Alex Jones is fukin crazy WTF!!

fukkyalifestyle

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
14,373
Reputation
1,933
Daps
30,327
Alex is just very passionate plus has so much information to give out in such little time. I think he planned on kamakazing it the whole time. He said before hand he probably wouldnt get the 3 segments he was scheduled for and he did get two. I am a fan but he made him self look a little crazy to the average person. He got in some good points but most people are retarded and prob didnt get the message they just saw the craziness
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-609
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
GUN CONTROL FACT-SHEET (2004) - Gun Owners of America .ORG, but they have cites. Google "percentage of crimes committed with registered guns" to get other figures.

One-3 guys shoot up something. Are you seriously ready to remove the right to protect yourself because of that? You still take planes don't you? You still go to school don't you? You're children aren't going to school anymore? 1-10 people in the last 10 years doing crazy shyt, but 100 million NOT doing anything crazy and you're ready to give up your right?

What you all don't get is that it's not LEGAL holding citizens doing this. It's criminals. Criminals who will obtain any gun they want by theft, smuggling, and street purchases. Criminals who will have open reign on any who looks like they aren't holding (your typical coli poster and American citizen, anyone not in their circle). No one's going to come get the criminal guns. There's no way to even trace 'em. They will come for the 100 million who haven't done jack shyt.

If the police and army/government employees are allowed to have them, so should non-government employed citizens. We should not be giving the people we employee more rights than us.

:beli:
I was hoping you would've provided stats from a non-bias source

The point is not banning all guns. That's the argument made about reform-seekers inorder to get the gun-owners to react accordingly
-The point is that certain guns should not be available to the public
-Gun sellers need to be held accountable for being able to track their guns and who they choose to sell to
-Illegal guns are not due to "lost or stolen" guns but by back room sales
 

Pazzy

Superstar
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
31,263
Reputation
-6,161
Daps
49,126
Reppin
NULL
Stats show that countries who have high crime rate, who got rid of guns, only had higher crime rates afterwards. (ie. Australia).

Stats show that 2.5 million times a year, people are able to protect themselves from violent because they are armed in the United States.

Stats show that criminals are more afraid of encountering citizens with guns rather than police.

Stats show that women who hold guns have a relevantly higher success rate at warding off rapists.

There's nothing wrong with guns, but there is something wrong with certain people. And there is something wrong with giving the most powerful entity in this country the most powerful individualized weapon that equalizes us all.

did those stats include how to fix the problem of what's going on over here? :hmm: folks love talking about what's going on in australia, germany, japan and countries they never lived in let alone stepped foot in BUT i bet the people over there are less paranoid and feel safer than people do over here.
 

DaChampIsHere

Survive the drought
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
7,095
Reputation
422
Daps
9,564
Reppin
Great Pyramids of Giza
did those stats include how to fix the problem of what's going on over here? :hmm: folks love talking about what's going on in australia, germany, japan and countries they never lived in let alone stepped foot in BUT i bet the people over there are less paranoid and feel safer than people do over here.

You clearly don't know how studies/stats working. So I won't argue that with you.

But if 2.5 million people are able to protect themselves EVERY YEAR, you ready to have them all dead/wounded because of 2 crazies. You're being idiotic. :pachaha:

:beli:
I was hoping you would've provided stats from a non-bias source

The point is not banning all guns. That's the argument made about reform-seekers inorder to get the gun-owners to react accordingly
-The point is that certain guns should not be available to the public
-Gun sellers need to be held accountable for being able to track their guns and who they choose to sell to
-Illegal guns are not due to "lost or stolen" guns but by back room sales
Bias or not, it's cited.

I get that. But if the military and government employees can have them, American citizens should be able to do so as well.

Doesn't matter were illegal guns come from in relation to getting rid of legal guns. They aren't the ones that commit crimes.
 

Pazzy

Superstar
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
31,263
Reputation
-6,161
Daps
49,126
Reppin
NULL
You clearly don't know how studies/stats working. So I won't argue that with you.

