Jesus Shuttlesworth
I Got Game
You said all this to say what? What you are / are not and what you wish to be referred as is two totally different things.
I have no problem with what he wishes to be called, but he IS a black man and there's no getting around that. He can not definitively say that he isn't, which is exactly what he did
@RebelX
His newer tweets make him sound like dumb as hell. Black or dark having negative connotations doesn't stim from English or the anything to do with it. It comes from man's primal fear of darkness / black of night dating back to prehistoric man falling prey to animals at night.
The word Black originates from dark. Throughout man's history dark / darkness of night, absence of light, ect... has always been associated with negative or evil and that's when a majority of fukked up shyt like crimes, satanic shyt, sexual deviant activity, etc... Occurs even to this day
I think your going overboard by calling what he said dumb.
What he is saying is that technically none of us fit any of the characteristics given to the adjective "black" in the English dictionary. Technically none of us are dark enough to be the color "black" and hopefully none of us fit the other negative descriptions given to the word black in the English dictionary (Grim, wicked, dirty etc.)
In my opinion its trivial but a lot of people share this idea that "words have power" and say overstand instead of understand and don't refer to themselves as black.
It's definitely word play used by white people, you can't deny that. They call themselves "white" which is associated with pure and unblemished. But obviously they're not white either.
I won't go as far as to say "I'm not black" just because of the misinterpretations that may arise. At the end of the day, I know who I am, I know who my ancestors are, I know what they went through, I know what I go through, I know who my brothas and sistas are... Call it black, nikka, African American, whatever, none of those truths change.
But it would definitely be dope if we had a name for ourselves appointed by us. It wouldn't make us any less us, in fact, it would make us more us because we're identifying with ourselves instead of being identified.
