5G towers are being set on fire because of corona conspiracies

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,064
Reputation
7,040
Daps
80,047
Reppin
BaBylon
I dont understand what we even need 5G on phones for. LTE is already fast enough for internet on phones and 5G does not even reach as far. If theres even a question about it being bad for people just dont use that shyt. I dont even need 5G, everything I do on my phone works just fine with LTE as it is now. shyt is just pointless.

:mjgrin:
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,691
Reputation
9,865
Daps
175,566
I dont understand what we even need 5G on phones for. LTE is already fast enough for internet on phones and 5G does not even reach as far. If theres even a question about it being bad for people just dont use that shyt. I dont even need 5G, everything I do on my phone works just fine with LTE as it is now. shyt is just pointless.

4g isn't fast enough, 5G allows for much greater speeds. there's no evidence that 5G which produces non-ionizing radiation is dangerous. you base the need for 5G on your wants and the limited possibilities you can conceive of it's use. 5G is gonna bring in some new competition for residential ISP's especially in rural areas stuck with shytty old satellite, DSL or dial-up. towers are usually already there for cell service, they can just add small cell site relays to lamp posts. and rural america can get high speed internet. The same will benifit 3rd world countries who will leap frog from not having fiber to the home to having wireless internet. it's costly to get permits and land rights to dig up dirt and bury fiber mile after mile. theres some serious cost savings with this tech.every carrier will soon offer 5G internet service for home use within 5 years. can't wait for those price wars.:wow:
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,646
Reputation
5,562
Daps
49,498
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Saw this on Claude's (AfTV) channel today..

I watched it in the forlorn hope of seeing a sensible joined-up-argument re. 5G's effects on health and its role as in the current pandemic.


IMO we do NOT want 5G. Not yet. And not because of any proven heath issues.

5G in and of itself is a bad idea given the types of leaders that we have.
 

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,064
Reputation
7,040
Daps
80,047
Reppin
BaBylon
NRzRZXX.png


SEER*Explorer Application

Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people) - United States | Data

5G is not going to microwave your brain: All the myths, debunked (Updated)


people was spouting the same conspiracy theories about 3g and 4g.:unimpressed:
:mjgrin:Set your goof ass down lil nigg. Now what?

Brussels Becomes First Major City to Halt 5G Due to Health Effects
By Josh del Sol


The statement was made by Céline Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy. From an interview last Friday, with L’Echo:

“I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.”

– Céline Fremault, Minister of the Government (Brussels-Captial Region), responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy

Ms. Fremault accurately identified that a 5G pilot project is not compatible with Belgian radiation safety standards(9 V/m, or 95 mW/m2 according to this online converter), and stated that she does not intend to make an exception. (In the Building Biology guidelines, the threshold for extreme concern is 1 mW/m2. However, many government agencies still only consider thermal effects, instead of the cumulative body of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies.)

Perhaps with Brussels heading up the European Union, and with one of the two major 5G appeals being addressed to the EU, officials there are better informed and motivated to protect themselves.

May support increase for Ms. Fremault and all officials who are hearing the call to sanity and prioritizing the people over the technocratic oligarchy.

2-MINUTE ACTION: To send a brief note of support to Ms. Fremault, go here; and to Brussels city councilors, go here. Encourage them of the importance to keep this ban permanent, despite industry’s forthcoming pressure.

The 5G Situation in Summary

There is almost no question that a 5G-world would place us all under an unprecedented level of surveillance and control; granting unheard-of powers to soulless corporate algorithms.

That should be enough to permanently delete the agenda right there, filed under “useful technology gone bad.”

Though perhaps an even bigger question for our time is: does 5G pose a major threat to all biological life? The independent evidence overwhelmingly indicates that it does.

That is, unless you ask wireless industry sources, who own the FCC and who recently put out this CNBC propaganda/commercial in a thinly-veiled attempt to quash pushback.

The talking heads of the wireless industry even brashly admit — when forced, in a US senate hearing — that they have not done any safety studies… and they don’t plan to.





The fact is, hundreds of scientists are trying everything to sound the alarm.

One such voice, Dr. Martin Pall, the WSU Professor Emeritus whose research actually lays out the mechanism of how wireless radiation causes harm in our cells, calls 5G “the stupidest idea in the history of the world.”

However, within the corporatized halls of government, there is a well-worn pattern of voices of reason being drowned out by the frothed frenzy of technocratic corporations, who envision 5G as an unprecedented economic opportunity for the full-on commercial exploitation of reality.

But 5G pushback is starting to get viral. The compilation of truth assembled in videos on 5G like this one provides a much-needed reality-check on the shocking state of greed and depravation among the agenda-pushers in our world.

While it may sound stark, after observing this for a long while, to me it honestly now appears that those pushing this agenda are stuck in a type of hive-mind syndrome, so frenzied with dollar-signs and “us-versus-them” progress-obsessions that they are in a mode incapable of self-corrective thought. Or at the very least, incapable of seeing where all of this is obviously heading — for them and their kids, too.

