Adam Silver: Age limit top priority

godkiller

"We are the Fury"
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
26,164
Reputation
-4,793
Daps
35,660
Reppin
NULL
Teams managed to do it before the one and done era.

This state of affairs simply doesn't benefit young players. There's no hard evidence it benefits the NBA either. There are more than enough stars today and the NBA is making more money than ever. There's no moral or financial argument for increasing age limits. This is mostly an ideological position that isn't based in reason or evidence. Academics have done studies on NBA and NFL age limits and found few benefits. One year developing in the NCAA versus the NBA is inconsequential. Even the NBA knows the NCAA's development argument is bunk, which is why Adam Silver wants to change the NCAA shot clock. That would make players more transferable. He's a transparent puppet moron.
 

23Barrettcity

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
35,503
Reputation
1,510
Daps
52,452
Reppin
NULL
A couple of things. I said Americans, not Europeans.

Youth European matches get little to no TV coverage and are often played in small stadiums and they get no one in stadiums either. I actually think American sports should goto that model for athlete development, but that would never happen.

I do not agree with an age limit. I am of the mind that if you are ready at any age, then you should be able to play. Jennifer Capriati made it to the US Open final at 15 back in 1991, and won the Olympic Singles Gold Medal at 16. She was good enough.
Why don't we watch the dleague ? It's because it serves no purpose and the players song Make the NBA . We watch the summer league and Vegas games we'd watch a good dleague too . This shouldn't even be a discussion , players have been flopping for years and that's with years of college . But I look at the leagues current top stars and see a bunch of one and done players or in brons case no college . The media should be ashamed of themselves letting silver spill this bull
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
66,069
Reputation
6,609
Daps
177,002
Why don't we watch the dleague ? It's because it serves no purpose and the players song Make the NBA . We watch the summer league and Vegas games we'd watch a good dleague too . This shouldn't even be a discussion , players have been flopping for years and that's with years of college . But I look at the leagues current top stars and see a bunch of one and done players or in brons case no college . The media should be ashamed of themselves letting silver spill this bull
thats different, its high draft picks and I do not know what the TV ratings and attendance figures are for those summer league and Vegas games but they are not on ESPN or TNT.


But yeah, there is no reason for anyone to think that one and dones and HS players have spoiled the game. There is no evidence for it.
 

Captain Crunch

Veteran
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
45,555
Reputation
2,877
Daps
115,084
Reppin
NY
Tim Duncan, Shaquille O'Neal, Jason Kidd, Ben Wallace, Sam Cassell, Ron Artest, Baron Davis, Michael Redd, Allen Iverson, Steve Nash, Ray Allen, Dwyane Wade, Gilbert Arenas, Elton Brand, Chauncey Billups, Chris Paul, Deron Williams, Carlos Boozer, Paul Pierce, Brandon Roy, Russell Westbrook, Al Horford, Blake Griffin, Rajon Rondo, Paul George, James Harden all played multiple seasons of college though and they are all top players of the last 10 seasons


So half the list were stars, the rest were above average players :camby:
Someone tell me how great college has been for Wall; Durant, Bron, and AD? :troll:
 

Mensch Fontana

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
10,907
Reputation
1,460
Daps
24,878
Reppin
SOHHICEY
Right to work states (southern primarily) with public universities say :usure:
irrelevant all it takes is a majority of states to agree with students. those who oppose will see players chose not to go to those universities and will fall in line. i heard somewhere there trying to get that northwestern deal going here in california, which will pass easily.
 

calh45

Cal
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
12,227
Reputation
2,290
Daps
42,737
I didn't read the entire thread, but Bob Costas had the best take I've heard from a media cat on this whole situation.

The MLB AND NHL can draft high schoolers, but those high schools go into a feeder system then they develop from there. Not all kids make it to the pros, but they're paid and they have professionals paid to overlook their professional development instead of trying to look out for the school/make sure they go to classes etc.

The NFL and NBA use the NCAA as their feeder system. The 3 year rule is needed for football. Without a doubt just from a standpoint of physical maturity. The NBA doesn't need any of that. This would all go away once they set up a proper feeder system. They could draft kids out of high school (or any age) send them to the NBADL them pull them up when they're ready. If they never make it there should be a clause that the team pays for their college expenses. The NCAA wouldn't go for this though because bball is one of their big money sports
 

23Barrettcity

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
35,503
Reputation
1,510
Daps
52,452
Reppin
NULL
I didn't read the entire thread, but Bob Costas had the best take I've heard from a media cat on this whole situation.

The MLB AND NHL can draft high schoolers, but those high schools go into a feeder system then they develop from there. Not all kids make it to the pros, but they're paid and they have professionals paid to overlook their professional development instead of trying to look out for the school/make sure they go to classes etc.

The NFL and NBA use the NCAA as their feeder system. The 3 year rule is needed for football. Without a doubt just from a standpoint of physical maturity. The NBA doesn't need any of that. This would all go away once they set up a proper feeder system. They could draft kids out of high school (or any age) send them to the NBADL them pull them up when they're ready. If they never make it there should be a clause that the team pays for their college expenses. The NCAA wouldn't go for this though because bball is one of their big money sports
Yup and it could be a money maker If handled correctly .
This state of affairs simply doesn't benefit young players. There's no hard evidence it benefits the NBA either. There are more than enough stars today and the NBA is making more money than ever. There's no moral or financial argument for increasing age limits. This is mostly an ideological position that isn't based in reason or evidence. Academics have done studies on NBA and NFL age limits and found few benefits. One year developing in the NCAA versus the NBA is inconsequential. Even the NBA knows the NCAA's development argument is bunk, which is why Adam Silver wants to change the NCAA shot clock. That would make players more transferable. He's a transparent puppet moron.
Well said breh . I can't believe the media is even reporting this as serious . And say college was found to help players more it's no guarantee your coach won't be trying some crazy slow system that doesn't translate to the nba and if your not playing against nba quality players how much cab you really improve ? This is just more nonsense like the last lockout blaming the playsrs for getting overpaid by stupid front offices take some responsibility
 
Top