the problem in SF and Seattle is that people don't have skills to get those jobs.People are pretending it will somehow be different than San Francisco, Seattle, etc.![]()
Get the skills.
Get the jobs.
the problem in SF and Seattle is that people don't have skills to get those jobs.People are pretending it will somehow be different than San Francisco, Seattle, etc.![]()
breh, they will hire from NYU and Columbia, and a few types of roles may be sourced from SUNY schools, otherwise they'll take the best talent and if that talent is coming from other geos, that's who gets the job. yall can keep arguing hypotheticals when i live, work, and do hiring in the epicenter of this industry. amazon in NY is a global attraction, it's not the same as a small amazon outpost in the south that would be a regional attraction and thus more local/regional candidates fill the roles
take a quick look at LinkedIn and see all the places people came from prior to working in Facebook Austin - it's aint all UT/Texas Tech grads and Austin/Dallas/Houston natives
If you have skills you don't have those problems.
Hell, the finance and law industry is proof of this. NYC finance and law jobs LOVE hiring locally...ESPECIALLY in NYC...arguably more than a lot of other cities!
i don't have an issue with where they hire from. top tech, finance, consulting, law and top F500 general management programs are always going to be selective, that's the game.so where should they hire from?
elites always do elite things.
Even in the south, theres target schools that get a lot of benefit for hires.
nah man...you can get jobs in finance from local schools in NYC.Nap, why don't
You mean the industries that hire largely from top 25 MBA and Law School programs? Yeah good luck getting a gig on Wall Street with a state school degree especially at the graduate and professional level.
If you have skills you don't have those problems.
Hell, the finance and law industry is proof of this. NYC finance and law jobs LOVE hiring locally...ESPECIALLY in NYC...arguably more than a lot of other cities!
there will be MORE local jobs than there were before. Thats the point.i don't have an issue with where they hire from. top tech, finance, consulting, law and top F500 general management programs are always going to be selective, that's the game.
my beef is them, and others, who act like these jobs were going to boost hiring in the local community (it won't) and then on top of that throw billions in subsidies to them under that ruse. if amazon just straight out wanted to move to NYC and put their own money behind this new campus, i wouldn't have an issue. it's the finesse move they're trying to pull that's the problem
nah man...you can get jobs in finance from local schools in NYC.
I've seen it.
Some of yall are confused.
i'm not indian. stop acting like some immature fukkboy and grow up when you address me son. Stay in your goddamn lane.You've proved in this thread you don't know what the fukk you are talking about. We won't tell you about Mumbai, you don't tell us about NYC and DMV.
Bro I don't understand how cats are not seeing this???People are pretending it will somehow be different than San Francisco, Seattle, etc.![]()
there will be MORE local jobs than there were before. Thats the point.
Some of something is better than none of nothing.
Of course a majority of jobs wouldn't go to local people. Why would they?
Do these locals have the skills in demand? If they do? They get the job!
i'm against the subsidies.But would the split be worth 3 Billion in subsidies and increases in cost of living for large swaths of the city? Not one study exist showing that the Amazon Deal actually benefits the public.
NYC Real Estate Brokers & Landlords Are Salivating Over Amazon Invasion
How A Useless $400 Million Tax Break For NYC Developers Chugged Along For 20 Years
i'm against the subsidies.
then breh, they should not receive all sorts of land grants and tax breaks...wtf are you arguing about? it's that damn simple.there will be MORE local jobs than there were before. Thats the point.
Some of something is better than none of nothing.
Of course a majority of jobs wouldn't go to local people. Why would they?
Do these locals have the skills in demand? If they do? They get the job!
i'm pushing a middle argument.then breh, they should not receive all sorts of land grants and tax breaks...wtf are you arguing about? it's that damn simple.![]()