When the industry sheep are being presented with an avalanche of scientific evidence for a catastrophe-in-the-making, and yet they refuse to listen and instead continue to tow the profit-pushing line, what becomes visible is the shadow-expression of utter disdain for life. That may sound harsh, but I encourage you to consider this deeply.

Perhaps it’s the global, unconscious ‘death wish’ that is at the core of the 5G push. Perhaps this is also at the core of the desire to darkly exit the human condition via AI and transhumanism. Apparently this thought-form sees its escape and salvation through technology, instead of through humanity and/or our connection with divinity.

In any case, to any sane human with normal values, the situation is indeed bewildering. Though once we get over the distress, we are called into a kind of soul-led response. Perhaps it’s first a resolve to be sovereign in our thoughts, and to be steward of our mind. Then, inspiration and true Connectedness come when we become involved in manifesting the bigger solution — the choice of a positive future.

On this path, our root challenge is to remember: the power in our individual reality is truly within each of us, because who we are is not limited to the realms of duality and separation that we experience here.

The original source of this article is Collective Evolution
Copyright © Josh del Sol, Collective Evolution, 2019
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,646
Reputation
5,562
Daps
49,498
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
4g isn't fast enough, 5G allows for much greater speeds. there's no evidence that 5G which produces non-ionizing radiation is dangerous. you base the need for 5G on your wants and the limited possibilities you can conceive of it's use. 5G is gonna bring in some new competition for residential ISP's especially in rural areas stuck with shytty old satellite, DSL or dial-up. towers are usually already there for cell service, they can just add small cell site relays to lamp posts. and rural america can get high speed internet. The same will benifit 3rd world countries who will leap frog from not having fiber to the home to having wireless internet. it's costly to get permits and land rights to dig up dirt and bury fiber mile after mile. theres some serious cost savings with this tech.every carrier will soon offer 5G internet service for home use within 5 years. can't wait for those price wars.:wow:

5G gives too much power to those that control or have large scale access to the network to monitor and surveil the population.

Push it out to the 3rd world if they need it but current mobile speeds in the West are adequate for now.

Why the rush..? Why the constant rush all the time? Roll it out to a few countries and let's see what happens first.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,646
Reputation
5,562
Daps
49,498
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
98% of Thecoli posters-"If you are with Trump, you are a right wing nut job conspiracy theorist"

:sas2:

Some of you kats are looking funny in the light for supporting 5G

Correlation is not causality. Correlation is not being ideologically bound.

I imagine both Trump and I agree that the sky looks blue. That doesn't mean that I am in cahoots with him to any degree.
 

HiphopRelated

In Broad Daylight
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,227
Reputation
2,528
Daps
48,596
Reppin
My brother's keeper
I dont understand what we even need 5G on phones for. LTE is already fast enough for internet on phones and 5G does not even reach as far. If theres even a question about it being bad for people just dont use that shyt. I dont even need 5G, everything I do on my phone works just fine with LTE as it is now. shyt is just pointless.
Steam engines were "good enough", that's not how progress happens. Innovation doesn't happen on good enough.
 

Maximus Rex

Superstar
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
7,953
Reputation
-3,478
Daps
18,518
Reppin
The Evils of Men
:mjgrin:Set your goof ass down lil nigg. Now what?

Brussels Becomes First Major City to Halt 5G Due to Health Effects
By Josh del Sol


The statement was made by Céline Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy. From an interview last Friday, with L’Echo:



The original source of this article is Collective Evolution
Copyright © Josh del Sol, Collective Evolution, 2019

So no health effects seen in anyone but just going by alarmist scientists...yea okay
 

HiphopRelated

In Broad Daylight
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,227
Reputation
2,528
Daps
48,596
Reppin
My brother's keeper
Why the rush?
Because the World is competing against each other. Let's take self driving cars for example, the bandwidth(and low lag) necessary for all of them to communicate with each other would likely be possible over 5G networks, that means when it comes to implementation, you will have to be in a 5G country. Now who wants to be 2nd or 3rd on that revolution if it comes? And it doesn't mean personal cars. Imagine freight moving without drivers. The boost that could make to an economy.
 

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,646
Reputation
5,562
Daps
49,498
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
Because the World is competing against each other. Let's take self driving cars for example, the bandwidth(and low lag) necessary for all of them to communicate with each other would likely be possible over 5G networks, that means when it comes to implementation, you will have to be in a 5G country. Now who wants to be 2nd or 3rd on that revolution if it comes? And it doesn't mean personal cars. Imagine freight moving without drivers. The boost that could make to an economy.

Why do self-driving cars have to communicate with each other?

They don't ...
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
64,691
Reputation
9,865
Daps
175,566
Amazing your sources are from the Worldbank....

1. Who said it was just about cancer?

2. Your article that claims debunked didn't even touch the link I posted in page 1. It's ok...ignoring 240 scientists from many countries is what I expect.



it's not about the number of scientists cause if it was they're already outnumbered by people who disagree with them.

the scientists are just asking for a moratorium on 5G rollout based on their studies of 3g and 4g. So if it's not about cancer, it's gonna be a tough sell to the public getting people to stop using wireless tech cause some people may be getting headaches.
 
Top