is this era fighters have no skill. Floyd can't do what he does to these fighters like he would the greats.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
Floyd not the greatest a of all time. Because he's never really challenged his skill set. He hand picks fighters that have the same style- no movement, comes forward, dosent cut off the ring.Basically just follows him around. He picks fighters that make him look good. He hasn't faced a true challenge since Zab.( Zab fukkd it up for himself by losing focuses). Oscar was old, Shane was way past his prime. Hatton was past due. Same for Cotto...
and Ortiz and Guerrero- you know DAMN well had no business being in there.
So who are all the fighters that PBF hasn't fought who would challenge his skill set?
 

ThadudeK9

Rookie
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
62
Reputation
10
Daps
86
So who are all the fighters that PBF hasn't fought who would challenge his skill set?

Honestly there's no one out there now. They talkn he might fight Khan but thats a no contest. My thing with Floyd is why didn't you fight th greats (Oscar, Shane, Cotto) earlier. He faced them when they were old. And of course I have to mention the PAC man (whose fadeing now too)
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
Honestly there's no one out there now. They talkn he might fight Khan but thats a no contest. My thing with Floyd is why didn't you fight th greats (Oscar, Shane, Cotto) earlier. He faced them when they were old. And of course I have to mention the PAC man (whose fadeing now too)
:mjlol: You don't know what you're talking about kid. I'm not even going to address that tired "uh uh he didn't fight prime Cotto, Mosley" argument. They both turned down opportunities to fight Floyd in their prime. As far as Pacquiao. His style is repetitive, he does nothing but move forward, ad he doesn't cut off the ring well. Why would you think that he has much of a shot? The reality is that PBF is that good. You don't have to like him but you should give credit where credit is due. He is the greatest.......of his generation. It's impossible to say what he would or wouldn't have done had he been in other eras with other all time greats. We can only judge him by what he's done.
 

ThadudeK9

Rookie
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
62
Reputation
10
Daps
86
:mjlol: You don't know what you're talking about kid. I'm not even going to address that tired "uh uh he didn't fight prime Cotto, Mosley" argument. They both turned down opportunities to fight Floyd in their prime. As far as Pacquiao. His style is repetitive, he does nothing but move forward, ad he doesn't cut off the ring well. Why would you think that he has much of a shot? The reality is that PBF is that good. You don't have to like him but you should give credit where credit is due. He is the greatest.......of his generation. It's impossible to say what he would or wouldn't have done had he been in other eras with other all time greats. We can only judge him by what he's done.





Show me proof of Cotto and Mosley turning him down. That dosent make sense kid; why would they agree to fight him outside their prime? When they would have settle for a smaller purse. Why not address it?!? He says he's the greatest. So prove it, you have to beat the greats when they're great. Not old and having to take fights to pay alimony. You said Pacquiao is repetitive and only moves forward. You right; just like Cotto did, Guerrero did, Balidimor did; even Canelo. That's the style Floyd picks. So why do I think he'd have much of a shot? I don't (at least not now tht he's senator and Henessey model) but 2 years ago he would've been. Event thought he is "repetitive" at one time he was explosive and unorthodox. That would've been a challenge for Floyd. I give Floyd credit! But it takes more than a shoulder roll to be the greatest. You gotta meet real challenges. I'm not comparing him to other decades, but based off of what he's done- he's selected opponents with a familiar style tht opposes no threat or challenge. He's a business man, styles make fights as they say, so he's cashing in. That's what I judge him on.
 

Gravity

Banned
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
18,816
Reputation
2,160
Daps
56,251
Show me proof of Cotto and Mosley turning him down. That dosent make sense kid; why would they agree to fight him outside their prime? When they would have settle for a smaller purse. Why not address it?!? He says he's the greatest. So prove it, you have to beat the greats when they're great. Not old and having to take fights to pay alimony. You said Pacquiao is repetitive and only moves forward. You right; just like Cotto did, Guerrero did, Balidimor did; even Canelo. That's the style Floyd picks. So why do I think he'd have much of a shot? I don't (at least not now tht he's senator and Henessey model) but 2 years ago he would've been. Event thought he is "repetitive" at one time he was explosive and unorthodox. That would've been a challenge for Floyd. I give Floyd credit! But it takes more than a shoulder roll to be the greatest. You gotta meet real challenges. I'm not comparing him to other decades, but based off of what he's done- he's selected opponents with a familiar style tht opposes no threat or challenge. He's a business man, styles make fights as they say, so he's cashing in. That's what I judge him on.
You need to adjust your tone if you want to be schooled. I'm not showing you shyt. You can either stay ignorant or go look the shyt up yourself.
 

Newzz

"The Truth" always prevails
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
44,924
Reputation
7,489
Daps
104,643
Bre



Breh, like what are you talking about? Is this you're attempt to turn the conversation into some esoteric and nebulous shyt? I know you don't know much about boxing, but you really need to get up on the history of the sport before you attempt to clarify things for others. Arguello is the best junior lightweight of all time. Duran is the best lightweight of all time, fact. Chavez the best junior welter. Ray Robinson the best Welter, fact. And 154 is debatable, but it isn't Mayweather for damn sure.

What you're asking is like saying what makes Ted Williams, Tony Gwynn, Ruth, Ty Cobb, Bonds, et al the best hitters of all time. It's generally agreed upon by people who seriously follow the sport presently and retroactively. Mayweather can't be the best of all time if he's not even the singular man in a division. This is common sense. It's like saying that Ali is the GOAT, but Joe Louis is the greatest heavyweight of all time. :wtf:

By the way, Sugar Ray Robinson is clearly the GOAT fighter. Floyd would cryogenically freeze himself to be revived at another time in history on some Demolition Man shyt if he had to fight Sugar. I don't even know why I'm entertaining you. You don't even know who the 140 champ is without googling it, but are in here trying to talk boxing. :snoop:

I'm going to let you rock, though. :sas1:

Good shyt breh:obama:
 
Top