This is revisionist history you trying to manifest might misdirect others but not me

y'alls talking point for why PlayStation is better than everything else was because of the exclusive games, and its the reason yall hate on Nintendo more than the average gamer because they having been doing what you claim PS does since the N64.
Yes, I feel like Playstation is better than the other platforms because they've had within the past several generations the best quality games that were developed by their first party studios. Idk what Nintendo has to do with that. Your boy
@MeachTheMonster hates Nintendo as well.
I don't hate Nintendo, stop trying to create a false narrative here. Best games of the decade included games that were only on PS3/4/5 at the time they released. Some of them going to PC later doesn't change that the experience was had on that platform.
This only started to change in recent years when exclusives started to look more and more like timed exclusives on PS more than completely exclusive aka you'll never get this on any other platform but playstation.
...
I never said "People only buy Playstation for exclusive games." That was yall, and thats my whole point.
No, no one ever said that. Please stop lying. Where is the post of anyone here saying "People
only buy Playstation for exclusive games." This "only" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
Most people don't buy consoles for exclusives but to play with their friends even if its not a multiplayer game, and by the time they do have enough of a reason to buy a console because of some exclusives typically the generation is ending or over.
Most people buy consoles for different reasons, but a lot of the reasons include typically GTA, COD, a groundbreaking game that everyone is talking about etc. Everyone is not buying
every game that comes out each year. Every 3rd party game isn't selling multiple millions each year.
Yall was never saying people should get a PS5 or 4 so they can cast a wide net and have more games available to them, that was the plus side for yall. It was "get a PS so you can play the banger exclusives only on PS" It was "get PS because Xbox has no games and Nintendo doesn't count" If casting a wide net to play as many games as possible was the goal all yall would have gamepass right now and not just have it, but championing it.
If someone says get a PS5 so you can get the majority of games that release plus their exclusives aka to cast a wide net, that's not a completely illogical, and loony statement to make. "Xbox has no games" was said because the main talking point at the beginning of the gen was it was going to be the most powerful console ever and completely outclass PS5 graphically, that didn't pan out and then they were already failing to deliver compelling exclusives to
differentiate themselves from Playstation. Nintendo doesn't count simply because Nintendo is clearly very different with their games catalog as well as being very different in terms of hardware. Most gamers who would get a PS5 would most likely get it in addition to another platform because of Mario, Pokemon, Zelda and Smash Bros.
Now they start to drop all of their first party games day 1 on PS5 and you're confused as to why people are championing PS5 as the best console this gen?
It's clearly different but somehow you see differently. I already know you're going to bring up an almost 2 year old port of a B-tier game Helldivers 2 as a false equivalency but go head
