I've already said that this isn't about excluding black People who have white people somewhere in their linage. It's about allowing people, who clearly are not black, the right to exit out of the black community.
People should not be forced into thenblwck community. If they say they are both black and white, then they are obviously not black.
Blackness, like I have mentioned before, is the measure of someone's commitment to an ingroup. Numbers for political strenght sounds good in theory but only if those numbers are organized and have a clear agenda. You can't organize with people who are not black (and are resentful at being forced to identify as black) for the benefit of black rights. They should be organizing for their own political agendas. You are arguing that people should be forced into blackness as some sort of curse by way of having 1 drop of black blood from some black ancestor.
That is stupid and not sustainable. Also pure black people's own blackness can be diminished as there is no control over who is accepted and the value of being black diminishes if you are forcing people to be black who don't want to be black.
You still aren't looking at the bigger picture and how in organized societies, it's always a numbers game. In the larger scheme of things, you just have to always play the numbers game. However, when it's time to effect/ask for a change - you go by making like-minded folks the loudest voice.
This isn't about forcing people into "blackness", it's about maintaining a status quo which is advantageous in pushing an agenda. I can even argue conversely that, there are a lot of people who look blacker than Akon with two black parents, who feel less black than a lot of biracial people (OJ, Mike Tirico, Larry Elder, Sheriff David Clarke etc., are classic examples). Where are you going to group these folks?


do ya'all think the good of that shyt is?