But if 2.5 million people are able to protect themselves EVERY YEAR, you ready to have them all dead/wounded because of 2 crazies. You're being idiotic. :pachaha:

protect themselves from who exactly? so you have these people with a gun basically waiting to be a victim in order to use it. :no: so basically everybody is a potential victimizer because there is no way you can tell who is a crook, a rapist, a murderer, a serial killer and etc. you do not know.

you do realize that paranoia is actually a mental disorder. would you want a bunch of paranoid people to own guns?

folks forgot that trayvon martin was basically a victim because of that paranoia shyt. you have a paranoid jackass that became the same person that he was trying to "protect" his community against. he thought that the black man wearing a hoodie is a potential criminal despite not having any proof. :no: we can't even wear hoodies anymore because some paranoid jackasses with nothing better to do than to look for people that look like potential criminals through their eyes want to get the "victimizers" before they get them even though they have no clue to who they are to begin with. :deadmanny:

yeah, let's have these people with guns.

and let's not forget how life is viewed as cheap nowadays. that's what hurts the most. the nra, the pill companies, the news and etc see life as being cheap these days where basically money is treated with more value. look @ the nra with how they can't lose a dollar using the sandy hook shooting as an opportunity to sell more guns. "put armed guards in our schools". yeah, so you guys can make more money.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,458
Reputation
-609
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
Bias or not, it's cited.

I get that. But if the military and government employees can have them, American citizens should be able to do so as well.

Doesn't matter were illegal guns come from in relation to getting rid of legal guns. They aren't the ones that commit crimes.

But credibility is crucial on this debate because there are too many agents trying to skew and stifle the argument by talmbowt nothing

Again, getting rid of all guns is not the point of the initiative for gun reform. It's a constitutional right, so it's damn near impossible to remove the second amendment

The argument of "bu bu the government have these guns we should too" is a common argument fueled by the fear that the government will begin to attack the citizens. If the citizens are not also purchasing drones and military vehicles, then it don't matter how many guns you have. So that argument is ridiculous. Recall, a major gun reform occurred when black men were policing the police in Cali, so I'm not going to pretend that gun enthusias like Alex Jones have my community's high gun-violence problem as their focal point
 

DaChampIsHere

Survive the drought
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
7,095
Reputation
422
Daps
9,564
Reppin
Great Pyramids of Giza
But credibility is crucial on this debate because there are too many agents trying to skew and stifle the argument by talmbowt nothing

Again, getting rid of all guns is not the point of the initiative for gun reform. It's a constitutional right, so it's damn near impossible to remove the second amendment

The argument of "bu bu the government have these guns we should too" is a common argument fueled by the fear that the government will begin to attack the citizens. If the citizens are not also purchasing drones and military vehicles, then it don't matter how many guns you have. So that argument is ridiculous. Recall, a major gun reform occurred when black men were policing the police in Cali, so I'm not going to pretend that gun enthusias like Alex Jones have my community's high gun-violence problem as their focal point
protect themselves from who exactly? so you have these people with a gun basically waiting to be a victim in order to use it. :no: so basically everybody is a potential victimizer because there is no way you can tell who is a crook, a rapist, a murderer, a serial killer and etc. you do not know.

you do realize that paranoia is actually a mental disorder. would you want a bunch of paranoid people to own guns?

folks forgot that trayvon martin was basically a victim because of that paranoia shyt. you have a paranoid jackass that became the same person that he was trying to "protect" his community against. he thought that the black man wearing a hoodie is a potential criminal despite not having any proof. :no: we can't even wear hoodies anymore because some paranoid jackasses with nothing better to do than to look for people that look like potential criminals through their eyes want to get the "victimizers" before they get them even though they have no clue to who they are to begin with. :deadmanny:

yeah, let's have these people with guns.

and let's not forget how life is viewed as cheap nowadays. that's what hurts the most. the nra, the pill companies, the news and etc see life as being cheap these days where basically money is treated with more value. look @ the nra with how they can't lose a dollar using the sandy hook shooting as an opportunity to sell more guns. "put armed guards in our schools". yeah, so you guys can make more money.


