8-6-15 GOP Faux News Debate Thread 8:50pm EST

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,958
Daps
120,921
Reppin
Behind You
They're not just doing things for the fukk of it. Decreasing gov't subsidies on loans and having colleges work more like a "normal market" is a viable solution in their eyes. Their logic is this -- college tuition is high because Gov't is artificially meeting the demand at said price by providing subsidies/loans, which removes any incentive for the market to lower prices, naturally. You remove/lower the subsidies than competing colleges have an incentive to lower prices because consumers will not be able to pay at the current price that colleges charge, and lowering prices would attract business away from competitors which would increase profits.
But we had a system where public colleges were cheap as hell and there was no student loan debt crisis until Republican governors like Ronald Reagan slashed funding for those schools and basically created the environment for these schools to begin behaving like businesses which led to the cash grab for the student loan money.
Just expecting schools to start lowering prices on their own when they have been free to raise costs at will is naive and decreasing student loan dollars isn't the best option either. If schools are raising costs because they figure that will get them more student loan money then add strings to the dissemination of student loans.
Any school that inflates costs without valid provable reasons will be shut out of the student loan money pool. Competent oversight is what is needed not overzealous slashing of student loan funding.
 

Jello Biafra

A true friend stabs you in the front
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
46,184
Reputation
4,958
Daps
120,921
Reppin
Behind You
1512417_1455576658097167_847095944829802457_n.jpg



:salute:
According to Politifact that meme is taking into account campaign contributions for Clinton and Sanders entire political careers and not for this campaign cycle.
 

duckbutta

eienaar van mans
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
42,101
Reputation
11,611
Daps
161,852
Reppin
DFW
When he said it did he say it in a positive way, as in that's what he wants them to do? :merchant:

Huckabee must have been gone off that Molly last night :russ:

Dude said our army should only exist to kill people :russ:

Backdoored that with we should completely get rid of the IRS:russ:

Realized he left his jacket, came back in, and on the way out said we should just completely get rid of Social Security to :russ:

Then made a point to tell you that the government is just using Social Security to rob the american people...which you wold think we need to find some way to get our money back from social security before getting rid of it...but nope...just shut it down and let the government skate off with 100 of billions of dollars...:russ:
 

duckbutta

eienaar van mans
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
42,101
Reputation
11,611
Daps
161,852
Reppin
DFW
I'm gonna have to vote for one of these clowns if Hillary wins the nominee.

Rubio looks the most Presidential and Kasick seemed like he's a good alternative.

Why would you vote for how a person "looks" :jbhmm:

Does the fact that Rubio ran Florida into the ground mean anything at all:jbhmm:

You voting a man into the white house cause he didn't have one strand of hair out of place? :jbhmm:

Kasick is the only guy who made any logical sense with any of his arguments...but he is the "alternative" to the guy who "looks" the most presidential :jbhmm:
 

CACtain Planet

The Power is YOURS!
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,182
Reputation
-10,805
Daps
13,280
Reppin
CACness Aberdeen
But we had a system where public colleges were cheap as hell and there was no student loan debt crisis until Republican governors like Ronald Reagan slashed funding for those schools and basically created the environment for these schools to begin behaving like businesses which led to the cash grab for the student loan money.
Just expecting schools to start lowering prices on their own when they have been free to raise costs at will is naive and decreasing student loan dollars isn't the best option either. If schools are raising costs because they figure that will get them more student loan money then add strings to the dissemination of student loans.
Any school that inflates costs without valid provable reasons will be shut out of the student loan money pool. Competent oversight is what is needed not overzealous slashing of student loan funding.

Not entirely true...the system that we had in place before was very inefficient in delivering loans and grants. The system in the 60's and 70's was wrought with fraud and the government started to decrease funding directly to colleges anyway. This was also when the University of Phoenix's and forprofit schools began to take federal student loan and pell grant funding (1972 to be exact). What Reagan and HW did regarding student loans was just a continuation of Carter and Nixon honestly. So whether we are directly funding schools like the old days or giving money directly to students either way the system will continue to waste billions.
 
Top