Honestly don't even have time for it. You guys are right.

Let ban guns, or even certain guns and take them from legal gun owners. I'm sure that will stop Chicago/LA gang violence.

Millions of people are saving their lives with guns yearly? How dare they hold guns at the sake of 20-30 individuals. Those 60-70 lives > MILLIONS.

A government who has shot and harmed non-violent protestors will never harm citizens, right?

Get rid of your guns. The police will protect you, I'm sure. :smugbiden: If someone wants to rob you, it's America, the police are there at all times.

SN: It's crazy how regular ass citizens think they know so much. Legislators, senators, etc. all know they aren't going to touch gun laws because they know what's up. Sometimes it's good that the minority hold the power, because the majority doesn't know the value of it anyway.

Black people always want to talk about their right to vote and how it should be exercised, but aren't even knowledgeable on their own history and gun laws. Wise up.
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
42,077
Reputation
1,701
Daps
39,999
Reppin
NULL
Was Adam Lanza a criminal? Were Harris and Klebold criminals before their incidents. Lanza mom was a legal gun owner
 

Pazzy

Superstar
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
31,263
Reputation
-6,161
Daps
49,126
Reppin
NULL
Honestly don't even have time for it. You guys are right.

Let ban guns, or even certain guns and take them from legal gun owners. I'm sure that will stop Chicago/LA gang violence.

Millions of people are saving their lives with guns yearly? How dare they hold guns at the sake of 20-30 individuals. Those 60-70 lives > MILLIONS.

Get rid of your guns. The police will protect you, I'm sure. :smugbiden: If someone wants to rob you, it's America, the police are there at all times.

SN: It's crazy how regular ass citizens think they know so much. Legislators, senators, etc. all know they aren't going to touch gun laws because they know what's up. Sometimes it's good that the minority hold the power, because the majority doesn't know the value of it anyway.

Black people always want to talk about their right to vote and how it should be exercised, but aren't even knowledgeable on their own history and gun laws. Wise up.

you don't get it, do you?

look @ america. it's one huge business.

the police is a business. the government is a business. the gunmakers are a business. the medical company is a business. it's one huge business made up of other businesses basically profitted off of people. the system is set up that way to begin with.

of course, there's going to be crime and there's nothing you can do about it because the system is set up that way. there's a business made off of crime. you think that the gun makers give a fukk about people protecting or hurting other people with guns. you and them are just another dollar to be made. they don't give a fukk if you shoot somebody or die BUT i'm sure the doctors which would like to get paid off of your surgery, the funeral homes in charge of your burial, the doctor in the morgue that is in charge of your body, the government and the police which both have their own interests at heart care about you though. :clap:

people do NOT realize that there's a food chain going on in terms of money to be made but yet they give into that food chain.

sure, i understand why someone would want to protect themselves from harm. who wouldn't? there's no fun in being a victim or being in pain BUT to tell you the truth, at what cost are you willing to take to avoid it though? you might as well just accept it and not put money in the hands of these vultures that are basically sociopaths at the head of these corporations profitting off of human nature. everybody has some sort of anxiety and paranoia. it's that if you have too much of one of these, then you'll be affected where you'll start acting weird or thinking irrationally. there's ways to control it though and one of those is by turning off your tv away from the news and educating yourself. you can also control your anxiety by what you eat and a whole list of other things. however, if you can't control it, you might need to go see the shrinks and at the same time, be on your p's and q's.

alex jones himself is a businessman profitting off of people too. he is basically profitting off of a message by people that agree with that message. he's no different than piers morgan.

we all know to make money in order to survive BUT it's how you go about doing it. it just irks me to see people pointing fingers saying so and so is fukked up when they're basically doing the same thing. basically blaming the next person.
 
Top